← Back

Canonical

canonical

4,238 CVEs • 60 products

Products (60)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Lxd
lxd
Juju
juju
Apport
apport
Snapd
snapd
Cloud Init
cloud-init
Multipass
multipass
Ubuntu Core
ubuntu_core
Ubuntu Touch
ubuntu_touch
Maas
maas
Subiquity
subiquity
Landscape
landscape
Authd
authd
Acpi Support
acpi-support
Ubuntu
ubuntu
Lxcfs
lxcfs
Spread
spread
Php5
php5
Telepathy Idle
telepathy-idle
Libpam Modules
libpam-modules
Reportbug
reportbug
Ubuntu Image
ubuntu-image
Bazaar
bazaar
Selinux
selinux
Apparmor
apparmor
Ubuntu Cobbler
ubuntu_cobbler
Microk8s
microk8s
C Kernel
c-kernel
Whoopsie
whoopsie
Checkinstall
checkinstall
Ppp
ppp
Snapcraft
snapcraft
Pebble
pebble
Netplan
netplan
Anbox Cloud
anbox_cloud
Juju/utils
juju/utils
Pdfunite
pdfunite

CVEs (4,238)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Canonical
1Linux Bluefield
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 31, 2025
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Running DDoS on tcp port 22 will trigger a kernel crash. This issue is introduced by the backport of a commit regarding nft_lookup without the subsequent fixes that were introduced after this commit. The resolution of th...Show more
Running DDoS on tcp port 22 will trigger a kernel crash. This issue is introduced by the backport of a commit regarding nft_lookup without the subsequent fixes that were introduced after this commit. The resolution of this CVE introduces those commits to the linux-bluefield package.Show less
1Canonical
2Accountsservice
Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 25, 2025
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
accountsservice no longer drops permissions when writting .pam_environment
3Canonical
DebianOpenbsd
3Debian Linux
OpensshUbuntu Linux
Jun 30, 2026
Feb 28, 2025
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange...Show more
A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 31, 2025
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An authenticated user who has read access to the juju controller model, may construct a remote request to download an arbitrary file from the controller's filesystem.
2Canonical
Gnome
2Gnome Remote Desktop
Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 31, 2025
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu's configuration of gnome-control-center allowed Remote Desktop Sharing to be enabled by default.
1Canonical
1Apport
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 31, 2025
N/A· v4
3.1 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
gdbus setgid privilege escalation
1Canonical
1Apport
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 31, 2025
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Users can consume unlimited disk space in /var/crash
1Canonical
1Lxd
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
3.8 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Mark Laing discovered in LXD's PKI mode, until version 5.21.1, that a restricted certificate could be added to the trust store with its restrictions not honoured.
1Canonical
1Lxd
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
3.8 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Mark Laing discovered that LXD's PKI mode, until version 5.21.2, could be bypassed if the client's certificate was present in the trust store.
1Canonical
1Authd
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 10, 2024
N/A· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Authd, through version 0.3.6, did not sufficiently randomize user IDs to prevent collisions. A local attacker who can register user names could spoof another user's ID and gain their privileges.
1Canonical
1Authd
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 3, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Authd PAM module before version 0.3.5 can allow broker-managed users to impersonate any other user managed by the same broker and perform any PAM operation with it, including authenticating as them.
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerable juju introspection abstract UNIX domain socket. An abstract UNIX domain socket responsible for introspection is available without authentication locally to network namespace users. This enables denial of servi...Show more
Vulnerable juju introspection abstract UNIX domain socket. An abstract UNIX domain socket responsible for introspection is available without authentication locally to network namespace users. This enables denial of service attacks.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerable juju hook tool abstract UNIX domain socket. When combined with an attack of JUJU_CONTEXT_ID, any user on the local system with access to the default network namespace may connect to the @/var/lib/juju/agents/u...Show more
Vulnerable juju hook tool abstract UNIX domain socket. When combined with an attack of JUJU_CONTEXT_ID, any user on the local system with access to the default network namespace may connect to the @/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-xxxx-yyyy/agent.socket and perform actions that are normally reserved to a juju charm.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2024
N/A· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
JUJU_CONTEXT_ID is a predictable authentication secret. On a Juju machine (non-Kubernetes) or Juju charm container (on Kubernetes), an unprivileged user in the same network namespace can connect to an abstract domain soc...Show more
JUJU_CONTEXT_ID is a predictable authentication secret. On a Juju machine (non-Kubernetes) or Juju charm container (on Kubernetes), an unprivileged user in the same network namespace can connect to an abstract domain socket and guess the JUJU_CONTEXT_ID value. This gives the unprivileged user access to the same information and tools as the Juju charm.Show less
1Canonical
1Anbox Cloud
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 18, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Anbox Management Service, in versions 1.17.0 through 1.23.0, does not validate the TLS certificate provided to it by the Anbox Stream Agent. An attacker must be able to machine-in-the-middle the Anbox Stream Agent from w...Show more
Anbox Management Service, in versions 1.17.0 through 1.23.0, does not validate the TLS certificate provided to it by the Anbox Stream Agent. An attacker must be able to machine-in-the-middle the Anbox Stream Agent from within an internal network before they can attempt to take advantage of this.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 29, 2024
N/A· v4
3.8 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Juju that resulted in the leak of the sensitive context ID, which allows a local unprivileged attacker to access other sensitive data or relation accessible to the local charm.
1Canonical
1Snapd
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 25, 2024
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the destination of symbolic links when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain symbolic links and other file...Show more
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the destination of symbolic links when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain symbolic links and other file types. Various file entries within the snap squashfs image (such as icons and desktop files etc) are directly read by snapd when it is extracted. An attacker who could convince a user to install a malicious snap which contained symbolic links at these paths could then cause snapd to write out the contents of the symbolic link destination into a world-readable directory. This in-turn could allow an unprivileged user to gain access to privileged information.Show less
1Canonical
1Snapd
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 25, 2024
N/A· v4
6.6 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the file type when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain files that are non-regular files (such as pipes or...Show more
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, snapd failed to properly check the file type when extracting a snap. The snap format is a squashfs file-system image and so can contain files that are non-regular files (such as pipes or sockets etc). Various file entries within the snap squashfs image (such as icons etc) are directly read by snapd when it is extracted. An attacker who could convince a user to install a malicious snap which contained non-regular files at these paths could then cause snapd to block indefinitely trying to read from such files and cause a denial of service.Show less
1Canonical
1Snapd
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 25, 2024
N/A· v4
8.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, when using AppArmor for enforcement of sandbox permissions, snapd failed to restrict writes to the $HOME/bin path. In Ubuntu, when this path exists, it is automatically added to the user...Show more
In snapd versions prior to 2.62, when using AppArmor for enforcement of sandbox permissions, snapd failed to restrict writes to the $HOME/bin path. In Ubuntu, when this path exists, it is automatically added to the users PATH. An attacker who could convince a user to install a malicious snap which used the 'home' plug could use this vulnerability to install arbitrary scripts into the users PATH which may then be run by the user outside of the expected snap sandbox and hence allow them to escape confinement.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Desktop Provision
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 23, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in provd before version 0.1.5 with a setuid binary, which allows a local attacker to escalate their privilege.