← Back

Canonical

canonical

4,252 CVEs • 60 products

Products (60)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Lxd
lxd
Juju
juju
Apport
apport
Snapd
snapd
Cloud Init
cloud-init
Multipass
multipass
Ubuntu Core
ubuntu_core
Ubuntu Touch
ubuntu_touch
Maas
maas
Subiquity
subiquity
Landscape
landscape
Authd
authd
Acpi Support
acpi-support
Ubuntu
ubuntu
Lxcfs
lxcfs
Spread
spread
Php5
php5
Telepathy Idle
telepathy-idle
Libpam Modules
libpam-modules
Reportbug
reportbug
Ubuntu Image
ubuntu-image
Bazaar
bazaar
Selinux
selinux
Apparmor
apparmor
Ubuntu Cobbler
ubuntu_cobbler
Microk8s
microk8s
C Kernel
c-kernel
Whoopsie
whoopsie
Checkinstall
checkinstall
Ppp
ppp
Snapcraft
snapcraft
Pebble
pebble
Netplan
netplan
Anbox Cloud
anbox_cloud
Juju/utils
juju/utils
Pdfunite
pdfunite

CVEs (4,252)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which can potentially incorrectly compute the size of an internal buffer, leading to a heap memory out-of-bounds read in notification handling code. The bug c...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which can potentially incorrectly compute the size of an internal buffer, leading to a heap memory out-of-bounds read in notification handling code. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user and can result in invalid data being processed by the AppArmor DFA policy engine.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which incorrectly validate the size of an internal structure, leading to an out-of-bounds read in notification handling code. The bug can be triggered by an u...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which incorrectly validate the size of an internal structure, leading to an out-of-bounds read in notification handling code. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user and can result in information disclosure from adjacent slab objects.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8 contains AppArmor SAUCE patches which fail to acquire a lock when modifying a linked list. An unprivileged local user could trigger the race condition that can lead to a use-after-free (UAF) and, theoret...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8 contains AppArmor SAUCE patches which fail to acquire a lock when modifying a linked list. An unprivileged local user could trigger the race condition that can lead to a use-after-free (UAF) and, theoretically, arbitrary code execution.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 7.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which can, under certain circumstances, use an uninitialized variable in notification handling code. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user an...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 7.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which can, under certain circumstances, use an uninitialized variable in notification handling code. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user and can result in the incorrect caching of AppArmor notification responses.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches which fail to validate invalid sizes of the name field in AppAmor notification responses. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user and could result in ha...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches which fail to validate invalid sizes of the name field in AppAmor notification responses. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user and could result in handling of crafted responses.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which incorrectly attempt to free a pointer which was not previously kmalloc()d, while at the same time leaking allocated memory. The bug can be triggered by...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain AppArmor SAUCE patches which incorrectly attempt to free a pointer which was not previously kmalloc()d, while at the same time leaking allocated memory. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user and can result in the corruption of slab metadata and could lead to resource exhaustion.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches with a possible NULL pointer dereference in the handling of AppArmor notifications. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user. This can lead to a kernel o...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches with a possible NULL pointer dereference in the handling of AppArmor notifications. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user. This can lead to a kernel oops.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Linux
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches with a memory leak in the handling of big responses to AppArmor notifications. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user. The memory leak could lead to re...Show more
Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches with a memory leak in the handling of big responses to AppArmor notifications. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user. The memory leak could lead to resource exhaustion.Show less
1Canonical
1Multipass
Oct 14, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
8.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Canonical Multipass before version 1.16.3. The host-side SFTP server component (sshfs_server), which executes with root privileges on the host, contains a path containment bypass vulnerability...Show more
An issue was discovered in Canonical Multipass before version 1.16.3. The host-side SFTP server component (sshfs_server), which executes with root privileges on the host, contains a path containment bypass vulnerability within its validate_path function in src/sshfs_mount/sftp_server.cpp. The function performs a plain string prefix comparison on requested paths without path separator validation or dot-dot (..) normalization. A local attacker with root privileges inside a guest virtual machine can bypass the FUSE layer by injecting raw SFTP frames (such as an SSH_FXP_OPEN request) directly into the sshfs_server process stdin/stdout pipes via procfs. By supplying a path containing directory traversal sequences that match the allowed mount prefix, the attacker can force the host-side root process to resolve the traversal and open files outside the designated mount boundary. This allows a guest-side user to read arbitrary files on the host filesystem, resulting in a virtual machine escape.Show less
1Canonical
1Multipass
Oct 14, 2026
May 28, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Canonical Multipass for macOS before version 1.16.3 due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-5199. While the patch in version 1.16.0 updated the ownership of the multipassd daemon binary to root:w...Show more
An issue was discovered in Canonical Multipass for macOS before version 1.16.3 due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-5199. While the patch in version 1.16.0 updated the ownership of the multipassd daemon binary to root:wheel, five co-located binaries (multipass, qemu-img, qemu-system-aarch64, qemu-system-x86_64, and sshfs_server) in /Library/Application Support/com.canonical.multipass/bin/ retain ownership by the installing user and remain writable. Because the root LaunchDaemon (com.canonical.multipassd.plist) configures a PATH environment variable that prioritizes this user-writable directory and invokes these auxiliary binaries by their bare names, a local attacker can replace an auxiliary binary (such as qemu-img) with a malicious wrapper. When the root daemon subsequently triggers the binary during routine execution (e.g., via multipass launch), the malicious code executes with root privileges, leading to local privilege escalation.Show less
1Canonical
1Pdfunite
May 5, 2026
Apr 29, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
PDFunite 0.41.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by processing malformed PDF files during merge operations. Attackers can trigger a segmentation fault in the X...Show more
PDFunite 0.41.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by processing malformed PDF files during merge operations. Attackers can trigger a segmentation fault in the XRef::getEntry function within libpoppler by providing a specially crafted PDF file to the pdfunite utility.Show less
12Amazon
AristaCanonical+9 more
51Amazon Linux
Basesystem ModuleCaas Platform+48 more
Sep 8, 2026
Apr 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is...Show more
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.Show less
1Canonical
1Livepatch Client
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 20, 2026
5.7 MEDIUM· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An improper access control vulnerability in the canonical-livepatch snap client prior to version 10.15.0 allows a local unprivileged user to obtain a sensitive, root-level authentication token by sending an unauthenticat...Show more
An improper access control vulnerability in the canonical-livepatch snap client prior to version 10.15.0 allows a local unprivileged user to obtain a sensitive, root-level authentication token by sending an unauthenticated request to the livepatchd.sock Unix domain socket. This vulnerability is exploitable on systems where an administrator has already enabled the Livepatch client with a valid Ubuntu Pro subscription. This token allows an attacker to access Livepatch services using the victim's credentials, as well as potentially cause issues to the Livepatch server.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 10, 2026
6.0 MEDIUM· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Improper synchronization of the userTokens map in the API server in Canonical Juju 4.0.5, 3.6.20, and 2.9.56 may allow an authenticated user to possibly cause a denial of service on the server or possibly reuse a single-...Show more
Improper synchronization of the userTokens map in the API server in Canonical Juju 4.0.5, 3.6.20, and 2.9.56 may allow an authenticated user to possibly cause a denial of service on the server or possibly reuse a single-use discharge token.Show less
1Canonical
1Juju
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 10, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In Juju versions prior to 2.9.57 and 3.6.21, an authorization issue exists in the Controller facade. An authenticated user can call the CloudSpec API method to extract the cloud credentials used to bootstrap the controll...Show more
In Juju versions prior to 2.9.57 and 3.6.21, an authorization issue exists in the Controller facade. An authenticated user can call the CloudSpec API method to extract the cloud credentials used to bootstrap the controller. This allows a low-privileged user to access sensitive credentials. This issue is resolved in Juju versions 2.9.57 and 3.6.21.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Desktop Provision
Oct 7, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
2.7 LOW· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In Ubuntu, ubuntu-desktop-provision version 24.04.4 could leak sensitive user credentials during crash reporting. Upon installation failure, if a user submitted a bug report to Launchpad, ubuntu-desktop-provision could i...Show more
In Ubuntu, ubuntu-desktop-provision version 24.04.4 could leak sensitive user credentials during crash reporting. Upon installation failure, if a user submitted a bug report to Launchpad, ubuntu-desktop-provision could include the user's password hash in the attached logs.Show less
1Canonical
1Ubuntu Subiquity
Oct 7, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
2.7 LOW· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Ubuntu, Subiquity version 24.04.4 could leak sensitive user credentials during crash reporting. Upon installation failure, if a user submitted a bug report to Launchpad, Subiquity could include certain user credential...Show more
In Ubuntu, Subiquity version 24.04.4 could leak sensitive user credentials during crash reporting. Upon installation failure, if a user submitted a bug report to Launchpad, Subiquity could include certain user credentials, such as the user's plaintext Wi-Fi password, in the attached logs.Show less
1Canonical
1Lxd
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7, the doCertificateUpdate function in lxd/certificates.go does not validate the Type field when handling PUT/PATCH requests to /1.0/certificates/{fingerprint} for restricted TLS...Show more
In Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7, the doCertificateUpdate function in lxd/certificates.go does not validate the Type field when handling PUT/PATCH requests to /1.0/certificates/{fingerprint} for restricted TLS certificate users, allowing a remote authenticated attacker to escalate privileges to cluster admin.Show less
1Canonical
1Lxd
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In Canonical LXD before 6.8, the backup import path validates project restrictions against backup/index.yaml in the supplied tar archive but creates the instance from backup/container/backup.yaml, a separate file in the...Show more
In Canonical LXD before 6.8, the backup import path validates project restrictions against backup/index.yaml in the supplied tar archive but creates the instance from backup/container/backup.yaml, a separate file in the same archive that is never checked against project restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker with instance-creation permission in a restricted project can craft a backup archive where backup.yaml carries restricted settings such as security.privileged=true or raw.lxc directives, bypassing all project restriction enforcement and allowing full host compromise.Show less
1Canonical
1Lxd
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the...Show more
Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.Show less