← Back

Siemens

siemens

2,179 CVEs • 4,160 products

Products (4,160)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Jt2go
jt2go
Parasolid
parasolid
Solid Edge
solid_edge
Wincc
wincc
Sinec Nms
sinec-nms
Sinec Ins
sinec_ins
Jt Utilities
jt_utilities
Comos
comos
Simatic Wincc
simatic_wincc
Simatic Pcs 7
simatic_pcs_7
Simatic Pcs7
simatic_pcs7
Nucleus Net
nucleus_net
Pads Viewer
pads_viewer
Tecnomatix
tecnomatix
Sinema Server
sinema_server
Capital Vstar
capital_vstar

CVEs (2,179)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
2Paloaltonetworks
Siemens
2Pan Os
Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the User-ID™ Authentication Portal (aka Captive Portal) service of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges o...Show more
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the User-ID™ Authentication Portal (aka Captive Portal) service of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls by sending specially crafted packets. The risk of this issue is greatly reduced if you secure access to the User-ID™ Authentication Portal per the best practice guidelines https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail by restricting access to only trusted internal IP addresses. Prisma Access, Cloud NGFW and Panorama appliances are not impacted by this vulnerability.Show less
12Amazon
AristaCanonical+9 more
45Amazon Linux
Basesystem ModuleCaas Platform+42 more
Jul 15, 2026
Apr 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is...Show more
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.Show less
1Siemens
7Simcenter 3d
Simcenter FemapSimcenter Star Ccm+ Viewer+4 more
Jun 29, 2026
Apr 14, 2026
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
3.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens Software Center (All versions < V3.5.8.2), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002), Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (All versions < V2602),...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens Software Center (All versions < V3.5.8.2), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002), Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (All versions < V2602), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 13), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 04), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions < V2504.0008). Affected applications do not properly validate client certificates to connect to Analytics Service endpoint. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform man in the middle attacks.Show less
2Siemens
Sudo Project
2Sinec Os
Sudo
Jul 24, 2026
Apr 3, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Sudo through 1.9.17p2 before 3e474c2, a failure of a setuid, setgid, or setgroups call, during a privilege drop before running the mailer, is not a fatal error and can lead to privilege escalation.
2Openssl
Siemens
2Openssl
Simatic Cn 4100 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 13, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A l...Show more
Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.Show less
1Siemens
1Sinec Security Monitor
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.9.0). The affected application leaks confidential information in metadata, and files such as information on contributors and email address,...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.9.0). The affected application leaks confidential information in metadata, and files such as information on contributors and email address, on `SSM Server`.Show less
1Siemens
1Sicam Siapp Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
5.9 MEDIUM· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The affected application performs file deletion without properly validating the file path or target. An attacker could delete files or socke...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The affected application performs file deletion without properly validating the file path or target. An attacker could delete files or sockets that the affected process has permission to remove, potentially resulting in denial of service or service disruption.Show less
1Siemens
1Sicam Siapp Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
8.6 HIGH· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The affected application builds shell commands with caller-provided strings and executes them. An attacker could influence the executed comm...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The affected application builds shell commands with caller-provided strings and executes them. An attacker could influence the executed command, potentially resulting in command injection and full system compromise.Show less
1Siemens
1Sicam Siapp Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
5.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK server component does not enforce maximum length checks on certain variables before use. This could allow an attacker to...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK server component does not enforce maximum length checks on certain variables before use. This could allow an attacker to send an oversized input that could trigger a stack overflow crashing the process and potentially causing denial of service.Show less
1Siemens
1Sicam Siapp Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
5.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK client component does not enforce maximum length checks on certain variables before use. This could allow an attacker to...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK client component does not enforce maximum length checks on certain variables before use. This could allow an attacker to send an oversized input that could trigger a stack overflow crashing the process and potentially causing denial of service.Show less
1Siemens
1Sicam Siapp Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
7.5 HIGH· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK does not perform checks on input values potentially resulting in stack overflow. This could allow an attacker to perform...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK does not perform checks on input values potentially resulting in stack overflow. This could allow an attacker to perform code execution and denial of service.Show less
1Siemens
1Sicam Siapp Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
7.5 HIGH· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in SICAM SIAPP SDK. This could allow an attacker to write data beyond the intended buffer, poten...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in SICAM SIAPP SDK. This could allow an attacker to write data beyond the intended buffer, potentially leading to denial of service, or arbitrary code execution.Show less
1Siemens
2Sinec Nms
User Management Component
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP3), User Management Component (UMC) (All versions < V2.15.2.1). The affected application permits improper modification of a configuration file by a...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP3), User Management Component (UMC) (All versions < V2.15.2.1). The affected application permits improper modification of a configuration file by a low-privileged user. This could allow an attacker to load malicious DLLs, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges.(ZDI-CAN-28108)Show less
1Siemens
1Sinec Nms
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP2). The affected application permits improper modification of a configuration file by a low-privileged user. This could allow an attacker to load m...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP2). The affected application permits improper modification of a configuration file by a low-privileged user. This could allow an attacker to load malicious DLLs, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with administrative privilege.(ZDI-CAN-28107)Show less
1Siemens
2Simcenter Femap
Simcenter Nastran
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
7.3 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially craf...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted NDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.Show less
1Siemens
2Simcenter Femap
Simcenter Nastran
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
7.3 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected application is vulnerable to heap-based buffer overflow while parsing specially crafte...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected application is vulnerable to heap-based buffer overflow while parsing specially crafted NDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.Show less
1Siemens
2Simcenter Femap
Simcenter Nastran
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
7.3 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially craf...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted NDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.Show less
1Siemens
2Simcenter Femap
Simcenter Nastran
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
7.3 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially craf...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.Show less
1Siemens
2Simcenter Femap
Simcenter Nastran
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
7.3 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially craf...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.Show less
1Siemens
2Simcenter Femap
Simcenter Nastran
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2026
7.3 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds write vulnerability while parsing specially cra...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds write vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.Show less