← Back
CWE-918

4,014 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (4,014)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Microsoft
1Edge Chromium
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 3, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
1Microsoft
1Edge Chromium
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 3, 2026
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
1Microsoft
1Edge Chromium
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 3, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 3, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.2 have incomplete SSRF protection in webhook and migration allow-list filtering.
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 3, 2026
N/A· v4
8.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Eclipse Theia since version 1.26.0, the backend /services/request-service RPC accepts an attacker-controlled URL from any client connected to the standard /services messaging endpoint, performs the HTTP request server...Show more
In Eclipse Theia since version 1.26.0, the backend /services/request-service RPC accepts an attacker-controlled URL from any client connected to the standard /services messaging endpoint, performs the HTTP request server-side, and returns the full response body to the caller. Because the destination URL is neither validated nor allowlisted, a remote attacker with access to the Theia service connection can issue server-side HTTP requests to localhost or other backend-reachable hosts and read their responses, exposing internal administrative endpoints, cloud instance metadata services, and other resources that are intentionally outside the browser network boundary. The vulnerability affects deployments where the Theia service connection is reachable by untrusted users (for example, multi-tenant or publicly-reachable Theia deployments).Show less
-
-
Jul 6, 2026
Jul 3, 2026
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The WP Import Export Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.9.30 via the wpie_import_upload_file_from_url AJAX action. The plugin's URL downloader fir...Show more
The WP Import Export Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.9.30 via the wpie_import_upload_file_from_url AJAX action. The plugin's URL downloader first calls wp_safe_remote_get() (which correctly blocks private/reserved IP ranges), but when that call returns a WP_Error — the exact outcome for any blocked internal host — the Download::download_file() method falls back to GuzzleHttp\Client::request() with the original attacker-supplied URL and no SSRF protection (and with TLS verification disabled). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services such as the cloud metadata endpoint at 169.Show less
1Microsoft
1Entra Provisioning Service
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
1Microsoft
1Azure Openai
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
AutoBangumi before 3.2.8 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to probe internal network services by supplying arbitrary host values to an unprotected se...Show more
AutoBangumi before 3.2.8 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to probe internal network services by supplying arbitrary host values to an unprotected setup endpoint. Attackers can send requests to the POST /api/v1/setup/test-downloader endpoint during the initial setup window, causing the server to issue HTTP GET requests to internal or reserved addresses and leak information through echoed connection-error messages.Show less
-
-
Sep 30, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
8.3 HIGH· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
LobeChat before 2.2.10-canary.18 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to direct internal HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs by supplying user-controlled input to the skill...Show more
LobeChat before 2.2.10-canary.18 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to direct internal HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs by supplying user-controlled input to the skill import service (importFromUrl) and topic cover update (fetchImageFromUrl) endpoints, which use the global fetch without the project's ssrf-safe-fetch wrapper. Attackers can target internal addresses such as cloud instance metadata endpoints through these unprotected code paths to disclose internal service responses and cloud credentials.Show less
1Ui
1Unifi Protect
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in UniFi Protect Application to escalate privileges on the host device.
1Ui
1Unifi Talk Application
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability found in UniFi Talk Application to execute a Denial of Service (DoS) attack and bypass authentication in certa...Show more
A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability found in UniFi Talk Application to execute a Denial of Service (DoS) attack and bypass authentication in certain UniFi Talk API endpoints.Show less
1Ui
32Enterprise Firewall Core Firmware
Enterprise Fortress Gateway FirmwareEnterprise Network Video Recorder Core Firmware+29 more
Jul 10, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) to escalate privileges within such UniFi OS devices or instances.
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Subscriber Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.161 versions.
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Paid Member Subscriptions <= 3.0.4 versions.
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
liboauth2 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in oauth2_jose_jwks_aws_alb_resolve() function. The AWS ALB verifier reads both signer and kid from the unverified JWT header. If signer matches the configured ARN,...Show more
liboauth2 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in oauth2_jose_jwks_aws_alb_resolve() function. The AWS ALB verifier reads both signer and kid from the unverified JWT header. If signer matches the configured ARN, kid is appended to alb_base_url without URL encoding or path sanitization, and the HTTP GET is issued before signature verification. This allows an attacker to force the server to send a GET request to an attacker-chosen internal path. This issue was fixed in version 2.3.0Show less
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
N/A· v4
8.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
PIA's OIDC issuer allowlist for Jenkins tokens uses a bare string-prefix check (issuer.startswith(' https://ci.eclipse.org ') in is_issuer_known, pia/models.py:139) instead of validating the issuer as a properly host-bou...Show more
PIA's OIDC issuer allowlist for Jenkins tokens uses a bare string-prefix check (issuer.startswith(' https://ci.eclipse.org ') in is_issuer_known, pia/models.py:139) instead of validating the issuer as a properly host-bounded URL. An attacker can craft an issuer such as https://ci.eclipse.org@evil.host (userinfo trick) or https://ci.eclipse.org.evil.host (suffix trick) that satisfies the prefix check while pointing the OIDC discovery and JWKS fetches at a server the attacker controls. An unauthenticated caller of POST /v1/upload/sbom can use this to force PIA to make outbound HTTP(S) requests to an arbitrary attacker-chosen host, and to have oidc.verify_token accept a JWT signed with the attacker's own key.Show less
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 2, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 4.0.0-RC1 and above, prior to 4.18.0 and 5.0.0-RC1, and above, prior to 5.10.0, are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and Arbitrary JavaScript Injec...Show more
Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 4.0.0-RC1 and above, prior to 4.18.0 and 5.0.0-RC1, and above, prior to 5.10.0, are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and Arbitrary JavaScript Injection through the /actions/app/resource-js endpoint. By exploiting the default permissive trustedHosts configuration, an attacker can poison the Host or X-Forwarded-Host header to manipulate the application’s $baseUrl. This bypasses the endpoint’s internal URL validation, forcing the backend Guzzle client to fetch a malicious payload from an attacker-controlled server and reflect it to the client with a Content-Type: application/javascript header. The vulnerability manifests when assetManager.cacheSourcePaths is set to false. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.18.0 and 5.10.0.Show less
1Nvidia
1Nemo Megatron Bridge
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 1, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause server-side request forgery. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure.
-
-
Oct 25, 2026
Jul 1, 2026
9.0 CRITICAL· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
The payment integration pretix-oppwa provides support for the payment providers VR Payment, Hobex, and potentially others based on Oppwa's technology. The integration of Oppwa, following their official documentation,...Show more
The payment integration pretix-oppwa provides support for the payment providers VR Payment, Hobex, and potentially others based on Oppwa's technology. The integration of Oppwa, following their official documentation, includes a step where the user is redirected from the payment provider back to our system with a query parameter like ?resourcePath=/v1/checkouts/{checkoutId}/payment in the URL. Our system is then supposed to fetch the status of the transaction from the URL given by baseUrl + resourcePath. Our plugin pretix-oppwa did so insecurely by concatenating the parameter form the URL to the base domain of the API without further validation and, critically, without a / at the end of the baseUrl. Therefore, an attacker could inject a resourcePath argument in a way that causes pretix to call a different server instead. Since the request includes the access token (API key) of the Oppwa account, this would leak the access token, giving access to data contained in the payment provider's system. This is fixed with the release today by strictly validating the given API URL. After installing the update, we recommend asking your payment provider for a new access token and updating it in pretix.Show less