Micollab

The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.1.3 could allow an attacker to access user data by performing a header injection in HTTP responses, due to the improper handling of input parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access user information.Show less

The Mitel MiCollab application before 9.1.332 for iOS could allow an unauthorized user to access restricted files and folders due to insufficient access control. An exploit requires a rooted iOS device, and (if successful) could allow an attacker to gain access to sensitive information,Show less

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web conferencing component of the Mitel MiCollab application before 9.0.15 for Android could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation in the file upload interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts.Show less

A vulnerability in the web conference chat component of MiCollab, versions 7.3 PR6 (7.3.0.601) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP2 (8.0.2.202), and MiVoice Business Express versions 7.3 PR3 (7.3.1.302) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP1 (8.0.2.202), could allow creation of unauthorized chat sessions, due to insufficient access controls. A successful exploit could allow execution of arbitrary commands.Show less

MiCollab 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) and earlier, 7.2 (7.2.2.13) and earlier, and 7.1 (7.1.0.57) and earlier and MiCollab AWV 6.3 (6.3.0.103), 6.2 (6.2.2.8), 6.1 (6.1.0.28), 6.0 (6.0.0.61), and 5.0 (5.0.5.7) have a Command Execution Vulnerability. Successful exploit of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary system commands.Show less

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4.Show less

The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.Show less