← Back
CWE-918

2,678 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (2,678)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Jun 26, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-...Show more
An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing ReplyTo element in a Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) SOAP request. The attacker can not control the data sent in the SSRF connection, nor can the attacker receive any data back. This SSRF is suitable for TCP port scanning of an internal network when the Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) is exposed across a network segment.Show less
1Assaabloy
1Control Id Idsecure
Jul 2, 2025
Jun 24, 2025
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
ControlID iDSecure On-premises versions 4.7.48.0 and prior are vulnerable to a server-side request forgery vulnerability which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve information from other servers.
1Langchain
1Langchain
Jul 16, 2025
Jun 23, 2025
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the RequestsToolkit component of the langchain-community package (specifically, langchain_community.agent_toolkits.openapi.toolkit.RequestsToolkit) in langchai...Show more
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the RequestsToolkit component of the langchain-community package (specifically, langchain_community.agent_toolkits.openapi.toolkit.RequestsToolkit) in langchain-ai/langchain version 0.0.27. This vulnerability occurs because the toolkit does not enforce restrictions on requests to remote internet addresses, allowing it to also access local addresses. As a result, an attacker could exploit this flaw to perform port scans, access local services, retrieve instance metadata from cloud environments (e.g., Azure, AWS), and interact with servers on the local network. This issue has been fixed in version 0.0.28.Show less
1Maxkey
1Maxkey
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 23, 2025
2.1 LOW· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was found in Dromara MaxKey up to 4.1.7 and classified as critical. This issue affects the function Add of the file maxkey-webs\maxkey-web-mgt\src\main\java\org\dromara\maxkey\web\apps\contorller\SAML20De...Show more
A vulnerability was found in Dromara MaxKey up to 4.1.7 and classified as critical. This issue affects the function Add of the file maxkey-webs\maxkey-web-mgt\src\main\java\org\dromara\maxkey\web\apps\contorller\SAML20DetailsController.java of the component Meta URL Handler. The manipulation of the argument post leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less
-
-
Jun 23, 2025
Jun 23, 2025
N/A· v4
5.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
gateway_proxy_handler in MLflow before 3.1.0 lacks gateway_path validation.
-
-
Nov 20, 2025
Jun 20, 2025
7.8 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and...Show more
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and Targa 704 ILB. The application fails to validate user-supplied input in JSON POST parameters such as ipnotify_address and url, which are used by internal mechanisms to perform image fetch and DNS lookups. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to induce the system to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing firewall policies or conducting internal service enumeration. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-01-25 UTC.Show less
-
-
Apr 23, 2026
Jun 20, 2025
N/A· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BoldGrid Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid post-and-page-builder allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid: from n/a throu...Show more
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BoldGrid Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid post-and-page-builder allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid: from n/a through <= 1.27.8.Show less
-
-
Apr 23, 2026
Jun 20, 2025
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ali Irani Auto Upload Images auto-upload-images allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Upload Images: from n/a through <= 3.3.2.
-
-
Apr 23, 2026
Jun 20, 2025
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in blubrry PowerPress Podcasting powerpress allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects PowerPress Podcasting: from n/a through <= 11.13.11.
-
-
Apr 23, 2026
Jun 20, 2025
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Joe Hoyle WPThumb wp-thumb allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WPThumb: from n/a through <= 0.10.
-
-
Jun 23, 2025
Jun 19, 2025
2.7 LOW· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
PowSyBl (Power System Blocks) is a framework to build power system oriented software. Prior to version 6.7.2, in certain places, powsybl-core XML parsing is vulnerable to an XML external entity (XXE) attack and to a serv...Show more
PowSyBl (Power System Blocks) is a framework to build power system oriented software. Prior to version 6.7.2, in certain places, powsybl-core XML parsing is vulnerable to an XML external entity (XXE) attack and to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. This allows an attacker to elevate their privileges to read files that they do not have permissions to, including sensitive files on the system. The vulnerable class is com.powsybl.commons.xml.XmlReader which is considered to be untrusted in use cases where untrusted users can submit their XML to the vulnerable methods. This can be a multi-tenant application that hosts many different users perhaps with different privilege levels. This issue has been patched in com.powsybl:powsybl-commons: 6.7.2.Show less
-
-
Jun 23, 2025
Jun 19, 2025
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The Versa Director SD-WAN orchestration platform includes a Webhook feature for sending notifications to external HTTP endpoints. However, the "Add Webhook" and "Test Webhook" functionalities can be abused by an authenti...Show more
The Versa Director SD-WAN orchestration platform includes a Webhook feature for sending notifications to external HTTP endpoints. However, the "Add Webhook" and "Test Webhook" functionalities can be abused by an authenticated user to send crafted HTTP requests to localhost. This can be leveraged to execute commands on behalf of the versa user, who has sudo privileges, potentially leading to privilege escalation or remote code execution. Exploitation Status: Versa Networks is not aware of any reported instance where this vulnerability was exploited. Proof of concept for this vulnerability has been disclosed by third party security researchers. Workarounds or Mitigation: There are no workarounds to disable the GUI option. Versa recommends that Director be upgraded to one of the remediated software versions.Show less
1Trendmicro
1Apex Central
Sep 8, 2025
Jun 17, 2025
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (SaaS) could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. Please note...Show more
A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (SaaS) could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. Please note: this vulnerability only affects the SaaS instance of Apex Central - customers that automatically apply Trend Micro's monthly maintenance releases to the SaaS instance do not have to take any further action.Show less
1Trendmicro
1Apex Central
Sep 8, 2025
Jun 17, 2025
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modOSCE component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected install...Show more
A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modOSCE component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations.Show less
1Trendmicro
1Apex Central
Sep 8, 2025
Jun 17, 2025
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modTMSM component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected install...Show more
A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modTMSM component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations.Show less
-
-
Apr 23, 2026
Jun 17, 2025
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss ProfileGrid profilegrid-user-profiles-groups-and-communities allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ProfileGrid : from n/a through <= 5.9.5.2.
-
-
Apr 29, 2026
Jun 16, 2025
2.1 LOW· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was found in Intera InHire up to 20250530. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument 29chcotoo9 leads to server-side re...Show more
A vulnerability was found in Intera InHire up to 20250530. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument 29chcotoo9 leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less
2Cloudflare
Opennextjs
2Create Cloudflare
Opennext For Cloudflare
Aug 6, 2025
Jun 16, 2025
7.8 HIGH· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the @opennextjs/cloudflare package. The vulnerability stems from an unimplemented feature in the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next, which allowed unauth...Show more
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the @opennextjs/cloudflare package. The vulnerability stems from an unimplemented feature in the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next, which allowed unauthenticated users to proxy arbitrary remote content via the /_next/image endpoint. This issue allowed attackers to load remote resources from arbitrary hosts under the victim site’s domain for any site deployed using the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next.  For example: https://victim-site.com/_next/image?url=https://attacker.com In this example, attacker-controlled content from attacker.com is served through the victim site’s domain (victim-site.com), violating the same-origin policy and potentially misleading users or other services. Impact: * SSRF via unrestricted remote URL loading * Arbitrary remote content loading * Potential internal service exposure or phishing risks through domain abuse Mitigation: The following mitigations have been put in place: * Server side updates to Cloudflare’s platform to restrict the content loaded via the /_next/image endpoint to images. The update automatically mitigates the issue for all existing and any future sites deployed to Cloudflare using the affected version of the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next * Root cause fix https://github.com/opennextjs/opennextjs-cloudflare/pull/727  to the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next. The patched version of the adapter is found here  @opennextjs/cloudflare@1.3.0 https://www.npmjs.com/package/@opennextjs/cloudflare/v/1.3.0 * Package dependency update https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/pull/9608  to create-cloudflare (c3) to use the fixed version of the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next. The patched version of create-cloudflare is found here:  create-cloudflare@2.49.3 https://www.npmjs.com/package/create-cloudflare/v/2.49.3 In addition to the automatic mitigation deployed on Cloudflare’s platform, we encourage affected users to upgrade to @opennext/cloudflare v1.3.0 and use the remotePatterns https://nextjs.org/docs/pages/api-reference/components/image#remotepatterns filter in Next config https://nextjs.org/docs/pages/api-reference/components/image#remotepatterns if they need to allow-list external urls with images assets.Show less
1Sick
1Field Analytics
Jan 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2025
N/A· v4
5.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The application is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An endpoint can be used to send server internal requests to other ports.
1Fortinet
1Forticlientems
Jul 16, 2025
Jun 10, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A server-side request forgery vulnerability [CWE-918] in Fortinet FortiClientEMS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.6 may allow an authenticated attacker to perform internal requests via crafted HTTP or HTTPS req...Show more
A server-side request forgery vulnerability [CWE-918] in Fortinet FortiClientEMS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.6 may allow an authenticated attacker to perform internal requests via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.Show less