A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.1, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.5, FortiSandbox 4.0.0 through 4.0.3, Forti...Show moreA improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.1, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.5, FortiSandbox 4.0.0 through 4.0.3, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.5 all versions, FortiSandbox 2.4.1 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests.Show less |
An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiManager 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below; FortiAnalyzer 7.0.2 and below, 6.4.7 and below; FortiOS 6.2.x and 6.0.x; FortiSandbox 4.0.x, 3.2.x and 3.1.x ma...Show moreAn improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiManager 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below; FortiAnalyzer 7.0.2 and below, 6.4.7 and below; FortiOS 6.2.x and 6.0.x; FortiSandbox 4.0.x, 3.2.x and 3.1.x may allow a network adjacent and unauthenticated attacker to man-in-the-middle the communication between the listed products and some external peers.Show less |
A improper privilege management in Fortinet FortiSandbox version 4.2.0 through 4.2.2, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2 and before 3.2.3 and FortiDeceptor version 4.1.0, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2 and before 3.3.3 allows a remote authenticat...Show moreA improper privilege management in Fortinet FortiSandbox version 4.2.0 through 4.2.2, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2 and before 3.2.3 and FortiDeceptor version 4.1.0, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2 and before 3.3.3 allows a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized API calls via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.Show less |
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] in Fortinet FortiSandbox version 4.2.0, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2, 3.2.0 through 3.2.3, 3.1.x and 3.0.x allows a rem...Show moreA improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] in Fortinet FortiSandbox version 4.2.0, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2, 3.2.0 through 3.2.3, 3.1.x and 3.0.x allows a remote and authenticated attacker with read permission to retrieve arbitrary files from the underlying Linux system via a crafted HTTP request.Show less |
A use of password hash with insufficient computational effort vulnerability [CWE-916] in FortiSandbox before 4.2.0 may allow an attacker with access to the password database to efficiently mount bulk guessing attacks to...Show moreA use of password hash with insufficient computational effort vulnerability [CWE-916] in FortiSandbox before 4.2.0 may allow an attacker with access to the password database to efficiently mount bulk guessing attacks to recover the passwords.Show less |
An insufficient logging [CWE-778] vulnerability in FortiSandbox versions 4.0.0 to 4.0.2, 3.2.0 to 3.2.3 and 3.1.0 to 3.1.5 and FortiDeceptor versions 4.2.0, 4.1.0 through 4.1.1, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2, 3.3.0 through 3.3.3,...Show moreAn insufficient logging [CWE-778] vulnerability in FortiSandbox versions 4.0.0 to 4.0.2, 3.2.0 to 3.2.3 and 3.1.0 to 3.1.5 and FortiDeceptor versions 4.2.0, 4.1.0 through 4.1.1, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2, 3.3.0 through 3.3.3, 3.2.0 through 3.2.2,3.1.0 through 3.1.1 and 3.0.0 through 3.0.2 may allow a remote attacker to repeatedly enter incorrect credentials without causing a log entry, and with no limit on the number of failed authentication attempts.Show less |
An improper input validation vulnerability in the sniffer interface of FortiSandbox before 3.2.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to silently halt the sniffer via specifically crafted requests. |
A missing cryptographic steps vulnerability in the function that encrypts users' LDAP and RADIUS credentials in FortiSandbox before 4.0.1, FortiWeb before 6.3.12, FortiADC before 6.2.1, FortiMail 7.0.1 and earlier may al...Show moreA missing cryptographic steps vulnerability in the function that encrypts users' LDAP and RADIUS credentials in FortiSandbox before 4.0.1, FortiWeb before 6.3.12, FortiADC before 6.2.1, FortiMail 7.0.1 and earlier may allow an attacker in possession of the password store to compromise the confidentiality of the encrypted secrets.Show less |
An insufficient session expiration vulnerability in FortiSandbox versions 3.2.1 and below may allow an attacker to reuse the unexpired admin user session IDs to gain information about other users configured on the device...Show moreAn insufficient session expiration vulnerability in FortiSandbox versions 3.2.1 and below may allow an attacker to reuse the unexpired admin user session IDs to gain information about other users configured on the device, should the attacker be able to obtain that session ID (via other, hypothetical attacks)Show less |
An improper access control vulnerability (CWE-284) in FortiSandbox versions 3.2.1 and below and 3.1.4 and below may allow an authenticated, unprivileged attacker to download the device configuration file via the recovery...Show moreAn improper access control vulnerability (CWE-284) in FortiSandbox versions 3.2.1 and below and 3.1.4 and below may allow an authenticated, unprivileged attacker to download the device configuration file via the recovery URL.Show less |
Multiple instances of improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerabilities in FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform an XSS attack via specifically crafted reque...Show moreMultiple instances of improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerabilities in FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform an XSS attack via specifically crafted request parameters.Show less |
An uncontrolled resource consumption (denial of service) vulnerability in the login modules of FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, 3.1.0 through 3.1.4, and 3.0.0 through 3.0.6; and FortiAuthenticator before 6.0.6 may allow...Show moreAn uncontrolled resource consumption (denial of service) vulnerability in the login modules of FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, 3.1.0 through 3.1.4, and 3.0.0 through 3.0.6; and FortiAuthenticator before 6.0.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bring the device into an unresponsive state via specifically-crafted long request parameters.Show less |
Multiple instances of heap-based buffer overflow in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an authenticated attacker to manipulate memory and alter its content by means of specifically crafted command l...Show moreMultiple instances of heap-based buffer overflow in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an authenticated attacker to manipulate memory and alter its content by means of specifically crafted command line arguments.Show less |
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, 3.1.0 through 3.1.4, and 3.0.0 through 3.0.6 may allow an authenticated attacker with access to the...Show moreAn improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, 3.1.0 through 3.1.4, and 3.0.0 through 3.0.6 may allow an authenticated attacker with access to the web GUI to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.Show less |
Instances of SQL Injection vulnerabilities in the checksum search and MTA-quarantine modules of FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, and 3.1.0 through 3.1.4 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code o...Show moreInstances of SQL Injection vulnerabilities in the checksum search and MTA-quarantine modules of FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, and 3.1.0 through 3.1.4 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code on the underlying SQL interpreter via specifically crafted HTTP requests.Show less |
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory vulnerabilities in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, and 3.1.0 through 3.1.4 may allow an authenticated user to obtain unauthorized access to files and data via...Show moreImproper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory vulnerabilities in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2, and 3.1.0 through 3.1.4 may allow an authenticated user to obtain unauthorized access to files and data via specifially crafted web requests.Show less |
An instance of small space of random values in the RPC API of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an attacker in possession of a few information pieces about the state of the device to possibly predict valid session IDs. |
An instance of improper neutralization of special elements in the sniffer module of FortiSandbox before 3.2.2 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute commands on the underlying system's shell via altering the...Show moreAn instance of improper neutralization of special elements in the sniffer module of FortiSandbox before 3.2.2 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute commands on the underlying system's shell via altering the content of its configuration file.Show less |
A concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 3.2.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to bring the system into an unresponsive...Show moreA concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 3.2.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to bring the system into an unresponsive state via specifically orchestrated sequences of commands.Show less |
A reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox before 3.0 may allow an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the back_url parameter in the file scan component. |