Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Citrix NetScaler VPX through NS12.0 53.13.nc allows an SSRF attack via the /rapi/read_url URI by an authenticated attacker who has a webapp account. The attacker can gain access to the nsroot account, and execute remote commands with root privileges.Show less

The copy function in application/admin/controller/Article.php in NoneCms 1.3.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal and external network resources via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), because URL validation only considers whether the URL contains the "csdn" substring.Show less

The Trello importer in Atlassian Jira before version 7.6.1 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). When running in an environment like Amazon EC2, this flaw maybe used to access to a metadata resource that provides access credentials and other potentially confidential information.Show less

phpBB version 3.2.0 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Remote Avatar function resulting allowing an attacker to perform port scanning, requesting internal content and potentially attacking such internal services via the web application.Show less

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Knowledge Management Configuration Service, EPBC and EPBC2 from 7.00 to 7.02; KMC-BC 7.30, 7.31, 7.40 and 7.50, that allows an attacker to manipulate the vulnerable application to send crafted requests on behalf of the application.Show less

The configuration file import for applications, spyware and vulnerability objects functionality in the web interface in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS before 6.1.19, 7.0.x before 7.0.19, and 7.1.x before 7.1.14 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks and consequently obtain sensitive information via vectors related to parsing of external entities.Show less

A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability could lead to remote code execution for authenticated administrators. This issue was introduced in version 2.2.0 of Hipchat Server and version 3.0.0 of Hipchat Data Center. Versions of Hipchat Server starting with 2.2.0 and before 2.2.6 are affected by this vulnerability. Versions of Hipchat Data Center starting with 3.0.0 and before 3.1.0 are affected.Show less

The flash-based vSphere Web Client (6.0 prior to 6.0 U3c and 5.5 prior to 5.5 U3f) i.e. not the new HTML5-based vSphere Client, contains SSRF and CRLF injection issues due to improper neutralization of URLs. An attacker may exploit these issues by sending a POST request with modified headers towards internal services leading to information disclosure.Show less

The UpdraftPlus plugin through 1.13.12 for WordPress has SSRF in the updraft_ajax_handler function in /wp-content/plugins/updraftplus/admin.php via an httpget subaction. NOTE: the vendor reports that this does not cross a privilege boundaryShow less

The Recurly Client .NET Library before 1.0.1, 1.1.10, 1.2.8, 1.3.2, 1.4.14, 1.5.3, 1.6.2, 1.7.1, 1.8.1 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability due to incorrect use of "Uri.EscapeUriString" that could result in compromise of API keys or other critical resources.Show less

The Recurly Client Python Library before 2.0.5, 2.1.16, 2.2.22, 2.3.1, 2.4.5, 2.5.1, 2.6.2 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the "Resource.get" method that could result in compromise of API keys or other critical resources.Show less

The Recurly Client Ruby Library before 2.0.13, 2.1.11, 2.2.5, 2.3.10, 2.4.11, 2.5.4, 2.6.3, 2.7.8, 2.8.2, 2.9.2, 2.10.4, 2.11.3 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the "Resource#find" method that could result in compromise of API keys or other critical resources.Show less

Mahara 1.8 before 1.8.7 and 1.9 before 1.9.5 and 1.10 before 1.10.3 and 15.04 before 15.04.0 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery attacks as not all processes of curl redirects are checked against a white or black list. Employing SafeCurl will prevent issues.Show less