Apache Airflow's serialization layer reconstructed exception nodes by calling `import_string()` on a class name taken from the serialized blob and instantiating it with arguments from the same blob, with no restriction o...Show moreApache Airflow's serialization layer reconstructed exception nodes by calling `import_string()` on a class name taken from the serialized blob and instantiating it with arguments from the same blob, with no restriction on what could be imported. An operator's `executor_config` reaches that branch, so a Dag author could place a value there that causes an arbitrary callable to be imported and invoked -- for example `subprocess.check_output`, or `builtins.eval` on the `builtins`-prefixed variant. The code runs in the **Scheduler**, which reconstructs serialized Dags in its normal loop with no request involved, and in the **API server**, on any authenticated read of the Dag such as `GET /api/v2/dags/{dag_id}/details`. Both are components the Airflow security model states must never execute Dag-author code, and both hold the metadata database credentials and the JWT signing secret. No non-default configuration is required. This is a **different sink from CVE-2026-33264**, which covered only the trigger branch of the same deserializer: deployments that upgraded in response to that advisory are still affected through the exception branch and must upgrade again. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which restricts the imported class to a subclass of `BaseException`.Show less |
Apache Airflow's secrets masker hides values stored under sensitive key names when they are displayed in the UI. The masker's recursion-depth limit did not descend into values nested inside a list, tuple, or set beyond t...Show moreApache Airflow's secrets masker hides values stored under sensitive key names when they are displayed in the UI. The masker's recursion-depth limit did not descend into values nested inside a list, tuple, or set beyond that limit, so an Airflow Variable holding such a deeply-nested value was shown unmasked in the Variables UI. The exposure is limited to the UI: any authenticated user who can see the Variable in the UI can already read its full value through the Variables REST API, so this does not disclose data the user could not otherwise obtain — the masking is a shoulder-surfing defense for the UI, not an access-control boundary.
This is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2026-42358, whose fix made only the dictionary walk unbounded; lists, tuples, and sets beyond the depth limit remained unmasked in the UI. Deployments that applied the CVE-2026-42358 fix should also upgrade to address this residual case. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.Show less |
The Google Cloud Secret Manager secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Google provider never applied the team scope when resolving Connections and Variables: the caller's `team_name` was accepted by the backend but dropped...Show moreThe Google Cloud Secret Manager secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Google provider never applied the team scope when resolving Connections and Variables: the caller's `team_name` was accepted by the backend but dropped at the internal call boundary, so every lookup resolved against the team-agnostic secret name. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a task or Dag belonging to one team resolved another team's Connection or Variable, obtaining its credentials in full. No unusual configuration is required beyond enabling multi-team mode and using this backend. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-google 22.3.0 or later, which builds and applies the team-scoped secret name.Show less |
Improper TLS hostname verification vulnerability in Apache HttpComponents Client 5.4 or newer. HostnameVerificationPolicy#BUILTIN setting has no effect when used with the async version of HttpClient. An attacker that can...Show moreImproper TLS hostname verification vulnerability in Apache HttpComponents Client 5.4 or newer. HostnameVerificationPolicy#BUILTIN setting has no effect when used with the async version of HttpClient. An attacker that can intercept and modify traffic between the client and the server can impersonate the server by presenting a valid certificate for a different domain.
Please note the classic version of HttpClient is not affected by this vulnerability.
Affected users are recommended to upgrade to at least version 5.6.4, which fixes the issue.Show less |
Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue. |
The AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store and Secrets Manager backends in Apache Airflow's Amazon provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup misse...Show moreThe AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store and Secrets Manager backends in Apache Airflow's Amazon provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with either backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's namespace, obtaining its credentials in full. No unusual configuration is required beyond enabling multi-team mode and using one of these backends. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-amazon 9.34.0 or later, which refuses the team-agnostic fall-through for an id that could name a team namespace.Show less |
The Yandex Lockbox secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Yandex provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-t...Show moreThe Yandex Lockbox secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Yandex provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's namespace, obtaining its credentials in full. No unusual configuration is required beyond enabling multi-team mode and using this backend. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-yandex 4.5.1 or later, which refuses the team-agnostic fall-through for an id that could name a team namespace.Show less |
UnixAuth lacks brute-force protection in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0.
Note: UnixAuth is NOT a recommended option for production deployments.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issu...Show moreUnixAuth lacks brute-force protection in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0.
Note: UnixAuth is NOT a recommended option for production deployments.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue.Show less |
Logs contain replayable JWT tokens in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue. |
TLS hostname verification issue in Apache Ranger Client Code in versions <= 2.8.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue. |
Vulnerability in tapestry-core in Apache Tapestry 5.5.0+ on all platforms allows attackers to download clsspath assets via specially crafted URLs.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.9.1, which fixes this issue...Show moreVulnerability in tapestry-core in Apache Tapestry 5.5.0+ on all platforms allows attackers to download clsspath assets via specially crafted URLs.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.9.1, which fixes this issue.Show less |
Missing Authentication in Apache Ranger Download APIs on versions <= 2.8.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue. |
Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in GraalScriptEngineCreator in Apache Ranger <= 2.8.0
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue. |
Remote Code Execution via Arbitrary Class Instantiation in plugin-schema-registry component in Apache Ranger <= 2.8.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue. |
Remote Code Execution via JDBC URL Injection in Apache Ranger <= 2.8.0
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue. |
Privilege Escalation via URL Parameter is reported in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue. |
SQL Injection vulnerability vulnerability in Apache Ranger.
This issue affects .
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes the issue. |
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Apache Ranger.
This issue affects Apache Ranger: from 0.6 through 2.8. |
Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in Apache Fory C++ deserialization.
This issue affects Apache Fory C++ versions from 0.14.0 before 1.5.0 when deserializing structs containing tagged integer fields. A crafted input payl...Show moreOut-of-bounds Read vulnerability in Apache Fory C++ deserialization.
This issue affects Apache Fory C++ versions from 0.14.0 before 1.5.0 when deserializing structs containing tagged integer fields. A crafted input payload may trigger an out-of-bounds heap read in the tagged integer fast-path deserializer, potentially causing information disclosure or denial of service.
Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Fory 1.5.0, which fixes this issue. Applications that do not use Apache Fory C++ or do not use tagged integer fields are not affected.Show less |
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in the Go implementation of Apache Fory allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by supplying crafted data containing malformed type metadata, which triggers an unca...Show moreDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in the Go implementation of Apache Fory allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by supplying crafted data containing malformed type metadata, which triggers an uncaught panic.
This issue affects Apache Fory: from 0.16.0 before 1.5.0. Users of other language implementations are not affected.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.5.0, which fixes the issue.Show less |