← Back
CWE-863

3,038 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (3,038)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Shareaholic
1Shareaholic
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 25, 2022
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Professional Social Sharing Buttons, Icons & Related Posts WordPress plugin before 9.7.6 does not have proper authorisation check in one of the AJAX action, available to unauthenticated (in v < 9.7.5) and author+ (in...Show more
The Professional Social Sharing Buttons, Icons & Related Posts WordPress plugin before 9.7.6 does not have proper authorisation check in one of the AJAX action, available to unauthenticated (in v < 9.7.5) and author+ (in v9.7.5) users, allowing them to call it and retrieve various information such as the list of active plugins, various version like PHP, cURL, WP etc.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 23, 2022
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in Virtual Keyboard in Google Chrome on Chrome OS prior to 100.0.4896.60 allowed a local attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via physical access to the device.
1Zulip
1Zulip
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 22, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Zulip is an open source team chat tool. Due to an incorrect authorization check in Zulip Server 5.4 and earlier, a member of an organization could craft an API call that grants organization administrator privileges to on...Show more
Zulip is an open source team chat tool. Due to an incorrect authorization check in Zulip Server 5.4 and earlier, a member of an organization could craft an API call that grants organization administrator privileges to one of their bots. The vulnerability is fixed in Zulip Server 5.5. Members who don’t own any bots, and lack permission to create them, can’t exploit the vulnerability. As a workaround for the vulnerability, an organization administrator can restrict the `Who can create bots` permission to administrators only, and change the ownership of existing bots.Show less
1Wavlink
1Wn533a8 Firmware
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 20, 2022
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An access control issue in Wavlink WN533A8 M33A8.V5030.190716 allows attackers to obtain usernames and passwords via view-source:http://IP_ADDRESS/sysinit.shtml?r=52300 and searching for [logincheck(user);].
1Poly
1Eagleeye Director Ii Firmware
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 17, 2022
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Poly EagleEye Director II before 2.2.2.1. Existence of a certain file (which can be created via an rsync backdoor) causes all API calls to execute as admin without authentication.
1Inductiveautomation
1Ignition
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 16, 2022
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Inductive Automation Ignition before 7.9.20 and 8.x before 8.1.17. The ScriptInvoke function allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by supplying a Python script.
1Inductiveautomation
1Ignition
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 15, 2022
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Inductive Automation Ignition before 7.9.20 and 8.x before 8.1.17. Designer and Vision Client Session IDs are mishandled. An attacker can determine which session IDs were generated in the past...Show more
An issue was discovered in Inductive Automation Ignition before 7.9.20 and 8.x before 8.1.17. Designer and Vision Client Session IDs are mishandled. An attacker can determine which session IDs were generated in the past and then hijack sessions assigned to these IDs via Randy.Show less
1Openzeppelin
1Contracts
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 15, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. Version 0.2.0 is vulnerable to an error that renders account contracts unusable on live net...Show more
OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. Version 0.2.0 is vulnerable to an error that renders account contracts unusable on live networks. This issue affects all accounts (vanilla and ethereum flavors) in the v0.2.0 release of OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo, which are not whitelisted on StarkNet mainnet. Only goerli deployments of v0.2.0 accounts are affected. This faulty behavior is not observed in StarkNet's testing framework. This bug has been patched in v0.2.1.Show less
2Grafana
Netapp
2E Series Performance Analyzer
Grafana
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 15, 2022
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. In versions 5.3 until 9.0.3, 8.5.9, 8.4.10, and 8.3.10, it is possible for a malicious user who has authorization to log into a Grafana instance via a...Show more
Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. In versions 5.3 until 9.0.3, 8.5.9, 8.4.10, and 8.3.10, it is possible for a malicious user who has authorization to log into a Grafana instance via a configured OAuth IdP which provides a login name to take over the account of another user in that Grafana instance. This can occur when the malicious user is authorized to log in to Grafana via OAuth, the malicious user's external user id is not already associated with an account in Grafana, the malicious user's email address is not already associated with an account in Grafana, and the malicious user knows the Grafana username of the target user. If these conditions are met, the malicious user can set their username in the OAuth provider to that of the target user, then go through the OAuth flow to log in to Grafana. Due to the way that external and internal user accounts are linked together during login, if the conditions above are all met then the malicious user will be able to log in to the target user's Grafana account. Versions 9.0.3, 8.5.9, 8.4.10, and 8.3.10 contain a patch for this issue. As a workaround, concerned users can disable OAuth login to their Grafana instance, or ensure that all users authorized to log in via OAuth have a corresponding user account in Grafana linked to their email address.Show less
1Mattermost
1Mattermost
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 14, 2022
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
The Guest account feature in Mattermost version 6.7.0 and earlier fails to properly restrict the permissions, which allows a guest user to fetch a list of all public channels in the team, in spite of not being part of th...Show more
The Guest account feature in Mattermost version 6.7.0 and earlier fails to properly restrict the permissions, which allows a guest user to fetch a list of all public channels in the team, in spite of not being part of those channels.Show less
1Microsoft
10Windows 10
Windows 11Windows 7+7 more
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 12, 2022
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
1Sap
1Businessobjects Business Intelligence Platform
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 12, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
Under certain conditions SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform 4.x - versions 420,430 allows user Administrator to view, edit or modify rights of objects it doesn't own and which would otherwise be restricte...Show more
Under certain conditions SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform 4.x - versions 420,430 allows user Administrator to view, edit or modify rights of objects it doesn't own and which would otherwise be restricted.Show less
1Unsafe Accessor Project
1Unsafe Accessor
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 11, 2022
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
UnsafeAccessor (UA) is a bridge to access jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe & sun.misc.Unsafe. Normally, if UA is loaded as a named module, the internal data of UA is protected by JVM and others can only access UA via UA's standa...Show more
UnsafeAccessor (UA) is a bridge to access jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe & sun.misc.Unsafe. Normally, if UA is loaded as a named module, the internal data of UA is protected by JVM and others can only access UA via UA's standard API. The main application can set up `SecurityCheck.AccessLimiter` for UA to limit access to UA. Starting with version 1.4.0 and prior to version 1.7.0, when `SecurityCheck.AccessLimiter` is set up, untrusted code can access UA without limitation, even when UA is loaded as a named module. This issue does not affect those for whom `SecurityCheck.AccessLimiter` is not set up. Version 1.7.0 contains a patch.Show less
1Zimbra
1Collaboration
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 11, 2022
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Zimbra Collaboration Open Source 8.8.15 does not encrypt the initial-login randomly created password (from the "zmprove ca" command). It is visible in cleartext on port UDP 514 (aka the syslog port). NOTE: a third party...Show more
Zimbra Collaboration Open Source 8.8.15 does not encrypt the initial-login randomly created password (from the "zmprove ca" command). It is visible in cleartext on port UDP 514 (aka the syslog port). NOTE: a third party reports that this cannot be reproduced.Show less
1Northern.tech
1Mender
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 6, 2022
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
3.3 LOW· v2
The client in Northern.tech Mender 3.2.0, 3.2.1, and 3.2.2 has Incorrect Access Control. It listens on a random, unprivileged TCP port and exposes an HTTP proxy to facilitate API calls from additional client components r...Show more
The client in Northern.tech Mender 3.2.0, 3.2.1, and 3.2.2 has Incorrect Access Control. It listens on a random, unprivileged TCP port and exposes an HTTP proxy to facilitate API calls from additional client components running on the device. However, it listens on all network interfaces instead of only the localhost interface. Therefore, any client on the same network can connect to this TCP port and send HTTP requests. The Mender Client will forward these requests to the Mender Server. Additionally, if mTLS is set up, the Mender Client will connect to the Mender Server using the device's client certificate, making it possible for the attacker to bypass mTLS authentication and send requests to the Mender Server without direct access to the client certificate and related private key. Accessing the HTTP proxy from the local network doesn't represent a direct threat, because it doesn't expose any device or server-specific data. However, it increases the attack surface and can be a potential vector to exploit other vulnerabilities both on the Client and the Server.Show less
1Ingredient Stock Management System Project
1Ingredient Stock Management System
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 5, 2022
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
An access control issue in Ingredient Stock Management System v1.0 allows attackers to take over user accounts via a crafted POST request to /isms/classes/Users.php.
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 1, 2022
N/A· v4
2.7 LOW· v3
3.5 LOW· v2
An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 12.2 prior to 14.10.5, 15.0 prior to 15.0.4, and 15.1 prior to 15.1.1. In GitLab, if a group enables the setting to restrict access to users...Show more
An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 12.2 prior to 14.10.5, 15.0 prior to 15.0.4, and 15.1 prior to 15.1.1. In GitLab, if a group enables the setting to restrict access to users belonging to specific domains, that allow-list may be bypassed if a Maintainer uses the 'Invite a group' feature to invite a group that has members that don't comply with domain allow-list.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 1, 2022
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Incorrect authorization in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 10.7 prior to 14.10.5, 15.0 prior to 15.0.4, and 15.1 prior to 15.1.1, allowed an attacker already in possession of a valid Deploy Key or a Deploy Token to...Show more
Incorrect authorization in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 10.7 prior to 14.10.5, 15.0 prior to 15.0.4, and 15.1 prior to 15.1.1, allowed an attacker already in possession of a valid Deploy Key or a Deploy Token to misuse it from any location to access Container Registries even when IP address restrictions were configured.Show less
1Jenkins
1Request Rename Or Delete
Nov 21, 2024
Jun 30, 2022
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Jenkins Request Rename Or Delete Plugin 1.1.0 and earlier does not correctly perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to view an administrative configuration page li...Show more
Jenkins Request Rename Or Delete Plugin 1.1.0 and earlier does not correctly perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to view an administrative configuration page listing pending requests.Show less
1Jenkins
1Build Metrics
Nov 21, 2024
Jun 30, 2022
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Jenkins build-metrics Plugin 1.3 and earlier does not perform permission checks in multiple HTTP endpoints, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to obtain information about jobs otherwise inaccessible to them.