← Back

Google

google

14,696 CVEs • 239 products

Products (239)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Android
android
Chrome
chrome
Tensorflow
tensorflow
Chrome Os
chrome_os
V8
v8
Asylo
asylo
Blink
blink
Picasa
picasa
Sketchup
sketchup
Tunnelblick
tunnelblick
Gvisor
gvisor
Toolbar
toolbar
Web Toolkit
web_toolkit
Protobuf
protobuf
Rendertron
rendertron
Fuchsia
fuchsia
Protobuf Java
protobuf-java
Earth
earth
Fscrypt
fscrypt
Gerrit
gerrit
Android Sdk
android_sdk
Guava
guava
Monorail
monorail
Guest Oslogin
guest-oslogin
Web Designer
web_designer
Talk
talk
Desktop
desktop
Bionic
bionic
Mod Pagespeed
mod_pagespeed
Home Firmware
home_firmware
Flatbuffers
flatbuffers
Bazel
bazel
Web Stories
web_stories
Updater
updater
Nearby
nearby
Api Search
api_search
Matter
matter
Kml
kml
Google Apps
google_apps
Gears
gears
Idapython
idapython
Admob
admob
Checkout Php
checkout-php
Cityhash
cityhash
Chrome Frame
chrome_frame
Authenticator
authenticator
Glass
glass
Android Api
android_api
Email
email
Android One
android_one
Sfntly
sfntly
Skia
skia
Pdfium
pdfium
Gmail
gmail
Santa
santa
Boringssl
boringssl
Cardboard
cardboard
Snappy
snappy
Api C++ Client
api_c++_client
Voice Builder
voice_builder
Gizmo5
gizmo5
Native Client
native_client
Openthread
openthread

CVEs (14,696)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
3Debian
FedoraprojectGoogle
3Chrome
Debian LinuxFedora
Jun 17, 2026
May 3, 2023
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Use after free in OS Inputs in Google Chrome on ChromeOS prior to 113.0.5672.63 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to enage in specific UI interaction to potentially exploit heap corruption via crafted UI int...Show more
Use after free in OS Inputs in Google Chrome on ChromeOS prior to 113.0.5672.63 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to enage in specific UI interaction to potentially exploit heap corruption via crafted UI interaction. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
3Debian
FedoraprojectGoogle
3Chrome
Debian LinuxFedora
Jun 17, 2026
May 3, 2023
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 113.0.5672.63 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to bypass file access checks via a crafted HTML p...Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 113.0.5672.63 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to bypass file access checks via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
3Debian
FedoraprojectGoogle
3Chrome
Debian LinuxFedora
Jun 17, 2026
May 3, 2023
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Prompts in Google Chrome prior to 113.0.5672.63 allowed a remote attacker to bypass permission restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
1Google
1Espv2
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 26, 2023
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
ESPv2 is a service proxy that provides API management capabilities using Google Service Infrastructure. ESPv2 2.20.0 through 2.42.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability. API clients can craft a malicious `X-HT...Show more
ESPv2 is a service proxy that provides API management capabilities using Google Service Infrastructure. ESPv2 2.20.0 through 2.42.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability. API clients can craft a malicious `X-HTTP-Method-Override` header value to bypass JWT authentication in specific cases. ESPv2 allows malicious requests to bypass authentication if both the conditions are true: The requested HTTP method is **not** in the API service definition (OpenAPI spec or gRPC `google.api.http` proto annotations, and the specified `X-HTTP-Method-Override` is a valid HTTP method in the API service definition. ESPv2 will forward the request to your backend without checking the JWT. Attackers can craft requests with a malicious `X-HTTP-Method-Override` value that allows them to bypass specifying JWTs. Restricting API access with API keys works as intended and is not affected by this vulnerability. Upgrade deployments to release v2.43.0 or higher to receive a patch. This release ensures that JWT authentication occurs, even when the caller specifies `x-http-method-override`. `x-http-method-override` is still supported by v2.43.0+. API clients can continue sending this header to ESPv2.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In inflate of inflate.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not nee...Show more
In inflate of inflate.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-242544249Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple methods of PackageInstallerSession.java, there is a possible way to start foreground services from the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no add...Show more
In multiple methods of PackageInstallerSession.java, there is a possible way to start foreground services from the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-243377226Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple functions of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible loading of arbitrary code into the System Settings app due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additiona...Show more
In multiple functions of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible loading of arbitrary code into the System Settings app due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-260567867Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In toUriInner of Intent.java, there is a possible way to launch an arbitrary activity due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User intera...Show more
In toUriInner of Intent.java, there is a possible way to launch an arbitrary activity due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-261858325Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In OnWakelockReleased of attribution_processor.cc, there is a use after free that could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Produc...Show more
In OnWakelockReleased of attribution_processor.cc, there is a use after free that could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-254774758Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In sanitize of LayerState.cpp, there is a possible way to take over the screen display and swap the display content due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional e...Show more
In sanitize of LayerState.cpp, there is a possible way to take over the screen display and swap the display content due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-248031255Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In extractRelativePath of FileUtils.java, there is a possible way to access files in a directory belonging to other applications due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no add...Show more
In extractRelativePath of FileUtils.java, there is a possible way to access files in a directory belonging to other applications due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-228450832Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In retrieveServiceLocked of ActiveServices.java, there is a possible way to dynamically register a BroadcastReceiver using permissions of System App due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation o...Show more
In retrieveServiceLocked of ActiveServices.java, there is a possible way to dynamically register a BroadcastReceiver using permissions of System App due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-242040055Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In canDisplayLocalUi of AppLocalePickerActivity.java, there is a possible way to change system app locales due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service across user boundaries with no addi...Show more
In canDisplayLocalUi of AppLocalePickerActivity.java, there is a possible way to change system app locales due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service across user boundaries with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-257954050Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
5.0 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In parseUsesPermission of ParsingPackageUtils.java, there is a possible boot loop due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is...Show more
In parseUsesPermission of ParsingPackageUtils.java, there is a possible boot loop due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-259942609Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In startInstrumentation of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible way to keep the foreground service alive while the app is in the background. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional...Show more
In startInstrumentation of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible way to keep the foreground service alive while the app is in the background. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-237766679Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In deliverOnFlushComplete of LocationProviderManager.java, there is a possible way to bypass background activity launch restrictions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with...Show more
In deliverOnFlushComplete of LocationProviderManager.java, there is a possible way to bypass background activity launch restrictions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-235823542Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In PreferencesHelper.java, an uncaught exception may cause the device to get stuck in a boot loop. This could lead to local persistent denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is...Show more
In PreferencesHelper.java, an uncaught exception may cause the device to get stuck in a boot loop. This could lead to local persistent denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-261723753Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In isToggleable of SecureNfcEnabler.java and SecureNfcPreferenceController.java, there is a possible way to enable NFC from a secondary account due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privileg...Show more
In isToggleable of SecureNfcEnabler.java and SecureNfcPreferenceController.java, there is a possible way to enable NFC from a secondary account due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege from the Guest account with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-238298970Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In nci_snd_set_routing_cmd of nci_hmsgs.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges need...Show more
In nci_snd_set_routing_cmd of nci_hmsgs.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-264879662Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 19, 2023
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In buildPropFile of filesystem.go, there is a possible insecure hash due to an improperly used crypto. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not nee...Show more
In buildPropFile of filesystem.go, there is a possible insecure hash due to an improperly used crypto. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-262892300Show less