Zammad

An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. Due to lack of rate limiting in the "email address verification" feature, an attacker could send many requests for a known address to cause Denial Of Service (generation of many emails, which would also spam the victim).Show less

An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. In several subsystems, SSL/TLS was used to establish connections to external services without proper validation of hostname and certificate authority. This is exploitable by man-in-the-middle attackers.Show less

An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. It uses the public endpoint /api/v1/signshow for its login screen. This endpoint returns internal configuration data of user object attributes, such as selectable values, which should not be visible to the public.Show less

Insufficient privilege verification in Zammad v5.3.0 allows an authenticated attacker to perform changes on the tags of their customer tickets using the Zammad API. This is now corrected in v5.3.1 so that only agents with write permissions may change ticket tags.Show less

Zammad 5.2.1 has a fine-grained permission model that allows to configure read-only access to tickets. However, agents were still wrongly able to perform some operations on such tickets, like adding and removing links, tags. and related answers. This issue has been fixed in 5.2.2.Show less

Zammad 5.2.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Zammad's asset handling mechanism has logic to ensure that customer users are not able to see personal information of other users. This logic was not effective when used through a web socket connection, so that a logged-in attacker would be able to fetch personal data of other users by querying the Zammad API. This issue is fixed in , 5.2.2.Show less

Zammad 5.2.0 is vulnerable to privilege escalation. Zammad has a prevention against brute-force attacks trying to guess login credentials. After a configurable amount of attempts, users are invalidated and logins prevented. An attacker might work around this prevention, enabling them to send more than the configured amount of requests before the user invalidation takes place.Show less

In Zammad 5.2.0, an attacker could manipulate the rate limiting in the 'forgot password' feature of Zammad, and thereby send many requests for a known account to cause Denial Of Service by many generated emails which would also spam the victim.Show less

Zammad 5.2.0 suffers from Incorrect Access Control. Zammad did not correctly perform authorization on certain attachment endpoints. This could be abused by an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to attachments, such as emails or attached files.Show less

A lack of rate limiting in the 'forgot password' feature of Zammad v5.1.0 allows attackers to send an excessive amount of reset requests for a legitimate user, leading to a possible Denial of Service (DoS) via a large amount of generated e-mail messages.Show less

An access control issue in Zammad v5.0.3 allows attackers to write entries to the CTI caller log without authentication. This vulnerability can allow attackers to execute phishing attacks or cause a Denial of Service (DoS).Show less