← Back

Shibboleth Sp

shibboleth-sp

Vendor: Internet2 • 3 CVEs

CVEs (3)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Internet2
3Opensaml
Shibboleth SpXmltooling
Apr 23, 2026
Sep 29, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Buffer overflow in OpenSAML before 1.1.3 as used in Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.4, and XMLTooling before 1.2.2 as used in Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 2.x before 2.2....Show more
Buffer overflow in OpenSAML before 1.1.3 as used in Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.4, and XMLTooling before 1.2.2 as used in Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 2.x before 2.2.1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a malformed encoded URL.Show less
1Internet2
1Shibboleth Sp
Apr 23, 2026
Sep 29, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.3 and 2.x before 2.2.1, when using PKIX trust validation, does not properly handle a '\0' character in the subject or subjectAltName fields of a certificate...Show more
Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.3 and 2.x before 2.2.1, when using PKIX trust validation, does not properly handle a '\0' character in the subject or subjectAltName fields of a certificate, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.Show less
1Internet2
3Opensaml
Shibboleth SpXmltooling
Apr 23, 2026
Sep 29, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
OpenSAML 2.x before 2.2.1 and XMLTooling 1.x before 1.2.1, as used by Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider 2.x before 2.2.1, do not follow the KeyDescriptor element's Use attribute, which allows remote attackers to use...Show more
OpenSAML 2.x before 2.2.1 and XMLTooling 1.x before 1.2.1, as used by Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider 2.x before 2.2.1, do not follow the KeyDescriptor element's Use attribute, which allows remote attackers to use a certificate for both signing and encryption when it is designated for just one purpose, potentially weakening the intended security application of the certificate.Show less