← Back

Web Gateway

web_gateway

Vendor: Mcafee • 41 CVEs

CVEs (41)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 20, 2022
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
A URL redirection vulnerability in Skyhigh SWG in main releases 10.x prior to 10.2.9, 9.x prior to 9.2.20, 8.x prior to 8.2.27, and 7.x prior to 7.8.2.31, and controlled release 11.x prior to 11.1.3 allows a remote attac...Show more
A URL redirection vulnerability in Skyhigh SWG in main releases 10.x prior to 10.2.9, 9.x prior to 9.2.20, 8.x prior to 8.2.27, and 7.x prior to 7.8.2.31, and controlled release 11.x prior to 11.1.3 allows a remote attacker to redirect a user to a malicious website controlled by the attacker. This is possible because SWG incorrectly creates a HTTP redirect response when a user clicks a carefully constructed URL. Following the redirect response, the new request is still filtered by the SWG policy.Show less
10Fedoraproject
FreebsdMcafee+7 more
33Capture Client
Cloud Volumes Ontap MediatorCommerce Guided Search+30 more
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 25, 2021
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in t...Show more
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).Show less
12Checkpoint
DebianFedoraproject+9 more
106Active Iq Unified Manager
Capture ClientCloud Volumes Ontap Mediator+103 more
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 25, 2021
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the...Show more
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).Show less
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Feb 17, 2021
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
9.0 HIGH· v2
Privilege escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.8 allows an authenticated user to gain elevated privileges through the User Interface and execute commands on the appliance via incorrect improp...Show more
Privilege escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.8 allows an authenticated user to gain elevated privileges through the User Interface and execute commands on the appliance via incorrect improper neutralization of user input in the troubleshooting page.Show less
8Beyondtrust
DebianFedoraproject+5 more
24Active Iq Unified Manager
Cloud BackupCommunications Performance Intelligence Center+21 more
Nov 10, 2025
Jan 26, 2021
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
7.2 HIGH· v2
Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash...Show more
Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash character.Show less
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 16, 2020
N/A· v4
5.7 MEDIUM· v3
2.7 LOW· v2
Privilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows authenticated user interface user to access protected dashboard data via improper access control in the user interface.
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 15, 2020
N/A· v4
5.7 MEDIUM· v3
2.7 LOW· v2
Privilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows authenticated user interface user to access protected configuration files via improper access control in the user interface.
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 15, 2020
N/A· v4
4.6 MEDIUM· v3
4.1 MEDIUM· v2
Privilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows authenticated user interface user to delete or download protected log data via improper access controls in the user interface.
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 15, 2020
N/A· v4
4.6 MEDIUM· v3
4.1 MEDIUM· v2
Privilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows authenticated user interface user to delete or download protected files via improper access controls in the REST interface.
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 15, 2020
N/A· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.7 HIGH· v2
Privilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows authenticated user interface user with low permissions to change the system's root password via improper access controls in the user in...Show more
Privilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows authenticated user interface user with low permissions to change the system's root password via improper access controls in the user interface.Show less
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 15, 2020
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Inappropriate Encoding for output context vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows a remote attacker to cause MWG to return an ambiguous redirect response via getting a user to click on a malicious...Show more
Inappropriate Encoding for output context vulnerability in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) prior to 9.2.1 allows a remote attacker to cause MWG to return an ambiguous redirect response via getting a user to click on a malicious URL.Show less
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 12, 2019
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Reflected Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Administrators web console in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) 7.8.x prior to 7.8.2.13 allows remote attackers to collect sensitive information or execute commands with the MWG adm...Show more
Reflected Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Administrators web console in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) 7.8.x prior to 7.8.2.13 allows remote attackers to collect sensitive information or execute commands with the MWG administrator's credentials via tricking the administrator to click on a carefully constructed malicious link.Show less
1Mcafee
4Active Response
Advanced Threat DefenseEnterprise Security Manager+1 more
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 11, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) earlier than 7.8.2.13 is vulnerable to a remote attacker exploiting CVE-2019-9517, potentially leading to a denial of service. This affects the scanning proxies.
1Mcafee
4Active Response
Advanced Threat DefenseEnterprise Security Manager+1 more
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 11, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) earlier than 7.8.2.13 is vulnerable to a remote attacker exploiting CVE-2019-9511, potentially leading to a denial of service. This affects the scanning proxies.
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 14, 2019
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
Clickjack vulnerability in Adminstrator web console in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) 7.8.2.x prior to 7.8.2.12 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page that contains an iframe via does no...Show more
Clickjack vulnerability in Adminstrator web console in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) 7.8.2.x prior to 7.8.2.12 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page that contains an iframe via does not send an X-Frame-Options HTTP header.Show less
1Mcafee
1Web Gateway
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 14, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Exfiltration of Data in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) 7.8.2.x prior to 7.8.2.12 allows attackers to obtain sensitive data via crafting a complex webpage that will trigger the Web Gateway to block the user accessing an iframe.
11Apache
AppleCanonical+8 more
18Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Linux+15 more
Jan 14, 2025
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These fra...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
23Clustered Data Ontap
Communications Element ManagerDebian Linux+20 more
Jan 14, 2025
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
19Debian Linux
Diskstation ManagerEnterprise Linux+16 more
Jan 14, 2025
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman en...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.Show less
12Apache
AppleCanonical+9 more
22Big Ip Local Traffic Manager
Debian LinuxDiskstation Manager+19 more
Jan 14, 2025
Aug 13, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one...Show more
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.Show less