← Back

Cloudforms

cloudforms

Vendor: Redhat • 48 CVEs

CVEs (48)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Redhat
2Cloudforms
Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 27, 2018
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protect...Show more
A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protection causing the routes to be used. This attack would require additional cross-site scripting or similar attacks in order to execute.Show less
1Redhat
2Ansible Tower
Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 27, 2018
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
9.0 HIGH· v2
A flaw was found in Ansible Tower's interface before 3.1.5 and 3.2.0 with SCM repositories. If a Tower project (SCM repository) definition does not have the 'delete before update' flag set, an attacker with commit access...Show more
A flaw was found in Ansible Tower's interface before 3.1.5 and 3.2.0 with SCM repositories. If a Tower project (SCM repository) definition does not have the 'delete before update' flag set, an attacker with commit access to the upstream playbook source repository could create a Trojan playbook that, when executed by Tower, modifies the checked out SCM repository to add git hooks. These git hooks could, in turn, cause arbitrary command and code execution as the user Tower runs as.Show less
1Redhat
2Cloudforms
Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 27, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow...Show more
It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms.Show less
1Redhat
2Cloudforms
Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 26, 2018
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1 lacks RBAC controls on certain methods in the rails application portion of CloudForms. An attacker with access could use a variety of methods within...Show more
CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1 lacks RBAC controls on certain methods in the rails application portion of CloudForms. An attacker with access could use a variety of methods within the rails application portion of CloudForms to escalate privileges.Show less
1Redhat
2Cloudforms
Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 26, 2018
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
In CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1, it was found that privilege check is missing when invoking arbitrary methods via filtering on VMs that MiqExpression will execute that is trigge...Show more
In CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1, it was found that privilege check is missing when invoking arbitrary methods via filtering on VMs that MiqExpression will execute that is triggerable by API users. An attacker could use this to execute actions they should not be allowed to (e.g. destroying VMs).Show less
1Redhat
2Cloudforms
Cloudforms Management Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 24, 2018
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
7.2 HIGH· v2
CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) is vulnerable to an improper security setting in the dRuby component of CloudForms. An attacker with access to an unprivileged local shell could use this flaw to execute commands as a...Show more
CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) is vulnerable to an improper security setting in the dRuby component of CloudForms. An attacker with access to an unprivileged local shell could use this flaw to execute commands as a high privileged user.Show less
3Canonical
DebianRedhat
6Ansible Engine
CloudformsDebian Linux+3 more
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 3, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Ansible 2.5 prior to 2.5.5, and 2.4 prior to 2.4.5, do not honor the no_log task flag for failed tasks. When the no_log flag has been used to protect sensitive data passed to a task from being logged, and that task does...Show more
Ansible 2.5 prior to 2.5.5, and 2.4 prior to 2.4.5, do not honor the no_log task flag for failed tasks. When the no_log flag has been used to protect sensitive data passed to a task from being logged, and that task does not run successfully, Ansible will expose sensitive data in log files and on the terminal of the user running Ansible.Show less
3Debian
RedhatSprockets Project
4Cloudforms
Debian LinuxEnterprise Linux+1 more
Nov 21, 2024
Jun 26, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
There is an information leak vulnerability in Sprockets. Versions Affected: 4.0.0.beta7 and lower, 3.7.1 and lower, 2.12.4 and lower. Specially crafted requests can be used to access files that exists on the filesystem t...Show more
There is an information leak vulnerability in Sprockets. Versions Affected: 4.0.0.beta7 and lower, 3.7.1 and lower, 2.12.4 and lower. Specially crafted requests can be used to access files that exists on the filesystem that is outside an application's root directory, when the Sprockets server is used in production. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the work arounds immediately.Show less
3Debian
RedhatRubyzip Project
3Cloudforms
Debian LinuxRubyzip
Nov 21, 2024
Jun 26, 2018
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
rubyzip gem rubyzip version 1.2.1 and earlier contains a Directory Traversal vulnerability in Zip::File component that can result in write arbitrary files to the filesystem. This attack appear to be exploitable via If a...Show more
rubyzip gem rubyzip version 1.2.1 and earlier contains a Directory Traversal vulnerability in Zip::File component that can result in write arbitrary files to the filesystem. This attack appear to be exploitable via If a site allows uploading of .zip files , an attacker can upload a malicious file that contains symlinks or files with absolute pathnames "../" to write arbitrary files to the filesystem..Show less
2Redhat
Sinatrarb
2Cloudforms
Sinatra
Nov 21, 2024
May 31, 2018
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Sinatra before 2.0.2 has XSS via the 400 Bad Request page that occurs upon a params parser exception.
1Redhat
2Ansible Tower
Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
May 2, 2018
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
Ansible Tower through version 3.2.3 has a vulnerability that allows users only with access to define variables for a job template to execute arbitrary code on the Tower server.
1Redhat
2Ansible Tower
Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
May 2, 2018
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
Ansible Tower before version 3.2.4 has a flaw in the management of system and organization administrators that allows for privilege escalation. System administrators that are members of organizations can have their passw...Show more
Ansible Tower before version 3.2.4 has a flaw in the management of system and organization administrators that allows for privilege escalation. System administrators that are members of organizations can have their passwords reset by organization administrators, allowing organization administrators access to the entire system.Show less
3Debian
ParamikoRedhat
11Ansible Engine
CloudformsDebian Linux+8 more
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 13, 2018
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
transport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly chec...Show more
transport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests, as demonstrated by channel-open. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step.Show less
3Canonical
PostgresqlRedhat
3Cloudforms
PostgresqlUbuntu Linux
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 2, 2018
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in the way Postgresql allowed a user to modify the behavior of a query for other users. An attacker with a user account could use this flaw to execute code with the permissions of superuser in the databa...Show more
A flaw was found in the way Postgresql allowed a user to modify the behavior of a query for other users. An attacker with a user account could use this flaw to execute code with the permissions of superuser in the database. Versions 9.3 through 10 are affected.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
Nov 21, 2024
Feb 28, 2018
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
A flaw was found in the CloudForms account configuration when using VMware. By default, a shared account is used that has privileged access to VMRC (VMWare Remote Console) functions that may not be appropriate for users...Show more
A flaw was found in the CloudForms account configuration when using VMware. By default, a shared account is used that has privileged access to VMRC (VMWare Remote Console) functions that may not be appropriate for users of CloudForms (and thus this account). An attacker could use this vulnerability to view and make changes to settings in the VMRC and virtual machines controlled by it that they should not have access to.Show less
4Canonical
DebianPostgresql+1 more
4Cloudforms
Debian LinuxPostgresql+1 more
Nov 21, 2024
Feb 9, 2018
N/A· v4
7.0 HIGH· v3
3.3 LOW· v2
In postgresql 9.3.x before 9.3.21, 9.4.x before 9.4.16, 9.5.x before 9.5.11, 9.6.x before 9.6.7 and 10.x before 10.2, pg_upgrade creates file in current working directory containing the output of `pg_dumpall -g` under um...Show more
In postgresql 9.3.x before 9.3.21, 9.4.x before 9.4.16, 9.5.x before 9.5.11, 9.6.x before 9.6.7 and 10.x before 10.2, pg_upgrade creates file in current working directory containing the output of `pg_dumpall -g` under umask which was in effect when the user invoked pg_upgrade, and not under 0077 which is normally used for other temporary files. This can allow an authenticated attacker to read or modify the one file, which may contain encrypted or unencrypted database passwords. The attack is infeasible if a directory mode blocks the attacker searching the current working directory or if the prevailing umask blocks the attacker opening the file.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectRedhat+1 more
4Cloudforms
Debian LinuxFedora+1 more
May 13, 2026
Aug 23, 2017
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
9.0 HIGH· v2
The XML-RPC server in supervisor before 3.0.1, 3.1.x before 3.1.4, 3.2.x before 3.2.4, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted XML-RPC request, related to nest...Show more
The XML-RPC server in supervisor before 3.0.1, 3.1.x before 3.1.4, 3.2.x before 3.2.4, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted XML-RPC request, related to nested supervisord namespace lookups.Show less
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
May 13, 2026
Jun 8, 2017
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
ManageIQ in CloudForms before 4.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code.
1Redhat
1Cloudforms
May 6, 2026
Aug 26, 2016
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
The web UI in Red Hat CloudForms 4.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving "Lack of field filters."
1Redhat
2Cloudforms
Cloudforms Management Engine
May 6, 2026
Apr 11, 2016
N/A· v4
5.1 MEDIUM· v3
1.9 LOW· v2
Red Hat CloudForms 3.2 Management Engine (CFME) 5.4.4 and CloudForms 4.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.5.0 do not properly encrypt data in the backend PostgreSQL database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive d...Show more
Red Hat CloudForms 3.2 Management Engine (CFME) 5.4.4 and CloudForms 4.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.5.0 do not properly encrypt data in the backend PostgreSQL database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive data and consequently gain privileges by leveraging access to (1) database exports or (2) log files.Show less