← Back

Cloud Backup

cloud_backup

Vendor: Netapp • 345 CVEs

CVEs (345)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
2F5
Netapp
5Cloud Backup
Nginx Api Connectivity ManagerNginx Instance Manager+2 more
Jun 17, 2026
May 3, 2023
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
NGINX Management Suite may allow an authenticated attacker to gain access to configuration objects outside of their assigned environment.   Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are...Show more
NGINX Management Suite may allow an authenticated attacker to gain access to configuration objects outside of their assigned environment.   Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.Show less
2Intel
Netapp
2Active Management Technology Firmware
Cloud Backup
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Null pointer dereference in subsystem for Intel(R) AMT before versions 15.0.35 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via network access.
2Intel
Netapp
680Atom C3308 Firmware
Atom C3336 FirmwareAtom C3338 Firmware+677 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Improper input validation in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308 Firmware
Atom C3336 FirmwareAtom C3338 Firmware+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.6 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Improper initialization in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308 Firmware
Atom C3336 FirmwareAtom C3338 Firmware+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.6 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Improper access control in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308 Firmware
Atom C3336 FirmwareAtom C3338 Firmware+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.2 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Improper initialization in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308 Firmware
Atom C3336 FirmwareAtom C3338 Firmware+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Out-of-bounds read in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308 Firmware
Atom C3336 FirmwareAtom C3338 Firmware+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Pointer issues in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308 Firmware
Atom C3336 FirmwareAtom C3338 Firmware+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Buffer overflow in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
NULL pointer dereference in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Unchecked return value in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Insufficient control flow management in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Insufficient control flow management in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
2.1 LOW· v2
Incorrect default permissions in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable a denial of service via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
2.1 LOW· v2
Improper access control in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable a denial of service via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
681Atom C3308
Atom C3336Atom C3338+678 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
7.2 HIGH· v2
Improper access control in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
2Intel
Netapp
1611th Generation Core Series Firmware
Atom C3000 Series FirmwareAtom C610 Series Firmware+13 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2022
N/A· v4
6.6 MEDIUM· v3
7.2 HIGH· v2
Insufficient compartmentalization in HECI subsystem for the Intel(R) SPS before versions SPS_E5_04.01.04.516.0, SPS_E5_04.04.04.033.0, SPS_E5_04.04.03.281.0, SPS_E5_03.01.03.116.0, SPS_E3_05.01.04.309.0, SPS_02.04.00.101...Show more
Insufficient compartmentalization in HECI subsystem for the Intel(R) SPS before versions SPS_E5_04.01.04.516.0, SPS_E5_04.04.04.033.0, SPS_E5_04.04.03.281.0, SPS_E5_03.01.03.116.0, SPS_E3_05.01.04.309.0, SPS_02.04.00.101.0, SPS_SoC-A_05.00.03.114.0, SPS_SoC-X_04.00.04.326.0, SPS_SoC-X_03.00.03.117.0, IGN_E5_91.00.00.167.0, SPS_PHI_03.01.03.078.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.Show less
7Apache
AppleDebian+4 more
14Cloud Backup
Communications Element ManagerCommunications Operations Monitor+11 more
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 20, 2021
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might...Show more
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might be possible to craft one. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier.Show less
3Netapp
NodejsOpenssl
16500f Firmware
A250 FirmwareCloud Backup+13 more
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 14, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of me...Show more
Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL 3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains. By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0).Show less