← Back
CWE-918

2,939 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (2,939)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Symantec
1Messaging Gateway
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 11, 2019
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Symantec Messaging Gateway, prior to 10.7.3, may be susceptible to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) exploit, which is a type of issue that can let an attacker send crafted requests from the backend server of a vulner...Show more
Symantec Messaging Gateway, prior to 10.7.3, may be susceptible to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) exploit, which is a type of issue that can let an attacker send crafted requests from the backend server of a vulnerable web application or access services available through the loopback interface.Show less
1Enghouse
1Web Chat
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 13, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
An SSRF issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.1.300.31. In any POST request, one can replace the port number at WebServiceLocation=http://localhost:8085/UCWebServices/ with a range of ports to determine what is vis...Show more
An SSRF issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.1.300.31. In any POST request, one can replace the port number at WebServiceLocation=http://localhost:8085/UCWebServices/ with a range of ports to determine what is visible on the internal network (as opposed to what general web traffic would see on the product's host). The response from open ports is different than from closed ports. The product does not allow one to change the protocol: anything except http(s) will throw an error; however, it is the type of error that allows one to determine if a port is open or not.Show less
1Magento
1Magento
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 6, 2019
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to modify store configurations can manipulate...Show more
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to modify store configurations can manipulate the connector api endpoint to enable remote code execution.Show less
1Magento
1Magento
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 6, 2019
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shippment settings can execute arbitrary code...Show more
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shippment settings can execute arbitrary code through server-side request forgery due to unsafe handling of a carrier gateway.Show less
1Igniterealtime
1Openfire
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 24, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in FaviconServlet.java in Ignite Realtime Openfire through 4.4.2 allows attackers to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests.
1Thycotic
1Secret Server
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 23, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
An SSRF issue was discovered in the legacy Web launcher in Thycotic Secret Server before 10.7.
1Universal Office Converter Project
1Universal Office Converter
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 21, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
The unoconv package before 0.9 mishandles untrusted pathnames, leading to SSRF and local file inclusion.
2Debian
Wordpress
2Debian Linux
Wordpress
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
WordPress before 5.2.4 has a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because Windows paths are mishandled during certain validation of relative URLs.
2Debian
Wordpress
2Debian Linux
Wordpress
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
WordPress before 5.2.4 has a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because URL validation does not consider the interpretation of a name as a series of hex characters.
1Open Xchange
1Open Xchange Appsuite
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 14, 2019
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
OX App Suite 7.10.1 and 7.10.2 allows SSRF.
1Graphite Project
1Graphite
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 11, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
send_email in graphite-web/webapp/graphite/composer/views.py in Graphite through 1.1.5 is vulnerable to SSRF. The vulnerable SSRF endpoint can be used by an attacker to have the Graphite web server request any resource....Show more
send_email in graphite-web/webapp/graphite/composer/views.py in Graphite through 1.1.5 is vulnerable to SSRF. The vulnerable SSRF endpoint can be used by an attacker to have the Graphite web server request any resource. The response to this SSRF request is encoded into an image file and then sent to an e-mail address that can be supplied by the attacker. Thus, an attacker can exfiltrate any information.Show less
1Zingbox
1Inspector
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 9, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A security vulnerability exists in the Zingbox Inspector versions 1.294 and earlier, that can allow an attacker to easily identify instances of Zingbox Inspectors in a local area network.
1Tcpdump
1Libpcap
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 3, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 allows SSRF because a URL may be provided as a capture source.
1Salesagility
1Suitecrm
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 2, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
SalesAgility SuiteCRM 7.10.x 7.10.19 and 7.11.x before and 7.11.7 has SSRF.
1Themeisle
1Visualizer
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 30, 2019
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
A blind SSRF vulnerability exists in the Visualizer plugin before 3.3.1 for WordPress via wp-json/visualizer/v1/upload-data.
1Ibm
1Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 26, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the QRadar system, potentially leading to network enumeration...Show more
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the QRadar system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 160014.Show less
1Pydio
1Pydio
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 19, 2019
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Pydio 6.0.8 allows Authenticated SSRF during a Remote Link Feature download. An attacker can specify an intranet address in the file parameter to index.php, when sending a file to a remote server, as demonstrated by the...Show more
Pydio 6.0.8 allows Authenticated SSRF during a Remote Link Feature download. An attacker can specify an intranet address in the file parameter to index.php, when sending a file to a remote server, as demonstrated by the file=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.1.2 substring.Show less
1Schneider Electric
4Meg6260 0410 Firmware
Meg6260 0415 FirmwareMeg6501 0001 Firmware+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 17, 2019
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): CWE-918 vulnerability exists in U.motion Server (MEG6501-0001 - U.motion KNX server, MEG6501-0002 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, MEG6260-0410 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 10, MEG62...Show more
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): CWE-918 vulnerability exists in U.motion Server (MEG6501-0001 - U.motion KNX server, MEG6501-0002 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, MEG6260-0410 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 10, MEG6260-0415 - U.motion KNX Server Plus, Touch 15), which could cause server configuration data to be exposed when an attacker modifies a URL.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2019
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 12.0 through 12.2.1. Non-members were able to comment on merge requests despite the repository being set to allow only project members to do so.
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.14 through 12.2.1. The Jira integration contains a SSRF vulnerability as a result of a bypass of the current protection mechanisms against this type of...Show more
An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.14 through 12.2.1. The Jira integration contains a SSRF vulnerability as a result of a bypass of the current protection mechanisms against this type of attack, which would allow sending requests to any resources accessible in the local network by the GitLab server.Show less