← Back
CWE-863

3,046 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (3,046)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Devolutions
1Remote Desktop Manager
Mar 28, 2025
Nov 25, 2024
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Incorrect authorization in the permission validation component of Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2024.2.21 and earlier on Windows allows a malicious authenticated user to bypass the "View Password" permission via spe...Show more
Incorrect authorization in the permission validation component of Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2024.2.21 and earlier on Windows allows a malicious authenticated user to bypass the "View Password" permission via specific actions.Show less
-
-
Feb 23, 2026
Nov 20, 2024
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Improper access control vulnerability in M-Files Aino in versions before 24.10 allowed an authenticated user to access object information via incorrect evaluation of effective permissions.
1Google
1Android
Dec 18, 2024
Nov 19, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In restorePermissionState of PermissionManagerServiceImpl.java, there is a possible way for an app to keep permissions that should be revoked due to incorrect permission flags cleared during an update. This could lead to...Show more
In restorePermissionState of PermissionManagerServiceImpl.java, there is a possible way for an app to keep permissions that should be revoked due to incorrect permission flags cleared during an update. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Oracle
1Agile Product Lifecycle Management
Oct 27, 2025
Nov 18, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM Framework product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Software Development Kit, Process Extension). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability...Show more
Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM Framework product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Software Development Kit, Process Extension). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM Framework. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM Framework accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).Show less
1Autolabproject
1Autolab
Jan 21, 2025
Nov 18, 2024
4.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Autolab is a course management service that enables auto-graded programming assignments. There is a vulnerability in version 3.0.1 where CAs can view or edit the grade for any submission ID, even if they are not a CA for...Show more
Autolab is a course management service that enables auto-graded programming assignments. There is a vulnerability in version 3.0.1 where CAs can view or edit the grade for any submission ID, even if they are not a CA for the class that has the submission. The endpoints only check that the CAs have the authorization level of a CA in the class in the endpoint, which is not necessarily the class the submission is attached to. Version 3.0.2 contains a patch. No known workarounds are available.Show less
1Moodle
1Moodle
Nov 20, 2024
Nov 18, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability was found in Moodle. Additional checks are required to ensure users can only access the schedule of a report if they have permission to edit that report.
1Moodle
1Moodle
Nov 20, 2024
Nov 18, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability was found in Moodle. Additional checks are required to ensure users can only edit or delete RSS feeds that they have permission to modify.
1Nextcloud
1Nextcloud Server
Jan 23, 2025
Nov 15, 2024
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Nextcloud Server is a self hosted personal cloud system. After an attacker got access to the session of a user or administrator, the attacker would be able to create, change or delete external storages without having to...Show more
Nextcloud Server is a self hosted personal cloud system. After an attacker got access to the session of a user or administrator, the attacker would be able to create, change or delete external storages without having to confirm the password. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 28.0.12, 29.0.9 or 30.0.2.Show less
1Timgreen
1Python Book
Jun 17, 2025
Nov 15, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
python_book V1.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information of users with different IDs by modifying the ID parameter.
-
-
Dec 3, 2024
Nov 15, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The python_food ordering system V1.0 has an unauthorized vulnerability that leads to the leakage of sensitive user information. Attackers can access it through https://ip:port/api/myapp/index/user/info?id=1 And modify th...Show more
The python_food ordering system V1.0 has an unauthorized vulnerability that leads to the leakage of sensitive user information. Attackers can access it through https://ip:port/api/myapp/index/user/info?id=1 And modify the ID value to obtain sensitive user information beyond authorization.Show less
-
-
Dec 3, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A misconfiguration in the fingerprint authentication mechanism of Binance: BTC, Crypto and NFTS v2.85.4, allows attackers to bypass authentication when adding a new fingerprint.
1Lunary
1Lunary
Nov 18, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In lunary-ai/lunary versions 1.2.2 through 1.2.6, an incorrect authorization vulnerability allows unprivileged users to re-generate the private key for projects they do not have access to. Specifically, a user with a 'Me...Show more
In lunary-ai/lunary versions 1.2.2 through 1.2.6, an incorrect authorization vulnerability allows unprivileged users to re-generate the private key for projects they do not have access to. Specifically, a user with a 'Member' role can issue a request to regenerate the private key of a project without having the necessary permissions or being assigned to that project. This issue was fixed in version 1.2.7.Show less
1Linuxfoundation
1Harbor
Nov 19, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Harbor fails to validate user permissions when reading and updating job execution logs through the P2P preheat execution logs. By sending a request that attempts to read/update P2P preheat execution logs and specifying d...Show more
Harbor fails to validate user permissions when reading and updating job execution logs through the P2P preheat execution logs. By sending a request that attempts to read/update P2P preheat execution logs and specifying different job IDs, malicious authenticated users could read all the job logs stored in the Harbor database.Show less
1Linuxfoundation
1Harbor
Nov 19, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag retention policies.  By sending a request to update a tag retention policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn...Show more
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag retention policies.  By sending a request to update a tag retention policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify tag retention policies configured in other projects.Show less
1Linuxfoundation
1Harbor
Nov 19, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag immutability policies.  By sending a request to update a tag immutability policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user...Show more
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag immutability policies.  By sending a request to update a tag immutability policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify tag immutability policies configured in other projects.Show less
1Linuxfoundation
1Harbor
Nov 19, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating p2p preheat policies. By sending a request to update a p2p preheat policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn't hav...Show more
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating p2p preheat policies. By sending a request to update a p2p preheat policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn't have access to, the attacker could modify p2p preheat policies configured in other projects.Show less
1Linuxfoundation
1Harbor
Nov 19, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating a robot account that belongs to a project that the authenticated user doesn’t have access to.  By sending a request that attempts to update a robot account, an...Show more
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating a robot account that belongs to a project that the authenticated user doesn’t have access to.  By sending a request that attempts to update a robot account, and specifying a robot account id and robot account name that belongs to a different project that the user doesn’t have access to, it was possible to revoke the robot account permissions.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Nov 26, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 16.0 prior to 17.3.7, starting from 17.4 prior to 17.4.4, and starting from 17.5 prior to 17.5.2, which could have allowed unauthorized access...Show more
An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 16.0 prior to 17.3.7, starting from 17.4 prior to 17.4.4, and starting from 17.5 prior to 17.5.2, which could have allowed unauthorized access to the Kubernetes agent in a cluster under specific configurations.Show less
-
-
Nov 26, 2024
Nov 13, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
baltic-it TOPqw Webportal v1.35.283.2 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control in the User Management function in /Apps/TOPqw/BenutzerManagement.aspx. This allows a low privileged user to access all modules in the web p...Show more
baltic-it TOPqw Webportal v1.35.283.2 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control in the User Management function in /Apps/TOPqw/BenutzerManagement.aspx. This allows a low privileged user to access all modules in the web portal, view and manipulate information and permissions of other users, lock other user or unlock the own account, change the password of other users, create new users or delete existing users and view, manipulate and delete reference data.Show less
1Viwis
1Learning Management System
Jan 8, 2025
Nov 13, 2024
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was found in VIWIS LMS 9.11. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component Print Handler. The manipulation leads to missing authorization. It is possible to launch t...Show more
A vulnerability was found in VIWIS LMS 9.11. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component Print Handler. The manipulation leads to missing authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. A user with the role learner can use the administrative print function with an active session before and after an exam slot to access the entire exam including solutions in the web application. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.Show less