Pulsesecure
pulsesecure
93 CVEs • 19 products
Products (19)
Click to collapseToggle
Products (19)
Click to collapse
CVEs (93)
CVE VENDORS PRODUCTS UPDATED PUBLISHED CVSS |
|---|
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Secure Desktop Client Nov 21, 2024 Nov 29, 2018 N/A· v4 5.5 MEDIUM· v3 5.8 MEDIUM· v2 Pulse Secure Desktop Client 5.3 up to and including R6.0 build 1769 on Windows has Insecure Permissions. |
5Artifex CanonicalDebian+2 more11Debian Linux Enterprise Linux DesktopEnterprise Linux Server+8 moreNov 21, 2024 Oct 19, 2018 N/A· v4 8.6 HIGH· v3 6.8 MEDIUM· v2 Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors involving the 1Policy operator. |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Secure Desktop Nov 21, 2024 Sep 12, 2018 N/A· v4 6.8 MEDIUM· v3 7.2 HIGH· v2 Pulse Secure Client 9.0R1 and 5.3RX before 5.3R5, when configured to authenticate VPN users during Windows Logon, can allow attackers to bypass Windows authentication and execute commands on the system with the privilege...Show more |
2Ivanti Pulsesecure3Connect Secure Pulse Connect SecurePulse Policy SecureNov 21, 2024 Sep 6, 2018 N/A· v4 9.8 CRITICAL· v3 7.5 HIGH· v2 A vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an ht...Show more |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Secure Desktop Client Nov 21, 2024 Sep 6, 2018 N/A· v4 6.8 MEDIUM· v3 4.6 MEDIUM· v2 In Pulse Secure Pulse Desktop Client 5.3RX before 5.3R5 and 9.0R1, there is a Privilege Escalation Vulnerability with Dynamic Certificate Trust. |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Secure Desktop Client Nov 21, 2024 Sep 6, 2018 N/A· v4 7.8 HIGH· v3 4.6 MEDIUM· v2 The Pulse Secure Desktop (macOS) has a Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Secure Desktop Client Nov 21, 2024 Sep 6, 2018 N/A· v4 5.5 MEDIUM· v3 2.1 LOW· v2 The Pulse Secure Desktop (macOS) 5.3RX before 5.3R5 and 9.0R1 has a Format String Vulnerability. |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Secure Desktop Client Nov 21, 2024 Sep 6, 2018 N/A· v4 5.3 MEDIUM· v3 4.6 MEDIUM· v2 The Pulse Secure Desktop (macOS) 5.3RX before 5.3R5 and 9.0R1 has a Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. |
2Ivanti Pulsesecure3Connect Secure Pulse Connect SecurePulse Policy SecureNov 21, 2024 Sep 6, 2018 N/A· v4 6.1 MEDIUM· v3 5.8 MEDIUM· v2 download.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1RX before 8.1R13 and 8.3RX before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure through 5.2RX before 5.2R10 and 5.4RX before 5.4R4 have an Open Redirect Vulnerability. |
4Artifex CanonicalDebian+1 more5Debian Linux GhostscriptGpl Ghostscript+2 moreNov 21, 2024 Sep 5, 2018 N/A· v4 7.8 HIGH· v3 6.8 MEDIUM· v2 In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the setcolor function to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. |
5Artifex CanonicalDebian+2 more11Debian Linux Enterprise Linux DesktopEnterprise Linux Server+8 moreNov 21, 2024 Aug 28, 2018 N/A· v4 7.8 HIGH· v3 6.8 MEDIUM· v2 In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript could use uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. |
5Artifex CanonicalDebian+2 more9Debian Linux Enterprise Linux DesktopEnterprise Linux Server+6 moreNov 21, 2024 Aug 27, 2018 N/A· v4 7.8 HIGH· v3 6.8 MEDIUM· v2 In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the LockDistillerParams parameter to crash the interpreter or execute code. |
5Artifex CanonicalDebian+2 more11Debian Linux Enterprise Linux DesktopEnterprise Linux Server+8 moreNov 21, 2024 Aug 27, 2018 N/A· v4 7.8 HIGH· v3 6.8 MEDIUM· v2 In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, a type confusion using the .shfill operator could be used by attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Connect Secure Nov 21, 2024 May 10, 2018 N/A· v4 5.5 MEDIUM· v3 4.3 MEDIUM· v2 Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1.x before 8.1R14, 8.2.x before 8.2R11, and 8.3.x before 8.3R5 do not properly process nested XML entities, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumpti...Show more |
1Pulsesecure 1Desktop Linux Client Nov 21, 2024 Jan 31, 2018 N/A· v4 6.5 MEDIUM· v3 6.4 MEDIUM· v2 The GUI component (aka PulseUI) in Pulse Secure Desktop Linux clients before PULSE5.2R9.2 and 5.3.x before PULSE5.3R4.2 does not perform strict SSL Certificate Validation. This can lead to the manipulation of the Pulse C...Show more |
1Pulsesecure 2Pulse Connect Secure Pulse Policy SecureNov 21, 2024 Jan 16, 2018 N/A· v4 9.8 CRITICAL· v3 7.5 HIGH· v2 A stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability exists in the web server in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.4R4, leading to memory corruption and possibly remote co...Show more |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Connect Secure Nov 21, 2024 Jan 16, 2018 N/A· v4 4.8 MEDIUM· v3 3.5 LOW· v2 A cross site scripting issue has been found in custompage.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.0R17.0, 8.1.x before 8.1R13, 8.2.x before 8.2R9, and 8.3.x before 8.3R3 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) befo...Show more |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse One On Premise May 13, 2026 Sep 30, 2017 N/A· v4 7.5 HIGH· v3 5.0 MEDIUM· v2 Pulse Secure Pulse One On-Premise 2.0.1649 and below does not properly validate requests, which allows remote users to query and obtain sensitive information. |
2Ivanti Pulsesecure3Connect Secure Pulse Connect SecurePulse Policy SecureMay 13, 2026 Aug 29, 2017 N/A· v4 8.8 HIGH· v3 6.8 MEDIUM· v2 diag.cgi in Pulse Connect Secure 8.2R1 through 8.2R5, 8.1R1 through 8.1R10 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.3R1 through 5.3R5, 5.2R1 through 5.2R8, and 5.1R1 through 5.1R10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of...Show more |
1Pulsesecure 1Pulse Connect Secure May 13, 2026 Jul 12, 2017 N/A· v4 8.8 HIGH· v3 6.8 MEDIUM· v2 Pulse Connect Secure 8.3R1 has CSRF in logout.cgi. The logout function of the admin panel is not protected by any CSRF tokens, thus allowing an attacker to logout a user by making them visit a malicious web page. |