An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the captive portal service of an affected device can terminate active captive portal sessions, including forcing logout of specific users or clearing all active sessions...Show moreAn unauthenticated attacker with network access to the captive portal service of an affected device can terminate active captive portal sessions, including forcing logout of specific users or clearing all active sessions. Affected users must re-authenticate to regain access.
Successful exploitation may allow termination of individual or all active captive portal sessions, causing temporary service disruption and requiring users to re-authenticate.Show less |
A vulnerability exists in the Dynamic DNS (DDNS) functionality of TP-Link Omada Gateways. During communication with a third-party DDNS service, authentication credentials are transmitted over an unencrypted channel. An a...Show moreA vulnerability exists in the Dynamic DNS (DDNS) functionality of TP-Link Omada Gateways. During communication with a third-party DDNS service, authentication credentials are transmitted over an unencrypted channel. An attacker who can observe or manipulate traffic between an affected device and the DDNS service may obtain sensitive authentication information or interfere with DDNS update operations. Exploitation requires DDNS to be configured, communication with an external DDNS service, and attacker visibility or control of the relevant network path.
Successful exploitation may result in disclosure of DDNS account credentials, unauthorized access to DDNS management functionality, or modification of DNS records associated with the affected deployment.Show less |
A pre-authentication OS command injection vulnerability has been identified in Omada gateways configured to operate as an OpenVPN Server due to insufficient validation of client-supplied data during OpenVPN connection es...Show moreA pre-authentication OS command injection vulnerability has been identified in Omada gateways configured to operate as an OpenVPN Server due to insufficient validation of client-supplied data during OpenVPN connection establishment. An unauthenticated remote attacker may provide specially crafted input influencing backend command execution logic before authentication completes. Exploitation requires the OpenVPN Server feature to be enabled, VPN service reachable by the attacker and attacker to be able to initiate an OpenVPN connection attempt.
Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary command execution, potentially
leading to full compromise of the affected device.Show less |
An
unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability was identified in TP-Link TL-MR100 v3.2, TL-MR150 v3.2, TL-MR6400 v8.0 and Archer MR600 v2, due to improper handling of exceptional request conditions
that may lead to a...Show moreAn
unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability was identified in TP-Link TL-MR100 v3.2, TL-MR150 v3.2, TL-MR6400 v8.0 and Archer MR600 v2, due to improper handling of exceptional request conditions
that may lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
A remote attacker on an adjacent network can send a specially crated
HTTP request to trigger a crash of the HTTP service process.
Successful
exploitation may cause the HTTP service to crash, making the web management
interface and HTTP-dependent functionality temporarily unavailable.Show less |
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the web management interface of Archer C20 v6 firmware when processing certain WAN-related configuration operations. An authenticated administrator may exploit insufficient...Show moreAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in the web management interface of Archer C20 v6 firmware when processing certain WAN-related configuration operations. An authenticated administrator may exploit insufficient input validation to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially resulting in full device compromise.
Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary command execution with elevated privileges, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected device and network traffic passing through it.Show less |
Tapo
C100/C101 V5 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the RTSP
service. An authenticated attacker on the local network can send specially
crafted RTSP frame data containing oversized length values, res...Show moreTapo
C100/C101 V5 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the RTSP
service. An authenticated attacker on the local network can send specially
crafted RTSP frame data containing oversized length values, resulting in
out-of-bounds heap writes.
Successful
exploitation can crash the RTSP service and trigger a device reboot, resulting
in a temporary denial-of-service condition.Show less |
Tapo C100/C101 V5 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in the RTSP service. An attacker on the local network can send specially crafted requests that cause the service to dereference an invalid pointer, resu...Show moreTapo C100/C101 V5 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in the RTSP service. An attacker on the local network can send specially crafted requests that cause the service to dereference an invalid pointer, resulting in a service crash and device reboot. Successful exploitation can disrupt live video streaming functionality and cause a temporary denial-of-service condition.Show less |
An improper input
validation vulnerability in the configuration service for processing encrypted
credential data has been identified in Tapo C200 v5. An attacker can send oversized crypted
ciphertext values that may tri...Show moreAn improper input
validation vulnerability in the configuration service for processing encrypted
credential data has been identified in Tapo C200 v5. An attacker can send oversized crypted
ciphertext values that may trigger exception handling failures, due to insufficient
validation, causing the affected device to crash or restart.
Successful
exploitation may temporarily disrupt HTTPS management and monitoring
functionality, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition until the
service recovers.Show less |
Tapo C120 v1 and C200 v5
contain an improper authentication vulnerability within the login
authentication verification module. An attacker on the local network can
exploit weaknesses in challenge parameter validation to...Show moreTapo C120 v1 and C200 v5
contain an improper authentication vulnerability within the login
authentication verification module. An attacker on the local network can
exploit weaknesses in challenge parameter validation to bypass normal
authentication controls and obtain administrative session tokens.
Successful
exploitation may allow an attacker to subsequently execute privileged
management actions, enable unauthorized administrative access and temporary
disruption of device services, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS)
condition.Show less |
The web
interface of the affected
device relies on the HTTP referrer header as part of
request validation. Requests containing empty Referer value, or omitting
the Referer header entirely, may be accepted and processed...Show moreThe web
interface of the affected
device relies on the HTTP referrer header as part of
request validation. Requests containing empty Referer value, or omitting
the Referer header entirely, may be accepted and processed due to insufficient
validation logic.
Successful exploitation may allow an adjacent attacker with access to the web management
interface to obtain device configuration details and other sensitive
information.Show less |
Tapo P110 v1
smart Wi-Fi Plug contains an improper boundary validation vulnerability in the
handling of authenticated HTTP request bodies due to insufficient input
validation before memory copy operations. This may lead...Show moreTapo P110 v1
smart Wi-Fi Plug contains an improper boundary validation vulnerability in the
handling of authenticated HTTP request bodies due to insufficient input
validation before memory copy operations. This may lead to buffer overflow condition,
causing the web service process to crash.
Successful exploitation
may cause the web service process to stop responding or restart, resulting in a
denial-of-service condition.Show less |
A
cryptographic weakness exists in affected Omada devices where site credentials
are protected using a legacy hashing algorithm that does not provide sufficient
protection.
An attacker
who obtains access to stor...Show moreA
cryptographic weakness exists in affected Omada devices where site credentials
are protected using a legacy hashing algorithm that does not provide sufficient
protection.
An attacker
who obtains access to stored credential data may be able to recover valid credentials
to gain unauthorized access to affected devices or management environments.Show less |
A race
condition exists in the cloud-based Omada device adoption process when an
attacker may be able to interact with the adoption workflow before a legitimate
device completes registration, resulting in provisioning in...Show moreA race
condition exists in the cloud-based Omada device adoption process when an
attacker may be able to interact with the adoption workflow before a legitimate
device completes registration, resulting in provisioning information being
delivered to an attacker.
Successful
exploitation may allow disclosure of provisioning information intended for a
legitimate device.Show less |
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol where session encryption keys
used to protect communications between controllers and managed devices may be
predictable due to insufficient entropy in sessio...Show moreA cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol where session encryption keys
used to protect communications between controllers and managed devices may be
predictable due to insufficient entropy in session key generation.
An attacker
who successfully intercepts adoption-related communications may be able to recover
session encryption keys and decrypt affected communications.Show less |
Affected
Omada devices rely on embedded certificates that are shared across deployments
to establish trust between controllers and managed devices.
An attacker
who obtains the embedded certificates may be able t...Show moreAffected
Omada devices rely on embedded certificates that are shared across deployments
to establish trust between controllers and managed devices.
An attacker
who obtains the embedded certificates may be able to impersonate trusted
controllers or devices and intercept affected communications.Show less |
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol.
The protocol relies on hard-coded cryptographic keys to establish trust and
protect authentication exchanges between controllers and managed devices during...Show moreA cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol.
The protocol relies on hard-coded cryptographic keys to establish trust and
protect authentication exchanges between controllers and managed devices during
device adoption.
An attacker may
be able to impersonate trusted controllers or managed devices and gain access
to sensitive adoption-related communications.Show less |
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada device adoption process. During adoption, authentication credentials associated
with site management are transmitted using a weak hashing algorithm that does
not provide suff...Show moreA cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada device adoption process. During adoption, authentication credentials associated
with site management are transmitted using a weak hashing algorithm that does
not provide sufficient protection.
An attacker who
successfully intercepts adoption-related authentication traffic may be able to
recover valid credentials and gain unauthorized access to managed devices or
controller-managed environments.Show less |
A
certification validation weakness exists in communication between affected
Omada devices and cloud controllers. Certificate identity verification does not
adequately validate that a presented certificate corresponds to...Show moreA
certification validation weakness exists in communication between affected
Omada devices and cloud controllers. Certificate identity verification does not
adequately validate that a presented certificate corresponds to the expected
cloud controller hostname, which may allow certificate validation protections
to be bypassed under specific conditions.
Successful
exploitation may allow interception or modification of communication between
affected devices and cloud controllers.Show less |
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a special...Show moreAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.Show less |
Kasa EC71 v4 and EC70 v4 firmware contains a static cryptographic private key stored in a read-only filesystem
that is shared across devices. An
attacker with access to the firmware image can extract the embedded key....Show moreKasa EC71 v4 and EC70 v4 firmware contains a static cryptographic private key stored in a read-only filesystem
that is shared across devices. An
attacker with access to the firmware image can extract the embedded key.
Successful
exploitation may allow an unauthenticated attacker on the same network to use
this key in the web management service, compromising the confidentiality of
encrypted communications. This may enable passive decryption of traffic or
active man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacksShow less |