← Back
CWE-94

6,456 CVEs • Abstraction: Base • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (6,456)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Esri
1Arcmap
Apr 29, 2026
Jul 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
ESRI ArcMap 9 and ArcGIS 10.0.2.3200 and earlier does not properly prompt users before executing embedded VBA macros, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary VBA code via a crafted map (.mxd) fil...Show more
ESRI ArcMap 9 and ArcGIS 10.0.2.3200 and earlier does not properly prompt users before executing embedded VBA macros, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary VBA code via a crafted map (.mxd) file.Show less
1Glpi Project
1Glpi
Apr 29, 2026
Jul 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in front/popup.php in GLPI 0.78 through 0.80.61 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the sub_type parameter.
1Cisco
15Telepresence Manager
Telepresence Multipoint SwitchTelepresence Multipoint Switch Software+12 more
Apr 29, 2026
Jul 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
8.3 HIGH· v2
The Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) implementation on Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch before 1.9.0, Cisco TelePresence Immersive Endpoint Devices before 1.9.1, Cisco TelePresence Manager before 1.9.0, and Cisco TeleP...Show more
The Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) implementation on Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch before 1.9.0, Cisco TelePresence Immersive Endpoint Devices before 1.9.1, Cisco TelePresence Manager before 1.9.0, and Cisco TelePresence Recording Server before 1.8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging certain adjacency and sending a malformed CDP packet, aka Bug IDs CSCtz40953, CSCtz40947, CSCtz40965, and CSCtz40953.Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jul 10, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Attribute Remove Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jul 10, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Cached Object Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
1Microsoft
6Windows 2003 Server
Windows 7Windows Server 2003+3 more
Apr 29, 2026
Jul 10, 2012
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
The Shell in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2, R2, and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 Gold and SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a craft...Show more
The Shell in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2, R2, and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 Gold and SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted name for a (1) file or (2) directory, aka "Command Injection Vulnerability."Show less
1Ibm
1Lotus Notes
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 20, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
The URL handler in IBM Lotus Notes 8.x before 8.5.3 FP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted notes:// URL.
1Vmware
4Esx
EsxiPlayer+1 more
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 14, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
VMware Workstation 8.x before 8.0.4, VMware Player 4.x before 4.0.4, VMware ESXi 3.5 through 5.0, and VMware ESX 3.5 through 4.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) via crafted traffic fr...Show more
VMware Workstation 8.x before 8.0.4, VMware Player 4.x before 4.0.4, VMware ESXi 3.5 through 5.0, and VMware ESX 3.5 through 4.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) via crafted traffic from a remote virtual device.Show less
1Adobe
1Coldfusion
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 13, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Component Browser in Adobe ColdFusion 8.0 through 9.0.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 and 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "OnRowsInserted Event Remote Code Execution Vulne...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 and 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "OnRowsInserted Event Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "insertRow Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilit...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "insertRow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by attempting to access an undefined memory location, aka "insertAdjacentText Re...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by attempting to access an undefined memory location, aka "insertAdjacentText Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "OnBeforeDeactivate Event Remote Code Executi...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "OnBeforeDeactivate Event Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Title Element Change Remote Code Execution V...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Title Element Change Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9, and 10 Consumer Preview, does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by attempting to access a nonexistent object, leading...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9, and 10 Consumer Preview, does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by attempting to access a nonexistent object, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow, aka "Col Element Remote Code Execution Vulnerability," as demonstrated by VUPEN during a Pwn2Own competition at CanSecWest 2012.Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Same ID Property Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 and 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Developer Toolbar Remote Code Exec...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 and 9 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Developer Toolbar Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
1.net Framework
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly handle function pointers, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a...Show more
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly handle function pointers, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Memory Access Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
1Internet Explorer
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Center Element Remote Code Execution Vulnera...Show more
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a deleted object, aka "Center Element Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."Show less
1Microsoft
5Windows 7
Windows Server 2003Windows Server 2008+2 more
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2012
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
The Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) implementation in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2, R2, and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 Gold and SP1 does not properly proc...Show more
The Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) implementation in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2, R2, and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 Gold and SP1 does not properly process packets in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending crafted RDP packets triggering access to an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, aka "Remote Desktop Protocol Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-0002.Show less