← Back

Redhat

redhat

5,674 CVEs • 537 products

Products (537)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Linux
linux
Satellite
satellite
Openstack
openstack
Openshift
openshift
Keycloak
keycloak
Fedora Core
fedora_core
Libvirt
libvirt
Ansible Tower
ansible_tower
Cloudforms
cloudforms
Ansible
ansible
Ceph Storage
ceph_storage
Linux Desktop
linux_desktop
Linux Server
linux_server
Jboss Fuse
jboss_fuse
Undertow
undertow
Storage
storage
Quay
quay
Fuse
fuse
Data Grid
data_grid
Resteasy
resteasy
Wildfly
wildfly
Jboss A Mq
jboss_a-mq
Ceph
ceph

CVEs (5,674)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
2Debian
Redhat
2Ansible
Debian Linux
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 26, 2020
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
6.1 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in the solaris_zone module from the Ansible Community modules. When setting the name for the zone on the Solaris host, the zone name is checked by listing the process with the 'ps' bare command on the re...Show more
A flaw was found in the solaris_zone module from the Ansible Community modules. When setting the name for the zone on the Solaris host, the zone name is checked by listing the process with the 'ps' bare command on the remote machine. An attacker could take advantage of this flaw by crafting the name of the zone and executing arbitrary commands in the remote host. Ansible Engine 2.7.15, 2.8.7, and 2.9.2 as well as previous versions are affected.Show less
2Oracle
Redhat
2Ovirt Engine
Virtualization
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 24, 2020
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
2.6 LOW· v2
An Open redirect vulnerability was found in ovirt-engine versions 4.4 and earlier, where it allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and attempt phishing attacks. Once the target has opened the ma...Show more
An Open redirect vulnerability was found in ovirt-engine versions 4.4 and earlier, where it allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and attempt phishing attacks. Once the target has opened the malicious URL in their browser, the critical part of the URL is no longer visible. The highest threat from this vulnerability is on confidentiality.Show less
6Canonical
DebianLinux+3 more
10Active Iq Unified Manager
Cloud BackupDebian Linux+7 more
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 19, 2020
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
7.2 HIGH· v2
A flaw null pointer dereference in the Linux kernel cgroupv2 subsystem in versions before 5.7.10 was found in the way when reboot the system. A local user could use this flaw to crash the system or escalate their privile...Show more
A flaw null pointer dereference in the Linux kernel cgroupv2 subsystem in versions before 5.7.10 was found in the way when reboot the system. A local user could use this flaw to crash the system or escalate their privileges on the system.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A high severity vulnerability was found in all active versions of Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0. The out of band OS command injection vulnerability can be exploited by authenticated attacker while setuping conversio...Show more
A high severity vulnerability was found in all active versions of Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0. The out of band OS command injection vulnerability can be exploited by authenticated attacker while setuping conversion host through Infrastructure Migration Solution. This flaw allows attacker to execute arbitrary commands on CloudForms server.Show less
1Redhat
1Quay
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
An information disclosure vulnerability was found in Red Hat Quay in versions before 3.3.1. This flaw allows an attacker who can create a build trigger in a repository, to disclose the names of robot accounts and the exi...Show more
An information disclosure vulnerability was found in Red Hat Quay in versions before 3.3.1. This flaw allows an attacker who can create a build trigger in a repository, to disclose the names of robot accounts and the existence of private repositories within any namespace.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 was vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw. With the access to add Ansible Tower provider, an attacker could scan and attack systems from the internal network which are not nor...Show more
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 was vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw. With the access to add Ansible Tower provider, an attacker could scan and attack systems from the internal network which are not normally accessible.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.9 MEDIUM· v2
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by CSV Injection flaw, a crafted payload stays dormant till a victim export as CSV and opens the file with Excel. Once the victim opens the file, the formula executes, triggering...Show more
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by CSV Injection flaw, a crafted payload stays dormant till a victim export as CSV and opens the file with Excel. Once the victim opens the file, the formula executes, triggering any number of possible events. While this is strictly not an flaw that affects the application directly, attackers could use the loosely validated parameters to trigger several attack possibilities.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0 was vulnerable to the User Impersonation authorization flaw which allows malicious attacker to create existent and non-existent role-based access control user, with groups and roles. Wi...Show more
Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0 was vulnerable to the User Impersonation authorization flaw which allows malicious attacker to create existent and non-existent role-based access control user, with groups and roles. With a selected group of EvmGroup-super_administrator, an attacker can perform any API request as a super administrator.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by a role-based privilege escalation flaw. An attacker with EVM-Operator group can perform actions restricted only to EVM-Super-administrator group, leads to, exporting or importi...Show more
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by a role-based privilege escalation flaw. An attacker with EVM-Operator group can perform actions restricted only to EVM-Super-administrator group, leads to, exporting or importing administrator files.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 leads to insecure direct object references (IDOR) and functional level access control bypass due to missing privilege check. Therefore, if an attacker knows the right criteria, it is possible...Show more
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 leads to insecure direct object references (IDOR) and functional level access control bypass due to missing privilege check. Therefore, if an attacker knows the right criteria, it is possible to access some sensitive data within the CloudForms.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
6.0 MEDIUM· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
In Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5, the read only widgets can be edited by inspecting the forms and dropping the disabled attribute from the fields since there is no server-side validation. This business logic flaw violate...Show more
In Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5, the read only widgets can be edited by inspecting the forms and dropping the disabled attribute from the fields since there is no server-side validation. This business logic flaw violate the expected behavior.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 11, 2020
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
3.5 LOW· v2
A cross-site scripting flaw was found in Report Menu feature of Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5. An attacker could use this flaw to execute a stored XSS attack on an application administrator using CloudForms.
7Apache
CanonicalDebian+4 more
25Communications Element Manager
Communications Session Report ManagerCommunications Session Route Manager+22 more
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 7, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Confi...Show more
Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Configuring the HTTP/2 feature via "H2Push off" will mitigate this vulnerability for unpatched servers.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Redhat
2Etcd
Fedora
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 6, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
In ectd before versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23, gateway TLS authentication is only applied to endpoints detected in DNS SRV records. When starting a gateway, TLS authentication will only be attempted on endpoints identified i...Show more
In ectd before versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23, gateway TLS authentication is only applied to endpoints detected in DNS SRV records. When starting a gateway, TLS authentication will only be attempted on endpoints identified in DNS SRV records for a given domain, which occurs in the discoverEndpoints function. No authentication is performed against endpoints provided in the --endpoints flag. This has been fixed in versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23 with improved documentation and deprecation of the functionality.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Redhat
2Etcd
Fedora
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 6, 2020
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, the etcd gateway is a simple TCP proxy to allow for basic service discovery and access. However, it is possible to include the gateway address as an endpoint. This results in a...Show more
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, the etcd gateway is a simple TCP proxy to allow for basic service discovery and access. However, it is possible to include the gateway address as an endpoint. This results in a denial of service, since the endpoint can become stuck in a loop of requesting itself until there are no more available file descriptors to accept connections on the gateway.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Redhat
2Etcd
Fedora
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 6, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10 does not perform any password length validation, which allows for very short passwords, such as those with a length of one. This may allow an attacker to guess or brute-force users'...Show more
etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10 does not perform any password length validation, which allows for very short passwords, such as those with a length of one. This may allow an attacker to guess or brute-force users' passwords with little computational effort.Show less
1Redhat
2Amq Online
Enmasse
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 3, 2020
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
It was found that the AMQ Online console is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploitable in cases where preflight checks are not instigated or bypassed. For example authorised users using an old...Show more
It was found that the AMQ Online console is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploitable in cases where preflight checks are not instigated or bypassed. For example authorised users using an older browser with Adobe Flash are vulnerable when targeted by an attacker. This flaw affects all versions of AMQ-Online prior to 1.5.2 and Enmasse versions 0.31.0-rc1 up until but not including 0.32.2.Show less
4Canonical
GnuOpensuse+1 more
7Enterprise Linux
Enterprise Linux EusEnterprise Linux Server Aus+4 more
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 31, 2020
N/A· v4
6.0 MEDIUM· v3
3.6 LOW· v2
There is an issue with grub2 before version 2.06 while handling symlink on ext filesystems. A filesystem containing a symbolic link with an inode size of UINT32_MAX causes an arithmetic overflow leading to a zero-sized m...Show more
There is an issue with grub2 before version 2.06 while handling symlink on ext filesystems. A filesystem containing a symbolic link with an inode size of UINT32_MAX causes an arithmetic overflow leading to a zero-sized memory allocation with subsequent heap-based buffer overflow.Show less
4Canonical
GnuOpensuse+1 more
7Enterprise Linux
Enterprise Linux EusEnterprise Linux Server Aus+4 more
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 31, 2020
N/A· v4
6.0 MEDIUM· v3
3.6 LOW· v2
There is an issue on grub2 before version 2.06 at function read_section_as_string(). It expects a font name to be at max UINT32_MAX - 1 length in bytes but it doesn't verify it before proceed with buffer allocation to re...Show more
There is an issue on grub2 before version 2.06 at function read_section_as_string(). It expects a font name to be at max UINT32_MAX - 1 length in bytes but it doesn't verify it before proceed with buffer allocation to read the value from the font value. An attacker may leverage that by crafting a malicious font file which has a name with UINT32_MAX, leading to read_section_as_string() to an arithmetic overflow, zero-sized allocation and further heap-based buffer overflow.Show less
1Redhat
1Ansible Tower
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 31, 2020
N/A· v4
5.8 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A data exposure flaw was found in Tower, where sensitive data was revealed from the HTTP return error codes. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve pages from the default organization and verify...Show more
A data exposure flaw was found in Tower, where sensitive data was revealed from the HTTP return error codes. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve pages from the default organization and verify existing usernames. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.Show less