Ibm

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6 and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3006.Show less

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3008.Show less

The JMX Remoting functionality in Apache Geronimo 3.x before 3.0.1, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Community Edition 3.0.0.3 and other products, does not properly implement the RMI classloader, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by using the JMX connector to send a crafted serialized object.Show less

The TFTP client in IBM AIX 6.1 and 7.1, and VIOS 2.2.2.2-FP-26 SP-02, when RBAC is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended file-ownership restrictions, and read or overwrite arbitrary files, via unspecified vectors.Show less

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) 7.5.1.x, 8.0.0.x, and 8.0.1 before FP1 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) ProcessPortal/jsp/socialPortal/dashboard.jsp, (2) teamworks/executeServiceByName, (3) portal/jsp/viewAdHocReportWizard.do, or (4) rest/bpm/wle/v1/process.Show less

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567.Show less

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567.Show less

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567.Show less

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567.Show less

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, and CVE-2013-0475.Show less

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-5766.Show less

An unspecified third-party component in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 uses short session ID values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack sessions, and consequently obtain sensitive information, via a brute-force attack.Show less

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 do not properly restrict file types and extensions, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted filename.Show less