← Back
CWE-918

3,430 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (3,430)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Open Xchange
1Open Xchange Appsuite
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 14, 2019
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
OX App Suite 7.10.1 and 7.10.2 allows SSRF.
1Graphite Project
1Graphite
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 11, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
send_email in graphite-web/webapp/graphite/composer/views.py in Graphite through 1.1.5 is vulnerable to SSRF. The vulnerable SSRF endpoint can be used by an attacker to have the Graphite web server request any resource....Show more
send_email in graphite-web/webapp/graphite/composer/views.py in Graphite through 1.1.5 is vulnerable to SSRF. The vulnerable SSRF endpoint can be used by an attacker to have the Graphite web server request any resource. The response to this SSRF request is encoded into an image file and then sent to an e-mail address that can be supplied by the attacker. Thus, an attacker can exfiltrate any information.Show less
1Zingbox
1Inspector
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 9, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A security vulnerability exists in the Zingbox Inspector versions 1.294 and earlier, that can allow an attacker to easily identify instances of Zingbox Inspectors in a local area network.
1Tcpdump
1Libpcap
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 3, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 allows SSRF because a URL may be provided as a capture source.
1Salesagility
1Suitecrm
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
SalesAgility SuiteCRM 7.10.x 7.10.19 and 7.11.x before and 7.11.7 has SSRF.
1Themeisle
1Visualizer
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 30, 2019
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
A blind SSRF vulnerability exists in the Visualizer plugin before 3.3.1 for WordPress via wp-json/visualizer/v1/upload-data.
1Ibm
1Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 26, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the QRadar system, potentially leading to network enumeration...Show more
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the QRadar system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 160014.Show less
1Pydio
1Pydio
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 19, 2019
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Pydio 6.0.8 allows Authenticated SSRF during a Remote Link Feature download. An attacker can specify an intranet address in the file parameter to index.php, when sending a file to a remote server, as demonstrated by the...Show more
Pydio 6.0.8 allows Authenticated SSRF during a Remote Link Feature download. An attacker can specify an intranet address in the file parameter to index.php, when sending a file to a remote server, as demonstrated by the file=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.1.2 substring.Show less
1Schneider Electric
4Meg6260 0410 Firmware
Meg6260 0415 FirmwareMeg6501 0001 Firmware+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 17, 2019
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): CWE-918 vulnerability exists in U.motion Server (MEG6501-0001 - U.motion KNX server, MEG6501-0002 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, MEG6260-0410 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 10, MEG62...Show more
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): CWE-918 vulnerability exists in U.motion Server (MEG6501-0001 - U.motion KNX server, MEG6501-0002 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, MEG6260-0410 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 10, MEG6260-0415 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 15), which could cause server configuration data to be exposed when an attacker modifies a URL.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 12.0 through 12.2.1. Non-members were able to comment on merge requests despite the repository being set to allow only project members to do so.
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.14 through 12.2.1. The Jira integration contains a SSRF vulnerability as a result of a bypass of the current protection mechanisms against this type of...Show more
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.14 through 12.2.1. The Jira integration contains a SSRF vulnerability as a result of a bypass of the current protection mechanisms against this type of attack, which would allow sending requests to any resources accessible in the local network by the GitLab server.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.1 through 12.2.1. Protections against SSRF attacks on the Kubernetes integration are insufficient, which could have allowed an attacker to request any...Show more
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.1 through 12.2.1. Protections against SSRF attacks on the Kubernetes integration are insufficient, which could have allowed an attacker to request any local network resource accessible from the GitLab server.Show less
1Atlassian
1Jira Server
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 11, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
The /plugins/servlet/gadgets/makeRequest resource in Jira before version 8.4.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a l...Show more
The /plugins/servlet/gadgets/makeRequest resource in Jira before version 8.4.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a logic bug in the JiraWhitelist class.Show less
1Mendix
1Mendix
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 10, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
In Mendix 7.23.5 and earlier, issue in XML import mappings allow DOCTYPE declarations in the XML input that is potentially unsafe.
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 9, 2019
N/A· v4
7.0 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in GitLab Enterprise Edition before 11.5.8, 11.6.x before 11.6.6, and 11.7.x before 11.7.1. The Jira integration feature is vulnerable to an unauthenticated blind SSRF issue.
1Cisco
1Unified Contact Center Express
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 5, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on a targeted system...Show more
A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on a targeted system. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input on the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending the user of the web application a crafted request. If the request is processed, the attacker could access the system and perform unauthorized actions.Show less
1Cisco
1Finesse
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 5, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability in Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability exists because t...Show more
A vulnerability in Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability exists because the affected system does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to a user of the web application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the system and perform unauthorized actions.Show less
1Trms
1Tightrope Media Carousel
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 26, 2019
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
The fetch API in Tightrope Media Carousel before 7.1.3 has CarouselAPI/v0/fetch?url= SSRF. This has two potential areas for abuse. First, a specially crafted URL could be used in a phishing attack to hijack the trust the...Show more
The fetch API in Tightrope Media Carousel before 7.1.3 has CarouselAPI/v0/fetch?url= SSRF. This has two potential areas for abuse. First, a specially crafted URL could be used in a phishing attack to hijack the trust the user and the browser have with the website and could serve malicious content from a third-party attacker-controlled system. Second, arguably more severe, is the potential for an attacker to circumvent firewall controls, by proxying traffic, unauthenticated, into the internal network from the internet.Show less
1It Novum
1Openitcockpit
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 23, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
openITCOCKPIT before 3.7.1 allows SSRF, aka RVID 5-445b21.
1Neliosoftware
1Nelio Ab Testing
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 22, 2019
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
The nelio-ab-testing plugin before 4.5.11 for WordPress has SSRF in ajax/iesupport.php.