Clear
More filters
Type at least 2 characters, then select a match.
Type at least 2 characters, then select a match.
Type at least 2 characters, then select a match.

Dates include the whole day in UTC. All selected filters apply together.

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Oracle
1Jd Edwards Enterpriseone Tools
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 20, 2026
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Portal SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthentica...Show more
Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Portal SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
8.6 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through...Show more
The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof...Show more
If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
BIND may accept incorrect child-zone NSEC3 records as valid, which could allow an attacker to forge authenticated NXDOMAIN responses. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.2...Show more
BIND may accept incorrect child-zone NSEC3 records as valid, which could allow an attacker to forge authenticated NXDOMAIN responses. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
If BIND encounters a particular invalid data structure in a DNS record, it will accept the invalid data, and may subsequently abort and exit. BIND will first need to store a DNS record for a key (KEY, DNSKEY, etc.). Tha...Show more
If BIND encounters a particular invalid data structure in a DNS record, it will accept the invalid data, and may subsequently abort and exit. BIND will first need to store a DNS record for a key (KEY, DNSKEY, etc.). That key must specify a PRIVATEDNS algorithm (253), and in the algorithm identifier, improperly give a length longer than the actual identifier data. The invalid identifier will be stored. If BIND later needs to render that record to text, it will use the invalid length during processing, leading to a consistency check failing. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An attacker who knows (or guesses) that a resolver uses RPZ with wildcard CNAME policies can craft query names long enough to trigger a NAMETOOLONG error condition during RPZ processing. This is not handled correctly and...Show more
An attacker who knows (or guesses) that a resolver uses RPZ with wildcard CNAME policies can craft query names long enough to trigger a NAMETOOLONG error condition during RPZ processing. This is not handled correctly and may lead to defeating the RPZ rule. It also may lead to an unexpected exit of the BIND 9 software. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The issue is a resource exhaustion vulnerability associated with DNSSEC validation. BIND always validates all RRSIG records in an answer, even if they are not strictly needed. A query to an authoritative server/zone whic...Show more
The issue is a resource exhaustion vulnerability associated with DNSSEC validation. BIND always validates all RRSIG records in an answer, even if they are not strictly needed. A query to an authoritative server/zone which returns many valid but superfluous RRSIG records causes the validator to waste disproportionate CPU time. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A DNSSEC validating resolver that is under a random subdomain attack against a DNSSEC-signed zone can suffer from runaway memory usage. The attacker needs to be able to send queries faster than the resolver can perform v...Show more
A DNSSEC validating resolver that is under a random subdomain attack against a DNSSEC-signed zone can suffer from runaway memory usage. The attacker needs to be able to send queries faster than the resolver can perform validation. The increased memory usage can be orders of magnitude beyond the limit configured in the `max-cache-size` parameter. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
1Isc
1Bind
Nov 2, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
It is possible for an attacker's zone to respond to a query with an RRSIG that has a smaller number of labels than the zone in which the RRSIG is contained. This causes `named` to produce a wildcard name for a zone that...Show more
It is possible for an attacker's zone to respond to a query with an RRSIG that has a smaller number of labels than the zone in which the RRSIG is contained. This causes `named` to produce a wildcard name for a zone that is shorter than the attacker's zone, which can result in cache poisoning. For this attack to have any effect, the resolver under attack must have set `synth-from-dnssec yes;` (which is the default). This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
SUSE Rancher Fleet clusters reference a kubeconfig secret that the controller uses to install and manage a Fleet agent on the target cluster. The controller did not sufficiently restrict which kubeconfig secrets a Fleet...Show more
SUSE Rancher Fleet clusters reference a kubeconfig secret that the controller uses to install and manage a Fleet agent on the target cluster. The controller did not sufficiently restrict which kubeconfig secrets a Fleet Cluster object was allowed to reference. As a result, a Fleet cluster defined in a namespace an ordinary user controls could be associated with administrative credentials for the management cluster itself, causing the controller to manage the management cluster on that user's behalf and to run that user's Fleet content there with elevated privileges. This affects SUSE Rancher Fleet 0.16.0 up to 0.16.3, 0.15.0 up to 0.15.8, 0.14.0 up to 0.14.12, 0.13.0 up to 0.13.17 and possible older versions.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected because it does not describe a security vulnerability.
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Missing Authorization vulnerability in TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute eta-register allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects eta-register: from 2.0.8 before 2.0.9.
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Missing filtering in the SUSE Rancher Manager meta proxy could cause passed in rancher credentials to be leaked to cloud providers. This affects SUSE Rancher 2.15.0 up to 2.15.3, 2.14.0 up to 2.14.7, 2.13.0 up to 2.13.11...Show more
Missing filtering in the SUSE Rancher Manager meta proxy could cause passed in rancher credentials to be leaked to cloud providers. This affects SUSE Rancher 2.15.0 up to 2.15.3, 2.14.0 up to 2.14.7, 2.13.0 up to 2.13.11,Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A privilege escalation issue was discovered in Rancher Manager's role-based access control. The inheritedNamespacedRules field of a GlobalRole propagates permissions into named namespaces of every downstream cluster mana...Show more
A privilege escalation issue was discovered in Rancher Manager's role-based access control. The inheritedNamespacedRules field of a GlobalRole propagates permissions into named namespaces of every downstream cluster managed by the Rancher instance, but it was not subject to the privilege-escalation validation applied to the other permission-carrying fields of a GlobalRole. As a result, a non-administrative user could be granted, through a global role  binding, permissions in downstream clusters that exceed the permissions that user already holds. This affected SUSE Rancher 2.15.2 only, and SUSE Rancher Webhook 0.11.0 up to 0.11.4, and 0.12.0 up to 0.12.1.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 20, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. Opening a file referencing a network share may lead to unexpected software execution.
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 29, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
MasterStudy LMS plugin for WordPress before 3.7.50 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user, including Subscribers, to trigger the stm_lms_send_test_email_ajax AJAX action without...Show more
MasterStudy LMS plugin for WordPress before 3.7.50 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user, including Subscribers, to trigger the stm_lms_send_test_email_ajax AJAX action without capability or nonce validation. Attackers can invoke this handler directly or via cross-site request forgery to cause an uncaught PHP fatal error that, when display_errors is enabled, discloses the absolute filesystem path of the plugin.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Starnet Computer and Network Systems Inventory Tracking Application allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Inventor...Show more
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Starnet Computer and Network Systems Inventory Tracking Application allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Inventory Tracking Application: through 2026-10-16.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Furl versions through 3.15 for Perl allow memory exhaustion via unbounded decompression of HTTP responses. Furl inflates a response body sent with a gzip, x-gzip or deflate Content-Encoding and appends the output to the...Show more
Furl versions through 3.15 for Perl allow memory exhaustion via unbounded decompression of HTTP responses. Furl inflates a response body sent with a gzip, x-gzip or deflate Content-Encoding and appends the output to the response string with no size limit. It does this whether or not the request asked for compression, and no option caps the decompressed size. Responses read with write_file or write_code are streamed rather than held in memory. A malicious server, or an attacker on a plain HTTP connection, can send a small compressed response that expands to exhaust the client's memory and end the process.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A firmware verification vulnerability in Creative Sound Blaster Katana could allow an attacker to modify a legitimate firmware image and upload the modified firmware to an affected device.
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 19, 2026
8.8 HIGH· v4
8.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
MLflow 3.17.1 and earlier contains a path traversal vulnerability in the FileStore tracking backend that allows unauthenticated attackers to control filesystem paths by submitting a crafted trace ID containing traversal...Show more
MLflow 3.17.1 and earlier contains a path traversal vulnerability in the FileStore tracking backend that allows unauthenticated attackers to control filesystem paths by submitting a crafted trace ID containing traversal sequences to the POST /api/3.0/mlflow/traces endpoint. Attackers can exploit FileStore.start_trace() to write trace_info.yaml, request_metadata, and tag files with attacker-controlled metadata outside the intended experiment trace directory, subject to the server process's filesystem permissions. FileStore is the default tracking backend before MLflow 3.7.0 and opt-in thereafter (the default changed to a SQLite database), so deployments in the earlier part of the affected range are vulnerable without special configuration while later ones are affected only when FileStore is explicitly selected.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 29, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
DB-GPT v0.7.5 and 0.8.0 contains directory traversal in use_example_file (packages/dbgpt-app/src/dbgpt_app/openapi/api_v1/examples_api.py:129). A remote attacker can use the validated exploitation path to write files out...Show more
DB-GPT v0.7.5 and 0.8.0 contains directory traversal in use_example_file (packages/dbgpt-app/src/dbgpt_app/openapi/api_v1/examples_api.py:129). A remote attacker can use the validated exploitation path to write files outside the intended workspace or storage boundary.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
8.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The Admin REST API accepts user-supplied input without adequately sanitizing it, allowing it to be included in the structure of SQL statements. A user with administrator privileges can exploit this by influencing the st...Show more
The Admin REST API accepts user-supplied input without adequately sanitizing it, allowing it to be included in the structure of SQL statements. A user with administrator privileges can exploit this by influencing the structure of executed SQL statements, enabling blind SQL injection to infer database information and potentially impact the availability of the database service.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
wrensec-commons contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the CREST framework's HTTP binding. The HttpUtils.prepareResponse() method used the _mimeType request parameter to set the Content-Type res...Show more
wrensec-commons contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the CREST framework's HTTP binding. The HttpUtils.prepareResponse() method used the _mimeType request parameter to set the Content-Type response header without proper sanitization. By sending a GET request with _mimeType=text/html, an attacker could cause the browser to interpret a CREST JSON response as HTML, enabling execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser. The vulnerability is exploitable by tricking a user into visiting a crafted URL targeting any deployed CREST endpoint. The issue is fixed in versions 22.6.2 and 23.0.0.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
8.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In GPU pdma, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed...Show more
In GPU pdma, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11365075; Issue ID: MSV-9546.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In display, there is a possible system crash due to a logic error. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitatio...Show more
In display, there is a possible system crash due to a logic error. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11410704; Issue ID: MSV-9574.Show less