← Back

Node.js

node.js

Vendor: Nodejs • 189 CVEs

CVEs (189)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
5Debian
NodejsOpensuse+2 more
7Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native Environment
Debian LinuxEnterprise Linux+4 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 7, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Including trailing white space in HTTP header values in Nodejs 10, 12, and 13 causes bypass of authorization based on header value comparisons
6Debian
FedoraprojectNodejs+3 more
13Debian Linux
Enterprise LinuxEnterprise Linux Desktop+10 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 7, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
HTTP request smuggling in Node.js 10, 12, and 13 causes malicious payload delivery when transfer-encoding is malformed
5Debian
NodejsOpensuse+2 more
10Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native Environment
Debian LinuxEnterprise Linux+7 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 7, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Improper Certificate Validation in Node.js 10, 12, and 13 causes the process to abort when sending a crafted X.509 certificate
11Apache
AppleCanonical+8 more
18Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Linux+15 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These fra...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
23Clustered Data Ontap
Communications Element ManagerDebian Linux+20 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
19Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Linux+16 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman en...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
22Big Ip Local Traffic Manager
Debian LinuxDiskstation Manager+19 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.Show less
13Apache
AppleCanonical+10 more
28Big Ip Local Traffic Manager
Cloud InsightsDebian Linux+25 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream o...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
20Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Communications Broker+17 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that c...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.Show less
4Apache
AppleDebian+1 more
4Debian Linux
Node.jsSwiftnio+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depen...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
20Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Communications Broker+17 more
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified res...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.Show less
2Nodejs
Opensuse
2Leap
Node.js
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 28, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Keep-alive HTTP and HTTPS connections can remain open and inactive for up to 2 minutes in Node.js 6.16.0 and earlier. Node.js 8.0.0 introduced a dedicated server.keepAliveTimeout which defaults to 5 seconds. The behavior...Show more
Keep-alive HTTP and HTTPS connections can remain open and inactive for up to 2 minutes in Node.js 6.16.0 and earlier. Node.js 8.0.0 introduced a dedicated server.keepAliveTimeout which defaults to 5 seconds. The behavior in Node.js 6.16.0 and earlier is a potential Denial of Service (DoS) attack vector. Node.js 6.17.0 introduces server.keepAliveTimeout and the 5-second default.Show less
2Nodejs
Opensuse
2Leap
Node.js
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 28, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
In Node.js including 6.x before 6.17.0, 8.x before 8.15.1, 10.x before 10.15.2, and 11.x before 11.10.1, an attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by establishing an HTTP or HTTPS connection in keep-alive mode and...Show more
In Node.js including 6.x before 6.17.0, 8.x before 8.15.1, 10.x before 10.15.2, and 11.x before 11.10.1, an attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by establishing an HTTP or HTTPS connection in keep-alive mode and by sending headers very slowly. This keeps the connection and associated resources alive for a long period of time. Potential attacks are mitigated by the use of a load balancer or other proxy layer. This vulnerability is an extension of CVE-2018-12121, addressed in November and impacts all active Node.js release lines including 6.x before 6.17.0, 8.x before 8.15.1, 10.x before 10.15.2, and 11.x before 11.10.1.Show less
13Canonical
DebianF5+10 more
82A220 Firmware
A320 FirmwareA800 Firmware+79 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 27, 2019
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte r...Show more
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).Show less
1Nodejs
1Node.js
Oct 8, 2026
Nov 28, 2018
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Hostname spoofing in URL parser for javascript protocol: If a Node.js application is using url.parse() to determine the URL hostname, that hostna...Show more
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Hostname spoofing in URL parser for javascript protocol: If a Node.js application is using url.parse() to determine the URL hostname, that hostname can be spoofed by using a mixed case "javascript:" (e.g. "javAscript:") protocol (other protocols are not affected). If security decisions are made about the URL based on the hostname, they may be incorrect.Show less
2Nodejs
Suse
4Node.js
Suse Enterprise StorageSuse Linux Enterprise Server+1 more
Oct 8, 2026
Nov 28, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Slowloris HTTP Denial of Service: An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending headers very slowly keeping HTTP or HTTPS connection...Show more
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Slowloris HTTP Denial of Service: An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending headers very slowly keeping HTTP or HTTPS connections and associated resources alive for a long period of time.Show less
2Nodejs
Redhat
8Enterprise Linux
Enterprise Linux DesktopEnterprise Linux Eus+5 more
Oct 8, 2026
Nov 28, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Denial of Service with large HTTP headers: By using a combination of many requests with maximum sized headers (almost 80 KB per connection), and...Show more
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Denial of Service with large HTTP headers: By using a combination of many requests with maximum sized headers (almost 80 KB per connection), and carefully timed completion of the headers, it is possible to cause the HTTP server to abort from heap allocation failure. Attack potential is mitigated by the use of a load balancer or other proxy layer.Show less
1Nodejs
1Node.js
Oct 8, 2026
Nov 28, 2018
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0: Debugger port 5858 listens on any interface by default: When the debugger is enabled with `node --debug` or `node debug`, it listens to port 5858 on all interfaces by defaul...Show more
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0: Debugger port 5858 listens on any interface by default: When the debugger is enabled with `node --debug` or `node debug`, it listens to port 5858 on all interfaces by default. This may allow remote computers to attach to the debug port and evaluate arbitrary JavaScript. The default interface is now localhost. It has always been possible to start the debugger on a specific interface, such as `node --debug=localhost`. The debugger was removed in Node.js 8 and replaced with the inspector, so no versions from 8 and later are vulnerable.Show less
2Nodejs
Suse
4Node.js
Suse Enterprise StorageSuse Linux Enterprise Server+1 more
Oct 8, 2026
Nov 28, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0 and 8.14.0: HTTP request splitting: If Node.js can be convinced to use unsanitized user-provided Unicode data for the `path` option of an HTTP request, then data can be provi...Show more
Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0 and 8.14.0: HTTP request splitting: If Node.js can be convinced to use unsanitized user-provided Unicode data for the `path` option of an HTTP request, then data can be provided which will trigger a second, unexpected, and user-defined HTTP request to made to the same server.Show less
7Canonical
DebianNodejs+4 more
20Api Gateway
Application ServerDebian Linux+17 more
Oct 8, 2026
Nov 15, 2018
N/A· v4
4.7 MEDIUM· v3
1.9 LOW· v2
Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'.