IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeratio...Show moreIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.Show less |
Gitingest through 0.3.1 fails to properly validate hostnames in _validate_host, accepting any host with a git., gitlab., or github. prefix regardless of known-hosts list membership. Attackers can submit URLs with attacke...Show moreGitingest through 0.3.1 fails to properly validate hostnames in _validate_host, accepting any host with a git., gitlab., or github. prefix regardless of known-hosts list membership. Attackers can submit URLs with attacker-controlled hostnames to trigger outbound connections to arbitrary hosts and disclose GitHub personal access tokens via HTTP basic credentials.Show less |
bisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication and applies no URL scheme restrictions or host filtering. Un...Show morebisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication and applies no URL scheme restrictions or host filtering. Unauthenticated attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to enumerate internal network services and cloud metadata endpoints, then retrieve captured responses from object storage using caller-supplied object names.Show less |
Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addre...Show morePortkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addresses and forward requests with Authorization headers to reach internal services and exfiltrate provider API keys.Show less |
Qwen-Agent through 0.0.34 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the document parsing path that treats caller-supplied paths as URLs without scheme restriction or host validation. Attackers can reach the...Show moreQwen-Agent through 0.0.34 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the document parsing path that treats caller-supplied paths as URLs without scheme restriction or host validation. Attackers can reach the unauthenticated Gradio interface to make the server issue HTTP requests to arbitrary internal addresses including metadata services and read retrieved content through parsed document output.Show less |
Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the OIDC SSO connector creation endpoint that fails to validate the issuer URL parameter. Tenant administrators with Management API credentials...Show moreLogto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the OIDC SSO connector creation endpoint that fails to validate the issuer URL parameter. Tenant administrators with Management API credentials can supply arbitrary internal URLs to trigger HTTP GET requests to private network services, with response content returned in API responses.Show less |
Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/hooks/:id/test endpoint that accepts arbitrary URLs without host validation. Tenant administrators with Management API tokens can...Show moreLogto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/hooks/:id/test endpoint that accepts arbitrary URLs without host validation. Tenant administrators with Management API tokens can make the server issue HTTP POST requests to internal URLs and retrieve response bodies from services on the private network.Show less |
Bifrost is an enterprise AI gateway for routing requests to model providers. Prior to 1.5.17, the isPublicIP function in core/providers/utils/fetch.go, reached through FetchAndEncodeURL for Bedrock and Vertex image or do...Show moreBifrost is an enterprise AI gateway for routing requests to model providers. Prior to 1.5.17, the isPublicIP function in core/providers/utils/fetch.go, reached through FetchAndEncodeURL for Bedrock and Vertex image or document URLs, classifies Carrier-Grade NAT 100.64.0.0/10, IPv6 6to4 2002::/16, NAT64 64:ff9b::/96 and 64:ff9b:1::/48, and deprecated IPv6 site-local fec0::/10 addresses as public. A remote attacker who controls a multimodal request URL can make the gateway fetch internal services, including a cloud instance metadata endpoint encoded through 6to4 or NAT64. This issue is fixed in version 1.5.17.Show less |
Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.17.0, the Kubeflow Pipelines frontend exposes an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability th...Show moreKubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.17.0, the Kubeflow Pipelines frontend exposes an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability through the /_proxy/ route in frontend/server/proxy-middleware.ts. The _routePathWithReferer() function accepts an arbitrary attacker-controlled HTTP or HTTPS target and passes its origin to createProxyMiddleware without a host allowlist or filtering for loopback, link-local, RFC1918, or cluster-local addresses. The route remains outside the authorization middleware when ENABLE_AUTHZ=true and is reachable through /apis/v1beta1/_proxy/, /apis/v2beta1/_proxy/, /pipeline/apis/v1beta1/_proxy/, and /pipeline/apis/v2beta1/_proxy/, including through a crafted Referer header. Requests can forward attacker-controlled methods, headers such as Authorization, Cookie, and X-Forwarded-For, and POST bodies to reachable internal services, while returning the upstream response to the unauthenticated client. This can expose cloud metadata credentials, Kubernetes or service APIs, and other cluster-internal endpoints to unauthorized read or modification. This issue is fixed in version 2.17.0.Show less |
The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.4. This is due to the `load_previous_field_value()` method in `class-evf-form-task.php` accept...Show moreThe Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.4. This is due to the `load_previous_field_value()` method in `class-evf-form-task.php` accepting arbitrary URL values from `$_POST` data for upload fields without domain restriction, which are then passed to `wp_remote_head()` in the `get_local_file_size()` method of `class-evf-form-fields-upload.php`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force the WordPress server to make outbound HTTP HEAD requests to arbitrary URLs by submitting a form with an upload field containing a malicious URL while leaving a required field empty to trigger form re-rendering.Show less |
Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the query import endpoint that fails to validate user-supplied URLs before fetching content. Attackers can submit arbitrary URLs to re...Show moreBudibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the query import endpoint that fails to validate user-supplied URLs before fetching content. Attackers can submit arbitrary URLs to retrieve responses from internal services including cloud metadata endpoints and other restricted network resources.Show less |
Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the datasource verify endpoint that allows builder-level users to supply arbitrary URLs without SSRF validation. Attackers can exploit...Show moreBudibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the datasource verify endpoint that allows builder-level users to supply arbitrary URLs without SSRF validation. Attackers can exploit this to leak internal CouchDB credentials by making requests to attacker-controlled servers, gaining full database access in cloud deployments.Show less |
Budibase backend-core (@budibase/backend-core, as used by @budibase/server) omits the shared address space range 100.64.0.0/10 from its default SSRF blacklist (DEFAULT_BLACKLIST) used by REST datasource query previews. W...Show moreBudibase backend-core (@budibase/backend-core, as used by @budibase/server) omits the shared address space range 100.64.0.0/10 from its default SSRF blacklist (DEFAULT_BLACKLIST) used by REST datasource query previews. When the default blacklist is active (i.e., a self-hosted deployment has not defined BLACKLIST_IPS), an authenticated user with the Builder permission can submit a REST datasource query preview request to POST /api/queries/preview targeting a reachable HTTP(S) service in the 100.64.0.0/10 range, causing the server to send a request to that target and return its response through the preview flow. Per the advisory, no released fix was identified at the time of publication; remediation is to add 100.64.0.0/10 to DEFAULT_BLACKLIST.Show less |
SiYuan versions before v3.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the http_request and web_fetch agent tools that perform DNS resolution only at guard time without validating the connect-time resolutio...Show moreSiYuan versions before v3.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the http_request and web_fetch agent tools that perform DNS resolution only at guard time without validating the connect-time resolution. Attackers can use DNS rebinding to answer the guard resolution with a public IP and the connect resolution with a private or metadata IP, bypassing the SSRF defense to access cloud instance metadata and internal services.Show less |
A server-ide request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webhook in Synology Chat Server before 2.4.5-22148 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information. |
wallabag 2 through 2.6.14 allows SSRF because a crafted title or content field is mishandled during PDF export. |
A blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Database Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network syste...Show moreA blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Database Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.Show less |
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension FTP Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems. |
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Email Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems. |
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Remote Backup Connection Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network sy...Show moreA server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Remote Backup Connection Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.Show less |