← Back

Fedoraproject

fedoraproject

5,448 CVEs • 20 products

Products (20)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Fedora
fedora
Sssd
sssd
Fedora Core
fedora_core
Commons
commons
Coolkey
coolkey
Anaconda
anaconda
Crypto Utils
crypto-utils
Arm Installer
arm_installer
Fedmsg
fedmsg
Python Fedora
python-fedora
Sectool
sectool
Selinux Policy
selinux-policy
Supybot Fedora
supybot-fedora
Unbound
unbound
Atomic
atomic

CVEs (5,448)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
8Canonical
DebianFedoraproject+5 more
8Clustered Data Ontap
Communications Diameter Signaling RouterDebian Linux+5 more
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.34, 7.3.x below 7.3.23 and 7.4.x below 7.4.11, when AES-CCM mode is used with openssl_encrypt() function with 12 bytes IV, only first 7 bytes of the IV is actually used. This can lead to b...Show more
In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.34, 7.3.x below 7.3.23 and 7.4.x below 7.4.11, when AES-CCM mode is used with openssl_encrypt() function with 12 bytes IV, only first 7 bytes of the IV is actually used. This can lead to both decreased security and incorrect encryption data.Show less
3Artifex
DebianFedoraproject
3Debian Linux
FedoraMupdf
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2020
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Artifex MuPDF before 1.18.0 has a heap based buffer over-write when parsing JBIG2 files allowing attackers to cause a denial of service.
4Apache
FedoraprojectGradle+1 more
37Agile Engineering Data Management
AntApi Gateway+34 more
Oct 8, 2026
Oct 1, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
As mitigation for CVE-2020-1945 Apache Ant 1.10.8 changed the permissions of temporary files it created so that only the current user was allowed to access them. Unfortunately the fixcrlf task deleted the temporary file...Show more
As mitigation for CVE-2020-1945 Apache Ant 1.10.8 changed the permissions of temporary files it created so that only the current user was allowed to access them. Unfortunately the fixcrlf task deleted the temporary file and created a new one without said protection, effectively nullifying the effort. This would still allow an attacker to inject modified source files into the build process.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectLibproxy Project+1 more
4Debian Linux
FedoraLeap+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 30, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
url.cpp in libproxy through 0.4.15 is prone to a buffer overflow when PAC is enabled, as demonstrated by a large PAC file that is delivered without a Content-length header.
2Fedoraproject
Goxmldsig Project
2Fedora
Goxmldsig
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 29, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
In goxmldsig (XML Digital Signatures implemented in pure Go) before version 1.1.0, with a carefully crafted XML file, an attacker can completely bypass signature validation and pass off an altered file as a signed one. A...Show more
In goxmldsig (XML Digital Signatures implemented in pure Go) before version 1.1.0, with a carefully crafted XML file, an attacker can completely bypass signature validation and pass off an altered file as a signed one. A patch is available, all users of goxmldsig should upgrade to at least revision f6188febf0c29d7ffe26a0436212b19cb9615e64 or version 1.1.0Show less
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in the FileImporter extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4. An attacker can import a file even when the target page is protected against "page creation" and the attacker should not be able to creat...Show more
An issue was discovered in the FileImporter extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4. An attacker can import a file even when the target page is protected against "page creation" and the attacker should not be able to create it. This occurs because of a mishandled distinction between an upload restriction and a create restriction. An attacker cannot leverage this to overwrite anything, but can leverage this to force a wiki to have a page with a disallowed title.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
XSS exists in the MobileFrontend extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4 because section.line is mishandled during regex section line replacement from PageGateway. Using crafted HTML, an attacker can elicit an XSS attack v...Show more
XSS exists in the MobileFrontend extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4 because section.line is mishandled during regex section line replacement from PageGateway. Using crafted HTML, an attacker can elicit an XSS attack via jQuery's parseHTML method, which can cause image callbacks to fire even without the element being appended to the DOM.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An information leak was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4. Handling of actor ID does not necessarily use the correct database or correct wiki.
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4. The non-jqueryMsg version of mw.message().parse() doesn't escape HTML. This affects both message contents (which are generally...Show more
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4. The non-jqueryMsg version of mw.message().parse() doesn't escape HTML. This affects both message contents (which are generally safe) and the parameters (which can be based on user input). (When jqueryMsg is loaded, it correctly accepts only whitelisted tags in message contents, and escapes all parameters. Situations with an unloaded jqueryMsg are rare in practice, but can for example occur for Special:SpecialPages on a wiki with no extensions installed.)Show less
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in the OATHAuth extension in MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4. For Wikis using OATHAuth on a farm/cluster (such as via CentralAuth), rate limiting of OATH tokens is...Show more
An issue was discovered in the OATHAuth extension in MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4. For Wikis using OATHAuth on a farm/cluster (such as via CentralAuth), rate limiting of OATH tokens is only done on a single site level. Thus, multiple requests can be made across many wikis/sites concurrently.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4. LogEventList::getFiltersDesc is insecurely using message text to build options names for an HTML multi-select field. The relevant code should use...Show more
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4. LogEventList::getFiltersDesc is insecurely using message text to build options names for an HTML multi-select field. The relevant code should use escaped() instead of text().Show less
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
In MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4, XSS related to jQuery can occur. The attacker creates a message with [javascript:payload xss] and turns it into a jQuery object with mw.message().parse...Show more
In MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4, XSS related to jQuery can occur. The attacker creates a message with [javascript:payload xss] and turns it into a jQuery object with mw.message().parse(). The expected result is that the jQuery object does not contain an <a> tag (or it does not have a href attribute, or it's empty, etc.). The actual result is that the object contains an <a href ="javascript... that executes when clicked.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
In MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4, Special:UserRights exposes the existence of hidden users.
2Fedoraproject
Mediawiki
2Fedora
Mediawiki
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki 1.34.x before 1.34.4. On Special:Contributions, the NS filter uses unescaped messages as keys in the option key for an HTMLForm specifier. This is vulnerable to a mild XSS if one of t...Show more
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki 1.34.x before 1.34.4. On Special:Contributions, the NS filter uses unescaped messages as keys in the option key for an HTMLForm specifier. This is vulnerable to a mild XSS if one of those messages is changed to include raw HTML.Show less
7Canonical
DebianFedoraproject+4 more
8Debian Linux
FedoraHci Storage Node+5 more
Oct 14, 2026
Sep 27, 2020
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
http.client in Python 3.x before 3.5.10, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, 3.7.x before 3.7.9, and 3.8.x before 3.8.5 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF cont...Show more
http.client in Python 3.x before 3.5.10, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, 3.7.x before 3.7.9, and 3.8.x before 3.8.5 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of HTTPConnection.request.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectOpensuse+1 more
4Debian Linux
FedoraLeap+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 23, 2020
N/A· v4
4.7 MEDIUM· v3
1.9 LOW· v2
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is a race condition when migrating timers between x86 HVM vCPUs. When migrating timers of x86 HVM guests between its vCPUs, the locking model used allows for a second...Show more
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is a race condition when migrating timers between x86 HVM vCPUs. When migrating timers of x86 HVM guests between its vCPUs, the locking model used allows for a second vCPU of the same guest (also operating on the timers) to release a lock that it didn't acquire. The most likely effect of the issue is a hang or crash of the hypervisor, i.e., a Denial of Service (DoS). All versions of Xen are affected. Only x86 systems are vulnerable. Arm systems are not vulnerable. Only x86 HVM guests can leverage the vulnerability. x86 PV and PVH cannot leverage the vulnerability. Only guests with more than one vCPU can exploit the vulnerability.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectOpensuse+1 more
4Debian Linux
FedoraLeap+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 23, 2020
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There are missing memory barriers when accessing/allocating an event channel. Event channels control structures can be accessed lockless as long as the port is considered to...Show more
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There are missing memory barriers when accessing/allocating an event channel. Event channels control structures can be accessed lockless as long as the port is considered to be valid. Such a sequence is missing an appropriate memory barrier (e.g., smp_*mb()) to prevent both the compiler and CPU from re-ordering access. A malicious guest may be able to cause a hypervisor crash resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Information leak and privilege escalation cannot be excluded. Systems running all versions of Xen are affected. Whether a system is vulnerable will depend on the CPU and compiler used to build Xen. For all systems, the presence and the scope of the vulnerability depend on the precise re-ordering performed by the compiler used to build Xen. We have not been able to survey compilers; consequently we cannot say which compiler(s) might produce vulnerable code (with which code generation options). GCC documentation clearly suggests that re-ordering is possible. Arm systems will also be vulnerable if the CPU is able to re-order memory access. Please consult your CPU vendor. x86 systems are only vulnerable if a compiler performs re-ordering.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectOpensuse+1 more
4Debian Linux
FedoraLeap+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 23, 2020
N/A· v4
6.0 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. An x86 PV guest can trigger a host OS crash when handling guest access to MSR_MISC_ENABLE. When a guest accesses certain Model Specific Registers, Xen first reads the value...Show more
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. An x86 PV guest can trigger a host OS crash when handling guest access to MSR_MISC_ENABLE. When a guest accesses certain Model Specific Registers, Xen first reads the value from hardware to use as the basis for auditing the guest access. For the MISC_ENABLE MSR, which is an Intel specific MSR, this MSR read is performed without error handling for a #GP fault, which is the consequence of trying to read this MSR on non-Intel hardware. A buggy or malicious PV guest administrator can crash Xen, resulting in a host Denial of Service. Only x86 systems are vulnerable. ARM systems are not vulnerable. Only Xen versions 4.11 and onwards are vulnerable. 4.10 and earlier are not vulnerable. Only x86 systems that do not implement the MISC_ENABLE MSR (0x1a0) are vulnerable. AMD and Hygon systems do not implement this MSR and are vulnerable. Intel systems do implement this MSR and are not vulnerable. Other manufacturers have not been checked. Only x86 PV guests can exploit the vulnerability. x86 HVM/PVH guests cannot exploit the vulnerability.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectOpensuse+1 more
4Debian Linux
FedoraLeap+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 23, 2020
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.9 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is a lack of preemption in evtchn_reset() / evtchn_destroy(). In particular, the FIFO event channel model allows guests to have a large number of event channels active...Show more
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is a lack of preemption in evtchn_reset() / evtchn_destroy(). In particular, the FIFO event channel model allows guests to have a large number of event channels active at a time. Closing all of these (when resetting all event channels or when cleaning up after the guest) may take extended periods of time. So far, there was no arrangement for preemption at suitable intervals, allowing a CPU to spend an almost unbounded amount of time in the processing of these operations. Malicious or buggy guest kernels can mount a Denial of Service (DoS) attack affecting the entire system. All Xen versions are vulnerable in principle. Whether versions 4.3 and older are vulnerable depends on underlying hardware characteristics.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectOpensuse+1 more
4Debian Linux
FedoraLeap+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 23, 2020
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.9 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels f...Show more
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels for 32-bit x86 domains vs 64-bit or Arm (either bitness) ones. 32-bit x86 domains can use only 1023 channels, due to limited space in their shared (between guest and Xen) information structure, whereas all other domains can use up to 4095 in this model. The recording of the respective limit during domain initialization, however, has occurred at a time where domains are still deemed to be 64-bit ones, prior to actually honoring respective domain properties. At the point domains get recognized as 32-bit ones, the limit didn't get updated accordingly. Due to this misbehavior in Xen, 32-bit domains (including Domain 0) servicing other domains may observe event channel allocations to succeed when they should really fail. Subsequent use of such event channels would then possibly lead to corruption of other parts of the shared info structure. An unprivileged guest may cause another domain, in particular Domain 0, to misbehave. This may lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) for the entire system. All Xen versions from 4.4 onwards are vulnerable. Xen versions 4.3 and earlier are not vulnerable. Only x86 32-bit domains servicing other domains are vulnerable. Arm systems, as well as x86 64-bit domains, are not vulnerable.Show less