← Back
CWE-269

2,910 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Improper Privilege Management

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (2,910)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible missing permission check due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User...Show more
In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible missing permission check due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute code in the launcher process due to an over-privileged shell user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed...Show more
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute code in the launcher process due to an over-privileged shell user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple functions of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible way to install unverified apps due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution p...Show more
In multiple functions of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible way to install unverified apps due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In onCreate of DisableSupervisionActivity.kt, there is a possible way to delete supervision data due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges neede...Show more
In onCreate of DisableSupervisionActivity.kt, there is a possible way to delete supervision data due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
6.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In createSessionInternal of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible to update a Device Policy Controller (DPC) into an invalid directory due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of pri...Show more
In createSessionInternal of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible to update a Device Policy Controller (DPC) into an invalid directory due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
In handleBondStateChanged of AdapterService.java, there is a possible sensitive information disclosure due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges...Show more
In handleBondStateChanged of AdapterService.java, there is a possible sensitive information disclosure due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In hide of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving permissions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileg...Show more
In hide of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving permissions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
6.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In InputInterceptor of Letterbox.java, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution...Show more
In InputInterceptor of Letterbox.java, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
In updateProvidersWhenServiceRemoved of CredentialManagerService.java, there is a possible way to override settings across users due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additi...Show more
In updateProvidersWhenServiceRemoved of CredentialManagerService.java, there is a possible way to override settings across users due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple locations, there is a possible tapjacking due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for...Show more
In multiple locations, there is a possible tapjacking due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
-
-
Jul 22, 2026
Jun 1, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw has been found in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.11.3. The impacted element is the function handleSave of the file internal/http/tts_config.go of the component RoleAdmin Gateway. This manipulation causes improper...Show more
A flaw has been found in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.11.3. The impacted element is the function handleSave of the file internal/http/tts_config.go of the component RoleAdmin Gateway. This manipulation causes improper privilege management. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project tagged the reported issue as bug.Show less
1Otrs
1Otrs
Jul 22, 2026
May 31, 2026
N/A· v4
5.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An improper default configuration in OTRS 2026.3.1 causes ticket article forwarding actions to enforce the “Is visible for customer” flag by default and prevent users from disabling it via the UI. This leads to unintende...Show more
An improper default configuration in OTRS 2026.3.1 causes ticket article forwarding actions to enforce the “Is visible for customer” flag by default and prevent users from disabling it via the UI. This leads to unintended exposure of internal ticket information to the External Frontend This issue affects OTRS 2026.3.1Show less
-
-
Jul 22, 2026
May 30, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The Spectra Gutenberg Blocks – Website Builder for the Block Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.19.25. This makes it possible for authenticated atta...Show more
The Spectra Gutenberg Blocks – Website Builder for the Block Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.19.25. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to execute code on the server. Exploitation requires a two-block payload embedded in post content: the first block registers a fake uagb/-prefixed block type with an attacker-specified render_callback, and the second block of the same fake type triggers invocation of that callback via call_user_func() during sequential block rendering in the same page request.Show less
-
-
Jul 22, 2026
May 29, 2026
N/A· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, two distinct authorization defects in the team settings allowed any authenticated panel user to take over the RBAC system. Settings/Team/Index had no mount()...Show more
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, two distinct authorization defects in the team settings allowed any authenticated panel user to take over the RBAC system. Settings/Team/Index had no mount() authorization. Any authenticated user could load the page and use its public actions to create new roles and delete other users, including administrators. Settings/Team/RolePermission gated its write actions on the read-only view_users permission. Any user holding view_users could grant themselves or any other user arbitrary permissions, including manage_users and edit_orders, effectively escalating to full panel administrator from a read-only account. Combined, these two defects allow a low-privilege authenticated user to obtain administrator privileges and remove the legitimate administrators from the panel. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.0.Show less
-
-
Jul 22, 2026
May 29, 2026
N/A· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). In 0.26.7 and earlier, the schedule router does not enforce organization/role checks. As a result, any authenticated user can create, update, run, or delete...Show more
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). In 0.26.7 and earlier, the schedule router does not enforce organization/role checks. As a result, any authenticated user can create, update, run, or delete schedules belonging to other organizations if they know the scheduleId/serverId. Schedule types server and dokploy-server write and execute scripts on the host or remote servers, enabling RCE on the Dokploy host or a target server.Show less
-
-
Jul 21, 2026
May 29, 2026
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.2, improper validation in the PUT /rustfs/admin/v3/import-iam endpoint allows a user with ImportIAMAction to create service accounts under...Show more
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.2, improper validation in the PUT /rustfs/admin/v3/import-iam endpoint allows a user with ImportIAMAction to create service accounts under arbitrary parent identities, including the root user (minioadmin). The endpoint accepts attacker-controlled parent, claims, accessKey, and secretKey values without enforcing privilege boundaries or sanitization. This enables privilege escalation to full administrative access using a persistent, attacker-defined credential. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.0-beta.2.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 21, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 148.0.7778.216 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 20, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.216 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 21, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Skia in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.216 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page....Show more
Inappropriate implementation in Skia in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.216 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)Show less
-
-
Jul 21, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Validation Bypass in all versions up to and including 0.9.2.5. The vulnerability exists due to the after_validate_save_p...Show more
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Validation Bypass in all versions up to and including 0.9.2.5. The vulnerability exists due to the after_validate_save_post() function unconditionally trusting the attacker-controlled _acf_post_id POST parameter — with no authentication or integrity verification — to select a cleanup branch that silently discards all validation errors not prefixed with acfe:. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to suppress both the role allow-list validation error added by acfe_field_user_roles::validate_front_value() and the administrator-role capability guard error added by acfe_module_form_action_user::validate_action(), causing wp_insert_user() to execute with an attacker-supplied administrator role argument and resulting in the creation of a new administrator-level user account. Exploitation requires the target site to expose a public ACFE frontend form configured with a Create User action that maps a role field.Show less