← Back

Canonical

canonical

4,252 CVEs • 60 products

Products (60)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Lxd
lxd
Juju
juju
Apport
apport
Snapd
snapd
Cloud Init
cloud-init
Multipass
multipass
Ubuntu Core
ubuntu_core
Ubuntu Touch
ubuntu_touch
Maas
maas
Subiquity
subiquity
Landscape
landscape
Authd
authd
Acpi Support
acpi-support
Ubuntu
ubuntu
Lxcfs
lxcfs
Spread
spread
Php5
php5
Telepathy Idle
telepathy-idle
Libpam Modules
libpam-modules
Reportbug
reportbug
Ubuntu Image
ubuntu-image
Bazaar
bazaar
Selinux
selinux
Apparmor
apparmor
Ubuntu Cobbler
ubuntu_cobbler
Microk8s
microk8s
C Kernel
c-kernel
Whoopsie
whoopsie
Checkinstall
checkinstall
Ppp
ppp
Snapcraft
snapcraft
Pebble
pebble
Netplan
netplan
Anbox Cloud
anbox_cloud
Juju/utils
juju/utils
Pdfunite
pdfunite

CVEs (4,252)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Canonical
1Lxd
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
3.8 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Mark Laing discovered in LXD's PKI mode, until version 5.21.1, that a restricted certificate could be added to the trust store with its restrictions not honoured.
1Canonical
1Lxd
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
3.8 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Mark Laing discovered that LXD's PKI mode, until version 5.21.2, could be bypassed if the client's certificate was present in the trust store.
1Canonical
1Authd
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 10, 2024
N/A· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Authd, through version 0.3.6, did not sufficiently randomize user IDs to prevent collisions. A local attacker who can register user names could spoof another user's ID and gain their privileges.
1Canonical
1Authd
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 3, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Authd PAM module before version 0.3.5 can allow broker-managed users to impersonate any other user managed by the same broker and perform any PAM operation with it, including authenticating as them.
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerable juju introspection abstract UNIX domain socket. An abstract UNIX domain socket responsible for introspection is available without authentication locally to network namespace users. This enables denial of servi...Show more
Vulnerable juju introspection abstract UNIX domain socket. An abstract UNIX domain socket responsible for introspection is available without authentication locally to network namespace users. This enables denial of service attacks.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerable juju hook tool abstract UNIX domain socket. When combined with an attack of JUJU_CONTEXT_ID, any user on the local system with access to the default network namespace may connect to the @/var/lib/juju/agents/u...Show more
Vulnerable juju hook tool abstract UNIX domain socket. When combined with an attack of JUJU_CONTEXT_ID, any user on the local system with access to the default network namespace may connect to the @/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-xxxx-yyyy/agent.socket and perform actions that are normally reserved to a juju charm.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2024
N/A· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
JUJU_CONTEXT_ID is a predictable authentication secret. On a Juju machine (non-Kubernetes) or Juju charm container (on Kubernetes), an unprivileged user in the same network namespace can connect to an abstract domain soc...Show more
JUJU_CONTEXT_ID is a predictable authentication secret. On a Juju machine (non-Kubernetes) or Juju charm container (on Kubernetes), an unprivileged user in the same network namespace can connect to an abstract domain socket and guess the JUJU_CONTEXT_ID value. This gives the unprivileged user access to the same information and tools as the Juju charm.Show less
1Canonical
1Anbox Cloud
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 18, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Anbox Management Service, in versions 1.17.0 through 1.23.0, does not validate the TLS certificate provided to it by the Anbox Stream Agent. An attacker must be able to machine-in-the-middle the Anbox Stream Agent from w...Show more
Anbox Management Service, in versions 1.17.0 through 1.23.0, does not validate the TLS certificate provided to it by the Anbox Stream Agent. An attacker must be able to machine-in-the-middle the Anbox Stream Agent from within an internal network before they can attempt to take advantage of this.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 29, 2024
N/A· v4
3.8 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Juju that resulted in the leak of the sensitive context ID, which allows a local unprivileged attacker to access other sensitive data or relation accessible to the local charm.
1Canonical
1Snapd
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the destination of symbolic links when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain symbolic links and other file...Show more
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the destination of symbolic links when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain symbolic links and other file types. Various file entries within the snap squashfs image (such as icons and desktop files etc) are directly read by snapd when it is extracted. An attacker who could convince a user to install a malicious snap which contained symbolic links at these paths could then cause snapd to write out the contents of the symbolic link destination into a world-readable directory. This in-turn could allow an unprivileged user to gain access to privileged information.Show less
1Canonical
1Snapd
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 25, 2024
N/A· v4
6.6 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the file type when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain files that are non-regular files (such as pipes or...Show more
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the file type when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain files that are non-regular files (such as pipes or sockets etc). Various file entries within the snap squashfs image (such as icons etc) are directly read by snapd when it is extracted. An attacker who could convince a user to install a malicious snap which contained non-regular files at these paths could then cause snapd to block indefinitely trying to read from such files and cause a denial of service.Show less
1Canonical
1Snapd
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 25, 2024
N/A· v4
8.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, when using AppArmor for enforcement of sandbox permissions, snapd failed to restrict writes to the $HOME/bin path. In Ubuntu, when this path exists, it is automatically added to the user...Show more
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, when using AppArmor for enforcement of sandbox permissions, snapd failed to restrict writes to the $HOME/bin path. In Ubuntu, when this path exists, it is automatically added to the users PATH. An attacker who could convince a user to install a malicious snap which used the 'home' plug could use this vulnerability to install arbitrary scripts into the users PATH which may then be run by the user outside of the expected snap sandbox and hence allow them to escape confinement.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Desktop Provision
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 23, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in provd before version 0.1.5 with a setuid binary, which allows a local attacker to escalate their privilege.
13Almalinux
AmazonApple+10 more
53500f Firmware
8300 Firmware8700 Firmware+50 more
Oct 15, 2026
Jul 1, 2024
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A security regression (CVE-2006-5051) was discovered in OpenSSH's server (sshd). There is a race condition which can lead sshd to handle some signals in an unsafe manner. An unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able t...Show more
A security regression (CVE-2006-5051) was discovered in OpenSSH's server (sshd). There is a race condition which can lead sshd to handle some signals in an unsafe manner. An unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able to trigger it by failing to authenticate within a set time period.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Advantage Desktop Daemon
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 27, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Marco Trevisan discovered that the Ubuntu Advantage Desktop Daemon, before version 1.12, leaks the Pro token to unprivileged users by passing the token as an argument in plaintext.
1Canonical
2Snapd
Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 21, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
When generating the systemd service units for the docker snap (and other similar snaps), snapd does not specify Delegate=yes - as a result systemd will move processes from the containers created and managed by these snap...Show more
When generating the systemd service units for the docker snap (and other similar snaps), snapd does not specify Delegate=yes - as a result systemd will move processes from the containers created and managed by these snaps into the cgroup of the main daemon within the snap itself when reloading system units. This may grant additional privileges to a container within the snap that were not originally intended.Show less
1Canonical
1Netplan
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 7, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
netplan leaks the private key of wireguard to local users. Versions after 1.0 are not affected.
2Apport Project
Canonical
2Apport
Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 4, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apport argument parsing mishandles filename splitting on older kernels resulting in argument spoofing
2Apport Project
Canonical
2Apport
Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 4, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Apport does not disable python crash handler before entering chroot
2Apport Project
Canonical
2Apport
Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 4, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
is_closing_session() allows users to consume RAM in the Apport process