← Back

F5

f5

1,032 CVEs • 284 products

Products (284)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Nginx
nginx
Njs
njs
Nginx Plus
nginx_plus
Big Iq Cloud
big-iq_cloud
Big Iq Device
big-iq_device
F5os A
f5os-a
Iworkflow
iworkflow
Big Ip Dns
big-ip_dns
F5os C
f5os-c
Firepass
firepass
Tmos
tmos
Firepass 4100
firepass_4100
Big Iq Adc
big-iq_adc
Dos
dos
Waf
waf
Arx
arx
Arx Firmware
arx_firmware
F5 Iworkflow
f5_iworkflow
Big Ip
big-ip
Big Ip Edge
big-ip_edge
Big Ip Ltm
big-ip_ltm
Big Ip Afm
big-ip_afm
Big Ip Apm
big-ip_apm
Big Ip Asm
big-ip_asm
Big Ip Pem
big-ip_pem
Websafe
websafe
Nginx Unit
nginx_unit
Nginx Agent
nginx_agent
Big Ip Next
big-ip_next
Firepass 1000
firepass_1000
Firepass 1200
firepass_1200
Big Ip 1000
big-ip_1000
Big Ip 11000
big-ip_11000

CVEs (1,032)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1F5
13Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+10 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 25, 2019
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
3.3 LOW· v2
On versions 14.0.0-14.1.2, 13.0.0-13.1.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5, the BIG-IP system fails to perform Martian Address Filtering (As defined in RFC 1812 section 5.3.7) on the control plane (management interface)....Show more
On versions 14.0.0-14.1.2, 13.0.0-13.1.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5, the BIG-IP system fails to perform Martian Address Filtering (As defined in RFC 1812 section 5.3.7) on the control plane (management interface). This may allow attackers on an adjacent system to force BIG-IP into processing packets with spoofed source addresses.Show less
1F5
1Big Iq Centralized Management
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 25, 2019
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
3.5 LOW· v2
There is a Stored Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in the undisclosed page of a BIG-IQ 6.0.0-6.1.0 or 5.2.0-5.4.0 system. The attack can be stored by users granted the Device Manager and Administrator roles.
1F5
1Big Iq Centralized Management
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 25, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
In BIG-IQ 6.0.0-6.1.0, services for stats do not require authentication nor do they implement any form of Transport Layer Security (TLS).
1F5
16Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+13 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 25, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
In BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.1-11.6.4, BIG-IQ 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0,5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, the Configuration utility login p...Show more
In BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.1-11.6.4, BIG-IQ 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0,5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, the Configuration utility login page may not follow best security practices when handling a malicious request.Show less
3Canonical
F5Linux
3Linux Kernel
Traffix Signaling Delivery ControllerUbuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 23, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
In the Linux kernel before 5.2.14, rds6_inc_info_copy in net/rds/recv.c allows attackers to obtain sensitive information from kernel stack memory because tos and flags fields are not initialized.
1F5
1Big Ip Application Security Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 20, 2019
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
F5 BIG-IP ASM 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to be modified when using non...Show more
F5 BIG-IP ASM 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to be modified when using non-default settings.Show less
1F5
14Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+11 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 20, 2019
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
F5 BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to b...Show more
F5 BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to be modified when using non-default ConfigSync settings.Show less
1F5
14Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+11 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 4, 2019
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
On BIG-IP 11.5.2-11.6.4 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, REST users with guest privileges may be able to escalate their privileges and run commands with admin privileges.
1F5
13Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+10 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 4, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
On versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, and 11.5.2-11.6.4, an attacker sending specifically crafted DHCPv6 requests through a BIG-IP virtual server configured with a DHCPv6 profile m...Show more
On versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, and 11.5.2-11.6.4, an attacker sending specifically crafted DHCPv6 requests through a BIG-IP virtual server configured with a DHCPv6 profile may be able to cause the TMM process to produce a core file.Show less
1F5
13Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+10 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 4, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, when processing authentication attempts for control-plane users MCPD leaks a small amount of memory. Under rare conditions attack...Show more
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, when processing authentication attempts for control-plane users MCPD leaks a small amount of memory. Under rare conditions attackers with access to the management interface could eventually deplete memory on the system.Show less
1F5
13Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+10 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 4, 2019
N/A· v4
9.4 CRITICAL· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Similar to the issue identified in CVE-2018-12120, on versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, and 12.1.0-12.1.4 BIG-IP will bind a debug nodejs process to all interfaces when invoked. This may expose th...Show more
Similar to the issue identified in CVE-2018-12120, on versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, and 12.1.0-12.1.4 BIG-IP will bind a debug nodejs process to all interfaces when invoked. This may expose the process to unauthorized users if the plugin is left in debug mode and the port is accessible.Show less
2F5
Redhat
2Container Ingress Service
Openshift
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 4, 2019
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
1.9 LOW· v2
On version 1.9.0, If DEBUG logging is enable, F5 Container Ingress Service (CIS) for Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift (k8s-bigip-ctlr) log files may contain BIG-IP secrets such as SSL Private Keys and Private key Passphr...Show more
On version 1.9.0, If DEBUG logging is enable, F5 Container Ingress Service (CIS) for Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift (k8s-bigip-ctlr) log files may contain BIG-IP secrets such as SSL Private Keys and Private key Passphrases as provided as inputs by an AS3 Declaration.Show less
1F5
13Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Analytics+10 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 4, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, FTP traffic passing through a Virtual Server with both an active FTP profile associated and connection mirroring configured may lead to a TMM cras...Show more
On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, FTP traffic passing through a Virtual Server with both an active FTP profile associated and connection mirroring configured may lead to a TMM crash causing the configured HA action to be taken.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
19Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Linux+16 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman en...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
22Big Ip Local Traffic Manager
Debian LinuxDiskstation Manager+19 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.Show less
13Apache
AppleCanonical+10 more
28Big Ip Local Traffic Manager
Cloud InsightsDebian Linux+25 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream o...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
20Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Communications Broker+17 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that c...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
20Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Communications Broker+17 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified res...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.Show less
7Apple
CanonicalDebian+4 more
9Blockchain Platform
Debian LinuxLeap+6 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 26, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would o...Show more
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.Show less
5F5
LodashNetapp+2 more
21Active Iq Unified Manager
Banking Extensibility WorkbenchBig Ip Access Policy Manager+18 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 26, 2019
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload.