← Back

Google

google

14,353 CVEs • 239 products

Products (239)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Android
android
Chrome
chrome
Tensorflow
tensorflow
Chrome Os
chrome_os
V8
v8
Asylo
asylo
Blink
blink
Picasa
picasa
Sketchup
sketchup
Tunnelblick
tunnelblick
Gvisor
gvisor
Toolbar
toolbar
Web Toolkit
web_toolkit
Protobuf
protobuf
Rendertron
rendertron
Fuchsia
fuchsia
Protobuf Java
protobuf-java
Earth
earth
Fscrypt
fscrypt
Gerrit
gerrit
Android Sdk
android_sdk
Guava
guava
Monorail
monorail
Guest Oslogin
guest-oslogin
Web Designer
web_designer
Talk
talk
Desktop
desktop
Bionic
bionic
Mod Pagespeed
mod_pagespeed
Home Firmware
home_firmware
Flatbuffers
flatbuffers
Bazel
bazel
Web Stories
web_stories
Updater
updater
Nearby
nearby
Api Search
api_search
Matter
matter
Kml
kml
Google Apps
google_apps
Gears
gears
Idapython
idapython
Admob
admob
Checkout Php
checkout-php
Cityhash
cityhash
Chrome Frame
chrome_frame
Authenticator
authenticator
Glass
glass
Android Api
android_api
Email
email
Android One
android_one
Sfntly
sfntly
Skia
skia
Pdfium
pdfium
Gmail
gmail
Santa
santa
Boringssl
boringssl
Cardboard
cardboard
Snappy
snappy
Api C++ Client
api_c++_client
Voice Builder
voice_builder
Gizmo5
gizmo5
Native Client
native_client
Openthread
openthread

CVEs (14,353)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In pmucal_rae_handle_seq_int of flexpmu_cal_rae.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User int...Show more
In pmucal_rae_handle_seq_int of flexpmu_cal_rae.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In ufshc_scsi_cmd of ufs.c, there is a possible stack variable use after free due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is...Show more
In ufshc_scsi_cmd of ufs.c, there is a possible stack variable use after free due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
there is a possible privilege escalation due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In ProtocolMiscHwConfigChangeAdapter::GetData() of protocolmiscadapter.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with baseband firmware com...Show more
In ProtocolMiscHwConfigChangeAdapter::GetData() of protocolmiscadapter.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with baseband firmware compromise required. User Interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Android before 2024-10-05 on Google Pixel devices allows privilege escalation in the ABL component, A-330537292.
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In pmucal_rae_handle_seq_int of flexpmu_cal_rae.c, there is a possible arbitrary write due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User inte...Show more
In pmucal_rae_handle_seq_int of flexpmu_cal_rae.c, there is a possible arbitrary write due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In mm_GetMobileIdIndexForNsUpdate of mm_GmmPduCodec.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges ne...Show more
In mm_GetMobileIdIndexForNsUpdate of mm_GmmPduCodec.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
there is a possible Null Pointer Dereference (modem crash) due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for...Show more
there is a possible Null Pointer Dereference (modem crash) due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Android before 2024-10-05 on Google Pixel devices allows information disclosure in the modem component, A-299774545.
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
There is a possible Local bypass of user interaction due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for ex...Show more
There is a possible Local bypass of user interaction due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In lwis_device_event_states_clear_locked of lwis_event.c, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a double free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. Us...Show more
In lwis_device_event_states_clear_locked of lwis_event.c, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a double free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 22, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.69 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 22, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.69 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 22, 2024
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.69 allowed a remote attacker to bypass site isolation via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: High)
1Google
1Migrate To Containers
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
5.9 MEDIUM· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
There exists an insecure default user permission in Google Cloud Migrate to containers from version 1.1.0 to 1.2.2 Windows installs. A local "m2cuser" was greated with administrator privileges. This posed a security risk...Show more
There exists an insecure default user permission in Google Cloud Migrate to containers from version 1.1.0 to 1.2.2 Windows installs. A local "m2cuser" was greated with administrator privileges. This posed a security risk if the "analyze" or "generate" commands were interrupted or skipping the action to delete the local user “m2cuser”. We recommend upgrading to 1.2.3 or beyondShow less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Navigations in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient data validation in DevTools in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML pa...Show more
Insufficient data validation in DevTools in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Payments in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Ch...Show more
Inappropriate implementation in Payments in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient data validation in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium...Show more
Insufficient data validation in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromi...Show more
Inappropriate implementation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.58 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less