Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in Apache Commons VFS before 2.10.0.
The FileObject API in Commons VFS has a 'resolveFile' method that
takes a 'scope' parameter. Specifying 'NameScope.DESCENDENT' promises that "an...Show moreRelative Path Traversal vulnerability in Apache Commons VFS before 2.10.0.
The FileObject API in Commons VFS has a 'resolveFile' method that
takes a 'scope' parameter. Specifying 'NameScope.DESCENDENT' promises that "an exception is thrown if the resolved file is not a descendent of
the base file". However, when the path contains encoded ".."
characters (for example, "%2E%2E/bar.txt"), it might return file objects that are not
a descendent of the base file, without throwing an exception.
This issue affects Apache Commons VFS: before 2.10.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.10.0, which fixes the issue.Show less |
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Apache Oozie.
This issue affects Apache Oozie: all versions.
As this project is reti...Show more** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Apache Oozie.
This issue affects Apache Oozie: all versions.
As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users.
NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.Show less |
Severity: medium (5.8) / important
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerabil...Show moreSeverity: medium (5.8) / important
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Apache Druid.
This issue affects all previous Druid versions.
When using the Druid management proxy, a request that has a specially crafted URL could be used to redirect the request to an arbitrary server instead. This has the potential for XSS or XSRF. The user is required to be authenticated for this exploit. The management proxy is enabled in Druid's out-of-box configuration. It may be disabled to mitigate this vulnerability. If the management proxy is disabled, some web console features will not work properly, but core functionality is unaffected.
Users are recommended to upgrade to Druid 31.0.2 or Druid 32.0.1, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in Apache Seata (incubating).
This issue affects Apache Seata (incubating): through <=2.2.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2....Show moreImproper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in Apache Seata (incubating).
This issue affects Apache Seata (incubating): through <=2.2.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.3.0, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Seata (incubating).
This issue affects Apache Seata (incubating): from 2.0.0 before 2.2.0.
Severity Justification:
The Apache Seata security team asses...Show moreDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Seata (incubating).
This issue affects Apache Seata (incubating): from 2.0.0 before 2.2.0.
Severity Justification:
The Apache Seata security team assesses the severity of this vulnerability as "Low" due to stringent real-world mitigating factors. First, the vulnerability is strictly isolated to the Raft cluster mode, an optional and non-default feature introduced in v2.0.0, while most users rely on the unaffected traditional architecture. Second, Seata is an internal middleware; communication between TC and RM/TM occurs entirely within trusted internal networks. An attacker would require prior, unauthorized access to the Intranet to exploit this, making external exploitation highly improbable.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.2.0, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache Airflow MySQL Provider.
When user triggered a DAG with dump_sql or load_sql functions they could pass a table...Show moreImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache Airflow MySQL Provider.
When user triggered a DAG with dump_sql or load_sql functions they could pass a table parameter from a UI, that could cause SQL injection by running SQL that was not intended.
It could lead to data corruption, modification and others.
This issue affects Apache Airflow MySQL Provider: before 6.2.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.0, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Apache NiFi 1.13.0 through 2.2.0 includes the username and password used to authenticate with MongoDB in the NiFi provenance events that MongoDB components generate during processing. An authorized user with read access...Show moreApache NiFi 1.13.0 through 2.2.0 includes the username and password used to authenticate with MongoDB in the NiFi provenance events that MongoDB components generate during processing. An authorized user with read access to the provenance events of those processors may see the credentials information. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.3.0 is the recommended mitigation, which removes the credentials from provenance event records.Show less |
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Apache Felix HTTP Webconsole Plugin.
This issue affects Apache Felix HTTP Webconsole Plugin: from Version 1.X through...Show moreImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Apache Felix HTTP Webconsole Plugin.
This issue affects Apache Felix HTTP Webconsole Plugin: from Version 1.X through 1.2.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.2.2, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.10.2, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.5, from 3.10.0 before 3.22.4.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.2 for 4.1...Show moreBypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.10.2, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.5, from 3.10.0 before 3.22.4.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.2 for 4.10.x LTS, 4.8.5 for 4.8.x LTS and 3.22.4 for 3.x releases.
This vulnerability is present in Camel's default incoming header filter, that allows an attacker to include Camel specific headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviours such as the camel-bean component, or the camel-exec component.
If you have Camel applications that are directly connected to the internet via HTTP, then an attacker could include parameters in the HTTP requests that are sent to the Camel application that get translated into headers.
The headers could be both provided as request parameters for an HTTP methods invocation or as part of the payload of the HTTP methods invocation.
All the known Camel HTTP component such as camel-servlet, camel-jetty, camel-undertow, camel-platform-http, and camel-netty-http would be vulnerable out of the box.
This CVE is related to the CVE-2025-27636: while they have the same root cause and are fixed with the same fix, CVE-2025-27636 was assumed to only be exploitable if an attacker could add malicious HTTP headers, while we have now determined that it is also exploitable via HTTP parameters. Like in CVE-2025-27636, exploitation is only possible if the Camel route uses particular vulnerable components.Show less |
Path Equivalence: 'file.Name' (Internal Dot) leading to Remote Code Execution and/or Information disclosure and/or malicious content added to uploaded files via write enabled Default Servlet in Apache Tomcat.
This issue...Show morePath Equivalence: 'file.Name' (Internal Dot) leading to Remote Code Execution and/or Information disclosure and/or malicious content added to uploaded files via write enabled Default Servlet in Apache Tomcat.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.2, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.34, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.98.
The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are
known to be affected: 8.5.0 though 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions
may also be affected.
If all of the following were true, a malicious user was able to view security sensitive files and/or inject content into those files:
- writes enabled for the default servlet (disabled by default)
- support for partial PUT (enabled by default)
- a target URL for security sensitive uploads that was a sub-directory of a target URL for public uploads
- attacker knowledge of the names of security sensitive files being uploaded
- the security sensitive files also being uploaded via partial PUT
If all of the following were true, a malicious user was able to perform remote code execution:
- writes enabled for the default servlet (disabled by default)
- support for partial PUT (enabled by default)
- application was using Tomcat's file based session persistence with the default storage location
- application included a library that may be leveraged in a deserialization attack
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.3, 10.1.35 or 9.0.99, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability in Apache OFBiz.
This issue affects Apache OFBiz: from 18.12.17 before 18.12.18.
It's a regression between 18.12.17 and 18.12.18.
In...Show moreImproper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability in Apache OFBiz.
This issue affects Apache OFBiz: from 18.12.17 before 18.12.18.
It's a regression between 18.12.17 and 18.12.18.
In case you use something like that, which is not recommended!
For security, only official releases should be used.
In other words, if you use 18.12.17 you are still safe.
The version 18.12.17 is not a affected.
But something between 18.12.17 and 18.12.18 is.
In that case, users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.18, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel components under particular conditions.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 through <= 4.10.1, from 4.8.0 through <= 4.8.4, from 3.10.0 through <= 3.22.3.
Users a...Show moreBypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel components under particular conditions.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 through <= 4.10.1, from 4.8.0 through <= 4.8.4, from 3.10.0 through <= 3.22.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.2 for 4.10.x LTS, 4.8.5 for 4.8.x LTS and 3.22.4 for 3.x releases.
This vulnerability is present in Camel's default incoming header filter, that allows an attacker to include Camel specific
headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviours such as the camel-bean component, to call another method
on the bean, than was coded in the application. In the camel-jms component, then a malicious header can be used to send
the message to another queue (on the same broker) than was coded in the application. This could also be seen by using the camel-exec component
The attacker would need to inject custom headers, such as HTTP protocols. So if you have Camel applications that are
directly connected to the internet via HTTP, then an attacker could include malicious HTTP headers in the HTTP requests
that are send to the Camel application.
All the known Camel HTTP component such as camel-servlet, camel-jetty, camel-undertow, camel-platform-http, and camel-netty-http would be vulnerable out of the box.
In these conditions an attacker could be able to forge a Camel header name and make the bean component invoking other methods in the same bean.
In terms of usage of the default header filter strategy the list of components using that is:
* camel-activemq
* camel-activemq6
* camel-amqp
* camel-aws2-sqs
* camel-azure-servicebus
* camel-cxf-rest
* camel-cxf-soap
* camel-http
* camel-jetty
* camel-jms
* camel-kafka
* camel-knative
* camel-mail
* camel-nats
* camel-netty-http
* camel-platform-http
* camel-rest
* camel-sjms
* camel-spring-rabbitmq
* camel-stomp
* camel-tahu
* camel-undertow
* camel-xmpp
The vulnerability arises due to a bug in the default filtering mechanism that only blocks headers starting with "Camel", "camel", or "org.apache.camel.".
Mitigation: You can easily work around this in your Camel applications by removing the headers in your Camel routes. There are many ways of doing this, also globally or per route. This means you could use the removeHeaders EIP, to filter out anything like "cAmel, cAMEL" etc, or in general everything not starting with "Camel", "camel" or "org.apache.camel.".Show less |
Improper Access Control vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 10.0.0 through 10.0.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.0.4, which fixes the issue. |
Improper Access Control vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 9.2.0 through 9.2.8, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.9 or 10.0....Show moreImproper Access Control vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 9.2.0 through 9.2.8, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.9 or 10.0.4, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 8.1.11, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.8, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.3.
Users are recommended to upgr...Show moreImproper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 8.1.11, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.8, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.9 or 10.0.4, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Expected Behavior Violation vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 9.0.0 through 9.2.8, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 9.2.9 or...Show moreExpected Behavior Violation vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 9.0.0 through 9.2.8, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 9.2.9 or 10.0.4 or newer, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Improper Neutralization of Formula Elements in Export CSV feature of Apache Ranger in Apache Ranger Version < 2.6.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.6.0, which fixes this issue. |
Improper privilege management in a REST interface allowed registered users to access unauthorized resources if the resource ID was know.
This issue affects Apache StreamPipes: through 0.95.1.
Users are recommended...Show moreImproper privilege management in a REST interface allowed registered users to access unauthorized resources if the resource ID was know.
This issue affects Apache StreamPipes: through 0.95.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.97.0 which fixes the issue.Show less |
CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data at the eventmesh-meta-raft plugin module in Apache EventMesh master branch without release version on windows\linux\mac os e.g. platforms allows attackers to send controlled mess...Show moreCWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data at the eventmesh-meta-raft plugin module in Apache EventMesh master branch without release version on windows\linux\mac os e.g. platforms allows attackers to send controlled message and remote code execute via hessian deserialization rpc protocol. Users can use the code under the master branch in project repo or version 1.11.0 to fix this issue.Show less |
In Apache Ignite versions from 2.6.0 and before 2.17.0, configured Class Serialization Filters are ignored for some Ignite endpoints. The vulnerability could be exploited if an attacker manually crafts an Ignite message...Show moreIn Apache Ignite versions from 2.6.0 and before 2.17.0, configured Class Serialization Filters are ignored for some Ignite endpoints. The vulnerability could be exploited if an attacker manually crafts an Ignite message containing a vulnerable object whose class is present in the Ignite server classpath and sends it to Ignite server endpoints. Deserialization of such a message by the Ignite server may result in the execution of arbitrary code on the Apache Ignite server side.Show less |