← Back
CWE-863

4,560 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (4,560)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Oct 7, 2026
Oct 5, 2026
N/A· v4
8.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, Plane's project invitation list endpoint is accessible to any authenticated user who knows the workspace slug and project ID, while the public project invi...Show more
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, Plane's project invitation list endpoint is accessible to any authenticated user who knows the workspace slug and project ID, while the public project invitation join endpoint accepts an invitation based only on a submitted email address. When a pending invitation targets an email address that has not registered with Plane, an attacker can enumerate the invitation, register an account using the invited email without mailbox verification, and accept the invitation. The attacker-controlled account is then added to the target workspace and project. This issue is fixed in 1.4.0.Show less
-
-
Oct 7, 2026
Oct 5, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, GET /api/workspaces/{slug}/cycles/ through WorkspaceCyclesEndpoint and GET /api/workspaces/{slug}/modules/ through WorkspaceModulesEndpoint return records...Show more
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, GET /api/workspaces/{slug}/cycles/ through WorkspaceCyclesEndpoint and GET /api/workspaces/{slug}/modules/ through WorkspaceModulesEndpoint return records from every project in a workspace without checking whether the requester belongs to each project. Any authenticated workspace member, including a Guest with access to only one project, can enumerate names, descriptions, sprint dates, issue counts, progress snapshots, external integration IDs, linked URLs, and member lists for cycles and modules in private projects. The sibling WorkspaceLabelsEndpoint and WorkspaceStatesEndpoint apply the correct project__project_projectmember__member=request.user filter, making the cycle and module endpoints inconsistent outliers. This issue is fixed in 1.4.0.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 5, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, WorkspaceOwnerPermission does not require is_active=True when checking whether a user is a workspace owner. A deactivated user can therefore remain authori...Show more
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, WorkspaceOwnerPermission does not require is_active=True when checking whether a user is a workspace owner. A deactivated user can therefore remain authorized as the workspace owner and retain owner-level access. This issue is fixed in 1.4.0.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 5, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
mppx-condition-gate provides conditional free-access wrappers for mppx payment methods. Prior to @insumermodel/mppx-condition-gate 3.0.0 and @insumermodel/mppx-token-gate 1.0.4, the packages read a wallet address from th...Show more
mppx-condition-gate provides conditional free-access wrappers for mppx payment methods. Prior to @insumermodel/mppx-condition-gate 3.0.0 and @insumermodel/mppx-token-gate 1.0.4, the packages read a wallet address from the client-supplied credential.source, checked whether that public address met configured on-chain conditions, and returned a successful free-access receipt without invoking the wrapped payment verifier or proving that the caller controlled the wallet. An unauthenticated attacker could name any qualifying wallet and obtain content that should require payment, and cached grants could be reused for the configured cache lifetime. The corrected packages prevent free-access authorization unless payer control has been established. These issues are fixed in @insumermodel/mppx-condition-gate 3.0.0 and @insumermodel/mppx-token-gate 1.0.4.Show less
-
-
Oct 5, 2026
Oct 4, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
ZITADEL 3.0.0 through 3.4.15 and 4.x before 4.17.3 contains an incorrect authorization flaw in the User Service API, which verifies user.read against the caller's organization rather than the organization owning the targ...Show more
ZITADEL 3.0.0 through 3.4.15 and 4.x before 4.17.3 contains an incorrect authorization flaw in the User Service API, which verifies user.read against the caller's organization rather than the organization owning the target user. An authenticated member holding org-scoped user.read can query GET /v2/users/{userId}/authentication_methods to learn which authentication method types users in other organizations have registered.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 4, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
ezBookkeeping 1.2.0 before 2.0.1 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows attackers holding an API token to obtain a full session token via /api/v1/tokens/refresh.json. Because TokenRefreshHandler never...Show more
ezBookkeeping 1.2.0 before 2.0.1 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows attackers holding an API token to obtain a full session token via /api/v1/tokens/refresh.json. Because TokenRefreshHandler never checks token type, attackers can exchange short-lived or IP-restricted API tokens for 30-day normal session tokens that bypass API token expiry and allowlists.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 4, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
LaraDashboard before 1.4.8 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users with only settings.view permission to read stored secrets through the settings API. Attackers can query GET /ap...Show more
LaraDashboard before 1.4.8 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users with only settings.view permission to read stored secrets through the settings API. Attackers can query GET /api/settings or /api/settings/{option_name} to retrieve plaintext AI provider API keys, mail credentials, passwords and tokens.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, validation of an MLS (RFC 9420) external commit's proposal list, org.bouncycastle.mls.protocol.Group.validateExternalCachedProposals, counted the proposals by type and bounded the r...Show more
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, validation of an MLS (RFC 9420) external commit's proposal list, org.bouncycastle.mls.protocol.Group.validateExternalCachedProposals, counted the proposals by type and bounded the removed leaf index but never established that the removed leaf had anything to do with the joiner. RFC 9420 sec. 12.2 permits at most one Remove proposal in an external commit, with which the joiner removes an old version of themselves, and requires that where one is present the LeafNode in the commit's path field meet the criteria it would have to meet in an Update for the removed leaf, in particular that its credential present identifiers acceptable for the removed participant. The ordinary proposal-list validator's self-remove rule is deliberately not applied on this path, because a resync commit legitimately removes a leaf the joiner owns, but nothing was put in its place. Any party holding the group's public GroupInfo, which is precisely what an external joiner is meant to be given, could therefore commit a Remove naming any member's LeafIndex and have every member apply it, evicting that member and taking over their slot in the ratchet tree. The credential check that should have prevented this existed only in the gRPC interop harness and so protected no other caller of the public Group.externalJoin and Group.handle API. An external commit carrying a Remove is now accepted only when the removed leaf's credential is identical to the one in the joiner's own new leaf, on both the sending and the receiving side.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 3, 2026
8.2 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPGP certificate API accepted a third-party certification or trust delegation from any component key of the issuing certificate, without requiring that component t...Show more
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPGP certificate API accepted a third-party certification or trust delegation from any component key of the issuing certificate, without requiring that component to have been granted the authority to certify. OpenPGPCertificate.getCertificationBy() and getDelegationBy() resolve a third-party signature by matching its issuer key identifier against every key of the third-party certificate, then verify the issuing component's binding chain and the signature itself; nothing checked that the issuing component carried the RFC 9580 sec. 5.2.3.29 certification key flag (CERTIFY_OTHER) when the signature was created. A subkey bound only with SIGN_DATA - the online signing subkey of exactly the offline-primary arrangement those key flags exist to express - could therefore issue a positive User ID certification over an attacker-controlled identity, or a full-trust depth-one direct-key delegation of introducer trust, and the API returned it as a valid signature chain attributed to the third-party certificate. An application treating getCertificationBy(...).isValid() or getDelegationBy(...) as an identity or trusted-introducer decision would attribute the attacker's assertion to the offline primary key. The same held for a legacy RSA subkey bound only for encryption, whose algorithm is nonetheless able to sign. This does not forge the primary key's signature or recover any private key; it promotes an already-compromised restricted subkey to the primary key's identity-issuing authority, defeating the containment the key-flag separation provides. A third-party certification or delegation is now attributed to the issuing certificate only when the component key that made it is the primary key, or is a subkey holding CERTIFY_OTHER when the signature was created, so certification-capable subkeys continue to be accepted; primary keys are accepted whatever their key flags say, since a primary key is certification-capable by construction and certificates carrying no key flags subpacket at all are common. Third-party revocations are deliberately outside the rule, since declining to honour one would keep trust alive rather than withdraw it.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 3, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Formbricks before 5.4.4 and 6 before 6.0.1 allows stored XSS. The survey-level Custom Head Scripts feature did not enforce the documented Manage permission boundary. A workspace member holding only readWrite permission c...Show more
Formbricks before 5.4.4 and 6 before 6.0.1 allows stored XSS. The survey-level Custom Head Scripts feature did not enforce the documented Manage permission boundary. A workspace member holding only readWrite permission could configure Custom Head Scripts on a survey, an operation the documentation restricts to the Manage role. Because the configured scripts execute in the authenticated browser session of any user who opens the affected survey, a lower-privileged member can run arbitrary JavaScript (stored cross-site scripting) in the session of higher-privileged users. Fixed versions require Manage access to modify survey Custom Head Scripts.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 2, 2026
7.6 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. From 0.1.45 until 0.4.4, the langgraph-sdk resource-scoped authorization deco...Show more
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. From 0.1.45 until 0.4.4, the langgraph-sdk resource-scoped authorization decorators @auth.on.threads, @auth.on.assistants, and @auth.on.crons ignore the actions argument and register the selected handler for every action on the resource. Because that wildcard resource handler is selected before broader fallback handlers, an authenticated user may bypass fallback action, ownership, or permission checks and read, update, or delete another user's resource. Only Python deployments using actions on the affected decorators are vulnerable, and a deployment remains protected when the selected handler independently enforces all required checks for every action it receives. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.4.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Oct 5, 2026
Oct 2, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted...Show more
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)Show less
-
-
Oct 2, 2026
Oct 2, 2026
7.2 HIGH· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an empty-filter scope bypass in the triples delete API that allows any authenticated user to delete or forge arbitrary semantic triples regardless of ownership. Attackers can send an empty f...Show more
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an empty-filter scope bypass in the triples delete API that allows any authenticated user to delete or forge arbitrary semantic triples regardless of ownership. Attackers can send an empty filter to the triples delete endpoint to remove the admins-group membership triple, emptying the admin group and causing a site-wide authorization lockout.Show less
-
-
Oct 2, 2026
Oct 2, 2026
9.4 CRITICAL· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Discord libdave before 1.2.0 did not reject an MLS Welcome message when the resulting group roster contained an unrecognized participant. An attacker in control of the DAVE signaling path (the voice gateway, or an equiva...Show more
Discord libdave before 1.2.0 did not reject an MLS Welcome message when the resulting group roster contained an unrecognized participant. An attacker in control of the DAVE signaling path (the voice gateway, or an equivalent position able to add, alter, or withhold signaling messages to a client) could cause affected clients to accept an unauthorized member into the end-to-end encrypted media session, compromising the confidentiality and integrity of audio and video.Show less
-
-
Oct 2, 2026
Oct 2, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A security flaw has been discovered in calcom cal.diy up to 6.2.0. This affects the function doesUserIdHaveAccessToBooking of the file BookingAccessService.ts of the component PBAC Permission Engine. Performing a manipul...Show more
A security flaw has been discovered in calcom cal.diy up to 6.2.0. This affects the function doesUserIdHaveAccessToBooking of the file BookingAccessService.ts of the component PBAC Permission Engine. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.Show less
-
-
Oct 7, 2026
Oct 1, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
RT-Labs AB C-Open CANopen contains a write protection bypass in the SDO (Service Data Object) server implementation 'src/co_sdo_server.c' that fails to properly validate write permissions when processing download-segment...Show more
RT-Labs AB C-Open CANopen contains a write protection bypass in the SDO (Service Data Object) server implementation 'src/co_sdo_server.c' that fails to properly validate write permissions when processing download-segment frames. An unauthenticated attacker on the CAN bus can initiate an SDO upload for a read-only Object Dictionary (OD) entry, which sets a data pointer to the read-only object, then send download-segment frames to write to that memory location. The download-segment handler does not verify that a download session is active, allowing any CANopen node to overwrite read-only OD entries using two SDO frames. Note that CANopen protocol operates over CAN bus and does not provide built-in authentication mechanisms. Fixed in 1.1.1.Show less
-
-
Oct 1, 2026
Oct 1, 2026
8.6 HIGH· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Obot 0.21.1 through 0.24.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to reach MCP servers because the checkUI deny list omits the /mcp-connect-composite/ route. Basic-role users with...Show more
Obot 0.21.1 through 0.24.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to reach MCP servers because the checkUI deny list omits the /mcp-connect-composite/ route. Basic-role users with a composite MCP ID can proxy requests through mcpGateway.Proxy to invoke tools on MCP servers restricted by Access Control Rules.Show less
-
-
Oct 1, 2026
Oct 1, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Ghost versions from 5.125.1 before 6.57.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the Admin Feedback endpoint that allows unauthorized staff users to access member data. Attackers with staff privileges can que...Show more
Ghost versions from 5.125.1 before 6.57.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the Admin Feedback endpoint that allows unauthorized staff users to access member data. Attackers with staff privileges can query the feedback endpoint to retrieve sensitive member information without proper authorization checks.Show less
-
-
Oct 1, 2026
Oct 1, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Ghost versions 4.3.0 before 6.58.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where lower-privilege staff users can use staff tokens to bypass post editing restrictions. Attackers with staff credentials can leverage...Show more
Ghost versions 4.3.0 before 6.58.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where lower-privilege staff users can use staff tokens to bypass post editing restrictions. Attackers with staff credentials can leverage tokens to edit posts beyond their assigned privilege level.Show less
-
-
Oct 6, 2026
Oct 1, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Ghost versions from 4.0.0 before 6.63.0 contain a content API vulnerability that allows unauthenticated visitors to access gated post content. Attackers can bypass content restrictions by directly querying the content AP...Show more
Ghost versions from 4.0.0 before 6.63.0 contain a content API vulnerability that allows unauthenticated visitors to access gated post content. Attackers can bypass content restrictions by directly querying the content API to retrieve restricted posts without authentication.Show less