← Back

Apache

apache

3,367 CVEs • 391 products

Products (391)

Click to collapse
Toggle
Http Server
http_server
Tomcat
tomcat
Airflow
airflow
Struts
struts
Camel
camel
Ofbiz
ofbiz
Activemq
activemq
Superset
superset
Cxf
cxf
Cloudstack
cloudstack
Openoffice
openoffice
Nifi
nifi
Subversion
subversion
Solr
solr
Inlong
inlong
Hadoop
hadoop
Wicket
wicket
Thrift
thrift
Ranger
ranger
Openmeetings
openmeetings
Jspwiki
jspwiki
Apisix
apisix
Tika
tika
Ambari
ambari
Zeppelin
zeppelin
Shiro
shiro
Syncope
syncope
Kylin
kylin
Answer
answer
Hive
hive
Geode
geode
Spark
spark
Fineract
fineract
Couchdb
couchdb
Archiva
archiva
Log4j
log4j
Iotdb
iotdb
Pulsar
pulsar
Dubbo
dubbo
Cordova
cordova
Linkis
linkis
Kafka
kafka
Streampark
streampark
Qpid
qpid
Cassandra
cassandra
Hertzbeat
hertzbeat
Qpid Broker J
qpid_broker-j
Atlas
atlas
Nimble
nimble
Artemis
artemis
James
james
Roller
roller
Storm
storm
Jmeter
jmeter
Spamassassin
spamassassin
Guacamole
guacamole
Karaf
karaf
Allura
allura
Druid
druid
Xerces C++
xerces-c++
Apr Util
apr-util
Tapestry
tapestry
Zookeeper
zookeeper
Ozone
ozone
Fory
fory
Batik
batik
Geronimo
geronimo
Httpclient
httpclient
Poi
poi
Pdfbox
pdfbox
Tomee
tomee
Ignite
ignite
Mesos
mesos
Nuttx
nuttx
Shenyu
shenyu
Derby
derby
Mina
mina
Axis
axis
Bookkeeper
bookkeeper
Impala
impala
Qpid Proton J
qpid_proton-j
Mina Sshd
mina_sshd
Avro
avro
Doris
doris
Streampipes
streampipes
Mod Python
mod_python
Jackrabbit
jackrabbit
Axis2
axis2
Hbase
hbase
Drill
drill

CVEs (3,367)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Apache
1Cxf
Aug 7, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A race condition in JCacheCodeDataProvider allows an attacker to redeem a single authorization code multiple times via concurrent requests, resulting in the issuance of multiple distinct, valid access tokens. Users are r...Show more
A race condition in JCacheCodeDataProvider allows an attacker to redeem a single authorization code multiple times via concurrent requests, resulting in the issuance of multiple distinct, valid access tokens. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3, 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue.Show less
1Apache
1Cxf
Aug 7, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Apache CXF's JMS transport deserializes the body of any inbound JMS ObjectMessage using native Java deserialization, with no type restrictions in place. Any attacker able to place a message on the service's JMS destinati...Show more
Apache CXF's JMS transport deserializes the body of any inbound JMS ObjectMessage using native Java deserialization, with no type restrictions in place. Any attacker able to place a message on the service's JMS destination can submit a malicious serialized object, leading to denial of service or, if a suitable gadget class is on the classpath, remote code execution. The fix disables ObjectMessage deserialization by default, with a configuration switch to re-enable it if needed. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue.Show less
1Apache
1Cxf
Aug 7, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Apache CXF reads a top-level WSDL through its hardened StaxUtils path, which disables XML DTDs and external entities. However, any <wsdl:import> or <xsd:import> referenced from that top-level WSDL is handed off to WSDL4J...Show more
Apache CXF reads a top-level WSDL through its hardened StaxUtils path, which disables XML DTDs and external entities. However, any <wsdl:import> or <xsd:import> referenced from that top-level WSDL is handed off to WSDL4J, which does not disable DOCTYPE declarations or external entities. As a result, the protections applied to the top-level document do not extend to imported documents, leaving imported WSDL/XSD content vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue.Show less
1Apache
1Cxf
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An incomplete fix for CVE-2026-50645 means that it is still possible to perform a denial of service attack on Apache CXF by sending a message with many attachment headers. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2...Show more
An incomplete fix for CVE-2026-50645 means that it is still possible to perform a denial of service attack on Apache CXF by sending a message with many attachment headers. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue.Show less
1Apache
1Cxf
Aug 7, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Apache CXF allows to set a limit on the number of form parameters in a JAX-RS message via the "maxFormParameterCount" configuration option. However, no default limit is set which may lead to denial of service attacks whe...Show more
Apache CXF allows to set a limit on the number of form parameters in a JAX-RS message via the "maxFormParameterCount" configuration option. However, no default limit is set which may lead to denial of service attacks when processing  requests with very large numbers of form parameters. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue by using a default limit of 500 parameters.Show less
1Apache
1Cxf
Aug 7, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The OpenID Connect Core 1.0 specification mandates that the RP MUST validate the `c_hash` parameter when operating in the Hybrid Flow. If an Apache CXF RP is integrated with a non-compliant or misconfigured Identity Prov...Show more
The OpenID Connect Core 1.0 specification mandates that the RP MUST validate the `c_hash` parameter when operating in the Hybrid Flow. If an Apache CXF RP is integrated with a non-compliant or misconfigured Identity Provider (IdP) that omits the `c_hash`, the RP becomes vulnerable to Authorization Code Substitution/Injection attacks. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue.Show less
1Apache
1Cxf
Aug 7, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Apache CXF allows to control the maximum attachment size via the "attachment-max-size". Prior to Apache CXF 4.2.3 and 4.1.8 and 3.6.12, there was no default placed on this size, meaning that a denial of service attack is...Show more
Apache CXF allows to control the maximum attachment size via the "attachment-max-size". Prior to Apache CXF 4.2.3 and 4.1.8 and 3.6.12, there was no default placed on this size, meaning that a denial of service attack is possible if the user doesn't explicitly set the limit. Users should update to Apache CXF 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12 which fixes this problem by imposing a default attachment size limit of 50mb.Show less
1Apache
1Polaris
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 6, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Polaris did not consistently validate storage locations supplied during table and view registration. An authenticated principal with permission to register a table or view could, depending on the affected release...Show more
Apache Polaris did not consistently validate storage locations supplied during table and view registration. An authenticated principal with permission to register a table or view could, depending on the affected release and registration path, cause Polaris to use the catalog's storage credentials to read a caller-selected Iceberg metadata file before verifying that the file was within the catalog's allowed storage locations. If the catalog's underlying credentials could read an object outside that boundary, this could disclose limited information from the object. Polaris could also accept registration metadata located within an allowed location that contained references to storage locations outside the allowed boundary. This second condition did not itself cause Polaris to read the referenced external locations during registration. The demonstrated impact is limited to confidentiality. No unauthorized data modification or availability impact has been demonstrated. The server-side read requires a deployment using S3 credential vending and an object outside the allowed locations that the catalog's underlying storage credentials can read. Exploitation requires an authenticated principal with table- or view-registration privileges.Show less
1Apache
1Answer
Aug 7, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Administrative API keys remained usable after the owning administrator was demoted or the account was mar...Show more
Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Administrative API keys remained usable after the owning administrator was demoted or the account was marked inactive, suspended, or deleted, allowing continued access until the keys were explicitly removed. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Answer
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Deleted or pending answers could be retrieved by unauthorized users through th...Show more
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Deleted or pending answers could be retrieved by unauthorized users through the single-answer read path when the parent question remained visible, exposing answer content that should not have been accessible. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Answer
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Any authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing auth...Show more
Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Any authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Answer
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. A missing ownership check in the avatar-cleanup logic allows any authenticated user to delete other users' upl...Show more
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. A missing ownership check in the avatar-cleanup logic allows any authenticated user to delete other users' uploaded files by supplying their file URLs. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Answer
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. A missing authorization check in the external-login email binding flow allows unauthentica...Show more
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. A missing authorization check in the external-login email binding flow allows unauthenticated attackers to take over arbitrary user accounts by tricking victims into clicking a crafted confirmation link. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Answer
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Unauthenticated attackers can cause a denial of service via a specially crafted Accep...Show more
Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Unauthenticated attackers can cause a denial of service via a specially crafted Accept-Language header that triggers excessive CPU consumption during parsing. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Lucy
Sep 4, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Apache Lucy. This issue affects Apache Lucy: all versions. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes thi...Show more
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Apache Lucy. This issue affects Apache Lucy: all versions. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. Lucy is now maintained outside of the ASF at https://github.com/lucysearch . This issue has been fixed in 0.8.0 there. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.Show less
1Apache
1Lucy
Sep 4, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: this attack requires control over the search index, which is considered fully trusted by Lucy.
1Apache
1Lucy
Sep 4, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Lucy. This issue affects Apache Lucy: all versions. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fix...Show more
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Lucy. This issue affects Apache Lucy: all versions. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. Lucy is now maintained outside of the ASF at https://github.com/lucysearch . 0.8.0 is no longer affected by this issue, because the offending feature has been removed there. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.Show less
1Apache
1Lucy
Sep 4, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Apache Lucy. This issue affects Apache Lucy: all versions. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this iss...Show more
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Apache Lucy. This issue affects Apache Lucy: all versions. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the ASF. Lucy is now maintained outside of the ASF at https://github.com/lucysearchShow less
1Apache
1Qpid Broker J
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
It was not possible to govern the rate at which the broker would respond to an echo flow, enabling an authenticated attacker to cause excessive resource usage and potential denial of service. This issue affects Apache Q...Show more
It was not possible to govern the rate at which the broker would respond to an echo flow, enabling an authenticated attacker to cause excessive resource usage and potential denial of service. This issue affects Apache Qpid Broker-J: through 10.0.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.1.0, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Qpid Broker J
Aug 6, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
It was not possible to govern the maximum number of transfer frames per incoming delivery, enabling an authenticated attacker to cause excessive resource usage and potential denial of service. This issue affects Apache...Show more
It was not possible to govern the maximum number of transfer frames per incoming delivery, enabling an authenticated attacker to cause excessive resource usage and potential denial of service. This issue affects Apache Qpid Broker-J: through 10.0.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.1.0, which fixes the issue.Show less