Incorrect Authorization

Mattermost versions 10.1.x <= 10.1.3, 10.4.x <= 10.4.1, 9.11.x <= 9.11.7, 10.3.x <= 10.3.2, 10.2.x <= 10.2.2 fail to restrict channel export of archived channels when the "Allow users to view archived channels" is disabled which allows a user to export channel contents when they shouldn't have access to itShow less

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. (CWE-863)     Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, have modules enabled by default that allow execution of system level processes.   When access control checks are incorrectly applied, users can access data or perform actions that they should not be allowed to perform. This can lead to a wide range of problems, including information exposures and denial of service.Show less

Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. In affected versions if there are two overlapping policies for the `update` action that allow access to different fields, instead of correctly checking access permissions against the item they apply for the user is allowed to update the superset of fields allowed by any of the policies. E.g. have one policy allowing update access to `field_a` if the `id == 1` and one policy allowing update access to `field_b` if the `id == 2`. The user with both these policies is allowed to update both `field_a` and `field_b` for the items with ids `1` and `2`. Before v11, if a user was allowed to update an item they were allowed to update the fields that the single permission, that applied to that item, listed. With overlapping permissions this isn't as clear cut anymore and the union of fields might not be the fields the user is allowed to update for that specific item. The solution that this PR introduces is to evaluate the permissions for each field that the user tries to update in the validateItemAccess DB query, instead of only verifying access to the item as a whole. This is done by, instead of returning the actual field value, returning a flag that indicates if the user has access to that field. This uses the same case/when mechanism that is used for stripping out non permitted field that is at the core of the permissions engine. As a result, for every item that the access is validated for, the expected result is an item that has either 1 or null for all the "requested" fields instead of any of the actual field values. These results are not useful for anything other than verifying the field level access permissions. The final check in validateItemAccess can either fail if the number of items does not match the number of items the access is checked for (ie. the user does not have access to the item at all) or if not all of the passed in fields have access permissions for any of the returned items. This is a vulnerability that allows update access to unintended fields, potentially impacting the password field for user accounts. This has been addressed in version 11.1.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.Show less

Insecure Permissions in Atos Eviden IDRA and IDCA before 2.7.0. A highly trusted role (Config Admin) could exceed their configuration privileges in a multi-partition environment and access some confidential data. Data integrity and availability is not at risk.Show less

Systems running the Instaclustr fork of Stratio's Cassandra-Lucene-Index plugin versions 4.0-rc1-1.0.0 through 4.0.16-1.0.0 and 4.1.2-1.0.0 through 4.1.8-1.0.0, installed into Apache Cassandra version 4.x, are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow authenticated Cassandra users to remotely bypass RBAC and escalate their privileges.Show less

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in pihome-shc PiHome 2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /user_accounts.php?uid of the component Role-Based Access Control. The manipulation leads to missing authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.Show less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11, 2.4.8-beta1 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to view or modify select information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.Show less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11, 2.4.8-beta1 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to view select information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.Show less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high.Show less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read select data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interactionShow less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to modify select data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.Show less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to modify select data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.Show less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access, leading to both a High impact to confidentiality and Low impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.Show less

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform actions with permissions that were not granted leading to both a High impact to confidentiality and Low impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.Show less