Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

A SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.4, 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. Users of other data bindings (including the default databinding) are not impacted.Show less

This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the PaperCut NG/MF server-side module that allows an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker's choosing.Show less

NextChat, also known as ChatGPT-Next-Web, is a cross-platform chat user interface for use with ChatGPT. Versions 2.11.2 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery and cross-site scripting. This vulnerability enables read access to internal HTTP endpoints but also write access using HTTP POST, PUT, and other methods. Attackers can also use this vulnerability to mask their source IP by forwarding malicious traffic intended for other Internet targets through these open proxies. As of time of publication, no patch is available, but other mitigation strategies are available. Users may avoid exposing the application to the public internet or, if exposing the application to the internet, ensure it is an isolated network with no access to any other internal resources. Show less

pictureproxy.php in the dirk1983 mm1.ltd source code f9f4bbc allows SSRF via the url parameter. NOTE: the references section has an archived copy of pictureproxy.php from its original GitHub location, but the repository name might later change because it is misleading.Show less

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the getFileFromRepo function of WonderCMS v3.1.3 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs into the pluginThemeUrl parameter.Show less

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the installUpdateThemePluginAction function of WonderCMS v3.1.3 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of crafted URLs into the installThemePlugin parameter.Show less

A vulnerability was found in LangChain langchain_community 0.0.26. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function load_local in the library libs/community/langchain_community/retrievers/tfidf.py of the component TFIDFRetriever. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 0.0.27 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-255372.Show less

The Friends plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.5 via the discover_available_feeds function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.Show less

An issue was discovered in RWS WorldServer before 11.7.3. An authenticated, remote attacker can perform a ws-legacy/load_dtd?system_id= blind SSRF attack to deploy JSP code to the Apache Axis service running on the localhost interface, leading to command execution.Show less

Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Haivision's Aviwest Manager and Aviwest Steamhub. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to enumerate internal network configuration without the need for credentials. An attacker could compromise an internal server and retrieve requests sent by other users.Show less

The Seraphinite Accelerator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.20.52 via the OnAdminApi_HtmlCheck function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.Show less

Should an instance of AnythingLLM be hosted on an internal network and the attacked be explicitly granted a permission level of manager or admin, they could link-scrape internally resolving IPs of other services that are on the same network as AnythingLLM. This would require the attacker also be able to guess these internal IPs as `/*` ranging is not possible, but could be brute forced. There is a duty of care that other services on the same network would not be fully open and accessible via a simple CuRL with zero authentication as it is not possible to set headers or access via the link collector.Show less