← Back
CWE-918

2,678 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (2,678)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Group Office
1Group Office
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 14, 2021
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Group Office 6.4.196 allows a remote attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs via the url parameter to group/api/upload.php.
1Apache
1Solr
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 13, 2021
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
The ReplicationHandler (normally registered at "/replication" under a Solr core) in Apache Solr has a "masterUrl" (also "leaderUrl" alias) parameter that is used to designate another ReplicationHandler on another Solr co...Show more
The ReplicationHandler (normally registered at "/replication" under a Solr core) in Apache Solr has a "masterUrl" (also "leaderUrl" alias) parameter that is used to designate another ReplicationHandler on another Solr core to replicate index data into the local core. To prevent a SSRF vulnerability, Solr ought to check these parameters against a similar configuration it uses for the "shards" parameter. Prior to this bug getting fixed, it did not. This problem affects essentially all Solr versions prior to it getting fixed in 8.8.2.Show less
1Outsystems
3Lifetime Management Console
OutsystemsPlatform Server
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 12, 2021
N/A· v4
8.6 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
The ECT Provider component in OutSystems Platform Server 10 before 10.0.1104.0 and 11 before 11.9.0 (and LifeTime management console before 11.7.0) allows SSRF for arbitrary outbound HTTP requests.
1Ibm
1Websphere Application Server
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 8, 2021
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain s...Show more
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197502.Show less
1Wcms
1Wcms
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 7, 2021
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Server-side request forgery in Wcms 0.3.2 let an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the pagename parameter to wex/html.php. It can help identify open ports, local...Show more
Server-side request forgery in Wcms 0.3.2 let an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the pagename parameter to wex/html.php. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on local services.Show less
1Wcms
1Wcms
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 7, 2021
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Server-side request forgery in Wcms 0.3.2 lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the path parameter to wex/cssjs.php. It can help identify open ports, local ne...Show more
Server-side request forgery in Wcms 0.3.2 lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the path parameter to wex/cssjs.php. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on local services.Show less
1Likebtn Like Button Project
1Likebtn Like Button
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 5, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
The LikeBtn WordPress Like Button Rating ♥ LikeBtn WordPress plugin before 2.6.32 was vulnerable to Unauthenticated Full-Read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
1Magpierss Project
1Magpierss
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 2, 2021
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Because of no validation on a curl command in MagpieRSS 0.72 in the /extlib/Snoopy.class.inc file, when you send a request to the /scripts/magpie_debug.php or /scripts/magpie_simple.php page, it's possible to request any...Show more
Because of no validation on a curl command in MagpieRSS 0.72 in the /extlib/Snoopy.class.inc file, when you send a request to the /scripts/magpie_debug.php or /scripts/magpie_simple.php page, it's possible to request any internal page if you use a https request.Show less
2Apache
Oracle
6Business Intelligence
Communications Diameter Intelligence HubCommunications Element Manager+3 more
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 2, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
CXF supports (via JwtRequestCodeFilter) passing OAuth 2 parameters via a JWT token as opposed to query parameters (see: The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR)). Instead of sending...Show more
CXF supports (via JwtRequestCodeFilter) passing OAuth 2 parameters via a JWT token as opposed to query parameters (see: The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR)). Instead of sending a JWT token as a "request" parameter, the spec also supports specifying a URI from which to retrieve a JWT token from via the "request_uri" parameter. CXF was not validating the "request_uri" parameter (apart from ensuring it uses "https) and was making a REST request to the parameter in the request to retrieve a token. This means that CXF was vulnerable to DDos attacks on the authorization server, as specified in section 10.4.1 of the spec. This issue affects Apache CXF versions prior to 3.4.3; Apache CXF versions prior to 3.3.10.Show less
1Atlassian
2Confluence Data Center
Confluence Server
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 1, 2021
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
The WidgetConnector plugin in Confluence Server and Confluence Data Center before version 5.8.6 allowed remote attackers to manipulate the content of internal network resources via a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SS...Show more
The WidgetConnector plugin in Confluence Server and Confluence Data Center before version 5.8.6 allowed remote attackers to manipulate the content of internal network resources via a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.Show less
1Flycms Project
1Flycms
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 1, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in saveUrlAs function in ImagesService.java in sunkaifei FlyCMS version 20190503.
1Vmware
3Cloud Foundation
Vrealize Operations ManagerVrealize Suite Lifecycle Manager
Oct 30, 2025
Mar 31, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Server Side Request Forgery in vRealize Operations Manager API (CVE-2021-21975) prior to 8.4 may allow a malicious actor with network access to the vRealize Operations Manager API can perform a Server Side Request Forger...Show more
Server Side Request Forgery in vRealize Operations Manager API (CVE-2021-21975) prior to 8.4 may allow a malicious actor with network access to the vRealize Operations Manager API can perform a Server Side Request Forgery attack to steal administrative credentials.Show less
1F5
15Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerBig Ip Advanced Web Application Firewall+12 more
Oct 27, 2025
Mar 31, 2021
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
10.0 HIGH· v2
On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3 amd BIG-IQ 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.3 and 7.0.0.x before 7.0.0.2, the iControl REST...Show more
On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3 amd BIG-IQ 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.3 and 7.0.0.x before 7.0.0.2, the iControl REST interface has an unauthenticated remote command execution vulnerability. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated.Show less
1Salesforce
1Mule
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 26, 2021
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
MuleSoft is aware of a Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability affecting certain versions of a Mule runtime component that may affect both CloudHub and on-premise customers. This affects: Mule 3.8.x,3.9.x,4.x runtime r...Show more
MuleSoft is aware of a Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability affecting certain versions of a Mule runtime component that may affect both CloudHub and on-premise customers. This affects: Mule 3.8.x,3.9.x,4.x runtime released before February 2, 2021.Show less
1Mitreid
1Connect
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 25, 2021
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
The OpenID Connect server implementation for MITREid Connect through 1.3.3 contains a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises due to unsafe usage of the logo_uri parameter in the Dynami...Show more
The OpenID Connect server implementation for MITREid Connect through 1.3.3 contains a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises due to unsafe usage of the logo_uri parameter in the Dynamic Client Registration request. An unauthenticated attacker can make a HTTP request from the vulnerable server to any address in the internal network and obtain its response (which might, for example, have a JavaScript payload for resultant XSS). The issue can be exploited to bypass network boundaries, obtain sensitive data, or attack other hosts in the internal network.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 24, 2021
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions before 12.2. GitLab was vulnerable to a SSRF attack through the Outbound Requests feature.
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 24, 2021
N/A· v4
5.0 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 13.2. Gitlab was vulnerable to SRRF attack through the Prometheus integration.
1Spinetix
6Diva Firmware
DsosHmp300 Firmware+3 more
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 24, 2021
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
spxmanage on certain SpinetiX devices allows requests that access unintended resources because of SSRF and Path Traversal. This affects HMP350, HMP300, and DiVA through 4.5.2-1.0.36229; HMP400 and HMP400W through 4.5.2-1...Show more
spxmanage on certain SpinetiX devices allows requests that access unintended resources because of SSRF and Path Traversal. This affects HMP350, HMP300, and DiVA through 4.5.2-1.0.36229; HMP400 and HMP400W through 4.5.2-1.0.2-1eb2ffbd; and DSOS through 4.5.2-1.0.2-1eb2ffbd.Show less
6Apache
DebianFedoraproject+3 more
17Activemq
Banking Enterprise Default ManagementBanking Platform+14 more
May 23, 2025
Mar 23, 2021
N/A· v4
8.6 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publ...Show more
XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16.Show less
6Apache
DebianFedoraproject+3 more
15Activemq
Banking Enterprise Default ManagementBanking Platform+12 more
May 23, 2025
Mar 23, 2021
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability where the processed stream at unmarshalling time contains type information to recreate the...Show more
XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability where the processed stream at unmarshalling time contains type information to recreate the formerly written objects. XStream creates therefore new instances based on these type information. An attacker can manipulate the processed input stream and replace or inject objects, that result in a server-side forgery request. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16.Show less