← Back

Apache

apache

3,498 CVEs • 398 products

Products (398)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Http Server
http_server
Tomcat
tomcat
Airflow
airflow
Struts
struts
Camel
camel
Cxf
cxf
Ofbiz
ofbiz
Activemq
activemq
Superset
superset
Cloudstack
cloudstack
Openoffice
openoffice
Nifi
nifi
Subversion
subversion
Solr
solr
Inlong
inlong
Hadoop
hadoop
Wicket
wicket
Thrift
thrift
Ranger
ranger
Openmeetings
openmeetings
Jspwiki
jspwiki
Apisix
apisix
Tika
tika
Ambari
ambari
Zeppelin
zeppelin
Shiro
shiro
Syncope
syncope
Kylin
kylin
Answer
answer
Hive
hive
Geode
geode
Spark
spark
Fineract
fineract
Artemis
artemis
Qpid Broker J
qpid_broker-j
Couchdb
couchdb
Archiva
archiva
Log4j
log4j
Iotdb
iotdb
Pulsar
pulsar
Dubbo
dubbo
Cordova
cordova
Karaf
karaf
Linkis
linkis
Kafka
kafka
Streampark
streampark
Qpid
qpid
Cassandra
cassandra
Zookeeper
zookeeper
Hertzbeat
hertzbeat
Atlas
atlas
Nimble
nimble
James
james
Roller
roller
Storm
storm
Jmeter
jmeter
Spamassassin
spamassassin
Guacamole
guacamole
Wss4j
wss4j
Impala
impala
Allura
allura
Druid
druid
Xerces C++
xerces-c++
Apr Util
apr-util
Tapestry
tapestry
Ozone
ozone
Fory
fory
Neethi
neethi
Batik
batik
Geronimo
geronimo
Httpclient
httpclient
Poi
poi
Pdfbox
pdfbox
Tomee
tomee
Log4net
log4net
Ignite
ignite
Mesos
mesos
Nuttx
nuttx
Shenyu
shenyu
Derby
derby
Jackrabbit
jackrabbit
Opennlp
opennlp
Tomcat Native
tomcat_native
Mina
mina
Axis
axis
Bookkeeper
bookkeeper
Qpid Proton J
qpid_proton-j
Mina Sshd
mina_sshd
Avro
avro
Doris
doris
Streampipes
streampipes
Mod Python
mod_python

CVEs (3,498)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Apache
1Struts
Aug 18, 2026
Aug 15, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Struts. When no fixed locale is configured, the locale used for localized-text lookups is taken from the incoming request, allowing an unauthen...Show more
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Struts. When no fixed locale is configured, the locale used for localized-text lookups is taken from the incoming request, allowing an unauthenticated remote client to cause the framework's internal localized-text caches to grow without bound and exhaust the Java heap, denying service to other users. Applications that configure a fixed locale are not affected. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 through 2.3.37, from 2.5.0 through 2.5.33, from 6.0.0 through 6.10.0, from 7.0.0 through 7.2.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.11.0 or 7.3.0, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Struts
Aug 18, 2026
Aug 15, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Apache Struts. An application that exposes an endpoint collecting Content Security Policy violation reports reads the submitted report into memory without bounding how m...Show more
Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Apache Struts. An application that exposes an endpoint collecting Content Security Policy violation reports reads the submitted report into memory without bounding how much it will accept, so a single request can exhaust the heap and deny service to other users. Such endpoints are ordinarily reachable without authentication. The core distribution maps no such endpoint by default; applications that do not collect violation reports are not affected. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 6.0.0 through 6.10.0, from 7.0.0 through 7.2.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.11.0 or 7.3.0, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Struts
Aug 18, 2026
Aug 15, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Exposure of data element to wrong session vulnerability in the JSON plugin of Apache Struts. Per-response serialization state could be shared across concurrent requests, allowing response content associated with one requ...Show more
Exposure of data element to wrong session vulnerability in the JSON plugin of Apache Struts. Per-response serialization state could be shared across concurrent requests, allowing response content associated with one request to become observable in another. Only the SMD / JSON-RPC handling of the JSON interceptor is affected, which is not enabled by default; applications using the json result type are not affected. This issue affects Apache Struts: 7.2.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 7.3.0, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Struts
Aug 18, 2026
Aug 15, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Exposure of data element to wrong session vulnerability in the JSON plugin of Apache Struts. Per-request parsing state could be shared across concurrent requests, allowing data associated with one request to become obser...Show more
Exposure of data element to wrong session vulnerability in the JSON plugin of Apache Struts. Per-request parsing state could be shared across concurrent requests, allowing data associated with one request to become observable in another, and configured parsing limits not to be enforced as intended. Populating actions from a JSON request body is not enabled by default; applications that do not use the JSON plugin are not affected. This issue affects Apache Struts: 7.2.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 7.3.0, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Struts
Aug 18, 2026
Aug 14, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the JSON plugin of Apache Struts. When an application is configured to populate actions from a JSON request body, the plugin reads that body into memory without bounding...Show more
Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the JSON plugin of Apache Struts. When an application is configured to populate actions from a JSON request body, the plugin reads that body into memory without bounding how much it will accept, so a single request can exhaust the heap and deny service to other users. The plugin's configurable JSON input length limit does not bound this read. The JSON plugin is an optional component; applications that do not use it, or use it without enabling JSON request-body handling, are not affected. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.1.8 through 2.3.37, from 2.5.0 through 2.5.33, from 6.0.0 through 6.10.0, from 7.0.0 through 7.2.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.11.0 or 7.3.0, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Shindig
Sep 11, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Shindig. This issue affects Apache Shindig: all versions. Users with access to the Shindig REST API can send specially-crafted r...Show more
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Shindig. This issue affects Apache Shindig: all versions. Users with access to the Shindig REST API can send specially-crafted requests to trigger arbitrary code execution on the server. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.Show less
1Apache
1Allura
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Specifically crafted inputs may lead to git argument injection in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.
1Apache
1Allura
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) due to missing permission checks for multiple Artifact types in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1...Show more
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) due to missing permission checks for multiple Artifact types in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Allura
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
XSS vulnerability in code display in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.
1Apache
1Allura
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
XSS vulnerability in Markdown handling in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: from 1.10.0 before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (`POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize`) and the XCom result check on `wait_dag_run_until_finished` authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other aut...Show more
Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (`POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize`) and the XCom result check on `wait_dag_run_until_finished` authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other authorization site. A team-aware auth manager distinguishes a team-scoped Dag from a global one by that field -- the Keycloak auth manager, for example, checks the `DAG` resource instead of `DAG:<team>` -- so the team-scoped permission that should gate the request was never consulted. In a deployment running multi-team mode with a team-aware auth manager, an authenticated user in one team could trigger Dag runs belonging to another team, supplying their own `dag_run_id` and `conf`, and could read another team's XCom values. Deployments using the FAB auth manager are unaffected, as it has no multi-team support. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which resolves the Dag's team at both sites.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's Task SDK did not mask the contents of a Variable whose JSON value is a list, so secrets stored in that shape appeared in cleartext in task logs and in the Rendered Templates UI. Masking was applied only...Show more
Apache Airflow's Task SDK did not mask the contents of a Variable whose JSON value is a list, so secrets stored in that shape appeared in cleartext in task logs and in the Rendered Templates UI. Masking was applied only when the deserialized value was a string or a dict; a list at the top level matched neither and was returned unmasked. Any authenticated user able to read the logs or rendered templates of a task that references such a Variable could recover the values, with no special configuration required. This is the list-shaped counterpart of CVE-2026-59244, whose fix covered the dict case only, so deployments that upgraded in response to that advisory remain affected and must upgrade again. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow wrote Variable values and Connection `extra` contents to the audit log in cleartext when they were submitted through the bulk endpoints (`PATCH /api/v2/variables` and `PATCH /api/v2/connections`). The audi...Show more
Apache Airflow wrote Variable values and Connection `extra` contents to the audit log in cleartext when they were submitted through the bulk endpoints (`PATCH /api/v2/variables` and `PATCH /api/v2/connections`). The audit-log masking recognised only top-level request fields, and a bulk request nests its entities two levels below, so no masking was applied to them. Any authenticated user with audit-log read access -- who need not hold Variables or Connections read at all -- could recover those secrets verbatim, and the Connection `extra` copy is stored unencrypted in the log while the connection table encrypts it. The Airflow UI's *Import Variables* action posts to this endpoint, so an ordinary operator import wrote every secret in the file to the log. This is a different code path from CVE-2026-50204: that fix shipped in 3.3.0 and covers the single-entity endpoints only, so deployments that upgraded in response to that advisory remain affected and must upgrade again. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's Backfill API authorized a request against a Dag id supplied by the caller whenever the `backfill_id` path segment failed to parse. The authorization dependency parsed it with `int()` while the route hand...Show more
Apache Airflow's Backfill API authorized a request against a Dag id supplied by the caller whenever the `backfill_id` path segment failed to parse. The authorization dependency parsed it with `int()` while the route handler parsed it as pydantic's `NonNegativeInt`, which accepts values `int()` rejects (`1.0` coerces to `1`); FastAPI resolves dependencies before endpoint validation, so the two acted on different Dags. An authenticated user holding edit permission on any single Dag could therefore read, pause and cancel backfills belonging to any other Dag, including moving another Dag's queued runs to `failed`. No non-default configuration is required and backfill ids are sequential, so finding a target is trivial. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which parses the backfill id with the same type the routes declare.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's environment-variable secrets backend resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable from the wrong team's scope. The guard meant to prevent this only ran when no team scope was supplied, and its pattern c...Show more
Apache Airflow's environment-variable secrets backend resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable from the wrong team's scope. The guard meant to prevent this only ran when no team scope was supplied, and its pattern could not match a team name containing an underscore, which team names are allowed to contain. When the guard did not apply, the lookup fell through to an unconditional global read that resolved the stored `AIRFLOW_CONN__<TEAM>___<ID>` variable regardless of which team asked. In multi-team mode an authenticated user of one team could therefore have `POST /api/v2/connections/test` resolve another team's Connection and authenticate outward with that team's credentials; the endpoint uses the credentials rather than returning them. Exploitation requires `[core] multi_team` enabled, `[core] test_connection` set to `Enabled` (it ships `Disabled`), team-scoped secrets provisioned as environment variables in the API-server process, and knowledge of the encoded identifier. Redirecting the test at an attacker-controlled host is separately blocked. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's Task SDK rebuilt a `Callback` object from serialized data by re-running its constructor, which imports the module named by the stored callback path. Because `SyncCallback` is itself an Airflow class it p...Show more
Apache Airflow's Task SDK rebuilt a `Callback` object from serialized data by re-running its constructor, which imports the module named by the stored callback path. Because `SyncCallback` is itself an Airflow class it passes the default `allowed_deserialization_classes` allow-list, so tightening that setting does not help. A Dag author — who controls a task instance's `next_kwargs` through the task execution API — can therefore cause an arbitrary module to be imported inside the scheduler process, when the scheduler's `awaiting_input` timeout sweep deserializes that value. No non-default configuration is required; the sweep runs unconditionally. Versions before 3.3.0 are not affected: the class existed, but the scheduler sweep that reaches it did not. This is a separate code path from CVE-2026-58076 and CVE-2026-67260, which cover different gadgets reaching deserialization — applying either of those fixes does not address this one. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow 3.3.0 moved human-in-the-loop tasks from the triggerer to a new `awaiting_input` task state swept by the scheduler. That sweep deserializes the task instance's `next_kwargs` without an allow-list, so a Dag...Show more
Apache Airflow 3.3.0 moved human-in-the-loop tasks from the triggerer to a new `awaiting_input` task state swept by the scheduler. That sweep deserializes the task instance's `next_kwargs` without an allow-list, so a Dag author — who controls that value through the task execution API — can cause an arbitrary module import and object instantiation inside the scheduler process, or terminate the scheduler job. No non-default configuration is required: the sweep runs unconditionally every 15 seconds, and the default `allowed_deserialization_classes` setting does not cover this code path. Versions before 3.3.0 are not affected, because human-in-the-loop tasks deferred onto the triggerer instead. This is a different code path from CVE-2026-58076, which covers the same unguarded exception-node deserialization reached elsewhere — deployments that applied that fix must upgrade for this issue as well. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's Config API did not mask team-scoped sensitive configuration values in multi-team deployments. When an administrator has enabled multi-team mode and exposed the Config API, an authenticated Viewer holding...Show more
Apache Airflow's Config API did not mask team-scoped sensitive configuration values in multi-team deployments. When an administrator has enabled multi-team mode and exposed the Config API, an authenticated Viewer holding only configuration-read access — with no prior access to the secret — could read a team-scoped Celery broker URL, including its embedded credentials, in cleartext, while the equivalent global option was correctly masked. The secrets masker matched only base section and option names and did not normalize team-prefixed sections before the sensitivity check (CWE-200). This is a distinct masker bypass from CVE-2026-48828 and CVE-2026-48892: deployments that upgraded to apache-airflow 3.3.0 to address those issues remain affected by this team-scoped variant. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which normalizes team-scoped sections before masking.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's secrets masker did not mask `var.json` Variable values whose value is a dict in the Rendered Templates UI — the dict value failed an `isinstance(str)` guard — so a secret stored as a JSON Variable and re...Show more
Apache Airflow's secrets masker did not mask `var.json` Variable values whose value is a dict in the Rendered Templates UI — the dict value failed an `isinstance(str)` guard — so a secret stored as a JSON Variable and referenced in a template via `var.json` was displayed in cleartext to any user with access to that task's Rendered Templates view. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which masks nested Variable values regardless of type.Show less
1Apache
1Airflow
Oct 24, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Airflow's XCom `GET /api/v2/{...}/xcomEntries/{key}?deserialize=true` endpoint passed a string-literal payload through `BaseXCom.deserialize_value` without the `_check_forbidden_xcom_keys` guard, allowing an authe...Show more
Apache Airflow's XCom `GET /api/v2/{...}/xcomEntries/{key}?deserialize=true` endpoint passed a string-literal payload through `BaseXCom.deserialize_value` without the `_check_forbidden_xcom_keys` guard, allowing an authenticated API user with XCom write-and-read access to instantiate arbitrary `airflow.*` classes on the API server (CWE-502). An authenticated user who can write an XCom value and then read it back with `deserialize=true` triggers the unsafe instantiation. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which rejects reserved XCom serialization keys submitted as JSON string literals.Show less