← Back
CWE-863

3,773 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (3,773)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
7.2 HIGH· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
knowns versions before 0.30.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where mutating code actions are incorrectly classified as read-only operations. Attackers with read-restricted sessions can exploit code.replace...Show more
knowns versions before 0.30.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where mutating code actions are incorrectly classified as read-only operations. Attackers with read-restricted sessions can exploit code.replace to modify permission configurations and escalate privileges on subsequent calls.Show less
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
8.6 HIGH· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Lara Dashboard before 1.3.2 authorizes the POST /admin/settings/core-upgrades/upload endpoint with only the settings.edit permission, allowing non-Superadmin administrators to upload and extract arbitrary zip archives ov...Show more
Lara Dashboard before 1.3.2 authorizes the POST /admin/settings/core-upgrades/upload endpoint with only the settings.edit permission, allowing non-Superadmin administrators to upload and extract arbitrary zip archives over the live application source code. Attackers can upload a malicious archive containing modified application files such as routes/web.php with embedded system commands, which execute as the web server user with access to environment secrets and database credentials.Show less
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.3.160480, 2026.1.14047 pUT requests on link sub-resources allowed modification linked entities without update permission
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 improper permission checks allowed read-only users to create and modify whiteboard cards
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 improper permission checks allowed overwriting of bundled apps via the app import endpoint
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
N/A· v4
3.1 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 a crafted WebSocket message allowed read-only whiteboard users to modify canvas content
-
-
Sep 8, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The SELFDN ACI bind-rule evaluator incorrectly matches an anonymous LDAP client's empty bind DN against an empty stored attribute value, allowing an unauthenticated client to sat...Show more
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The SELFDN ACI bind-rule evaluator incorrectly matches an anonymous LDAP client's empty bind DN against an empty stored attribute value, allowing an unauthenticated client to satisfy access control checks intended to require a matching authenticated identity. This can allow an anonymous LDAP client to perform an operation, such as adding or modifying a directory entry, that a SELFDN-based ACI intended to restrict to a specific authenticated user.Show less
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
8.3 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
In Eclipse Ankaios versions v0.5.1 through v1.0.1, the agent-side Control Interface authorizer incorrectly evaluates multi-segment allow rules whose first path segment is a wildcard. An authenticated workload with access...Show more
In Eclipse Ankaios versions v0.5.1 through v1.0.1, the agent-side Control Interface authorizer incorrectly evaluates multi-segment allow rules whose first path segment is a wildcard. An authenticated workload with access restricted by such a rule can submit a CompleteStateRequest or UpdateStateRequest with an empty field mask. The request may then be incorrectly authorized as matching the scoped rule, allowing the workload to read the complete cluster state or replace state outside its authorized subtree. This may result in unauthorized disclosure or modification of other workloads and cluster configuration. Only a rule consisting solely of * is intended to authorize an empty mask. Mitigation: Until an update containing the fix is installed, avoid multi-segment Control Interface allow-rule filter masks that begin with a wildcard, such as *.workloads.some_workload. Replace them with explicit paths such as desiredState.workloads.some_workload, where applicable. A filter mask consisting solely of * has different, intentionally unrestricted semantics and should only be used when full-state access is intended.Show less
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
5.5 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A security vulnerability has been detected in projeto-siga siga up to 11.0.2.10/11.0.2.13/11.1.1. This affects the function ExAutenticacaoController.autenticar of the file sigaex/src/main/java/br/gov/jfrj/siga/vraptor/Ex...Show more
A security vulnerability has been detected in projeto-siga siga up to 11.0.2.10/11.0.2.13/11.1.1. This affects the function ExAutenticacaoController.autenticar of the file sigaex/src/main/java/br/gov/jfrj/siga/vraptor/ExAutenticacaoController.java of the component Authentication Flow. Such manipulation of the argument cod/jwt leads to missing authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.Show less
-
-
Sep 7, 2026
Sep 7, 2026
2.0 LOW· v4
4.7 MEDIUM· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was found in FluentCMS up to 0.0.5. This affects the function GetAccessible of the file src/Backend/FluentCMS.Services/Permissions/PermissionManager.cs. Performing a manipulation results in missing author...Show more
A vulnerability was found in FluentCMS up to 0.0.5. This affects the function GetAccessible of the file src/Backend/FluentCMS.Services/Permissions/PermissionManager.cs. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.Show less
-
-
Sep 5, 2026
Sep 5, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
grav-plugin-api before 1.0.20 fails to validate group-inherited super permissions in user-management guards, allowing non-super user managers to modify super-admin accounts. Attackers with api.access and api.users.write...Show more
grav-plugin-api before 1.0.20 fails to validate group-inherited super permissions in user-management guards, allowing non-super user managers to modify super-admin accounts. Attackers with api.access and api.users.write can patch password fields on group-super accounts to gain full administrative control.Show less
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Avo is a framework to create admin panels for Ruby on Rails apps. From version 2.28.0 to before version 3.32.0, Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks server-side upload authorization and bypasses the documented f...Show more
Avo is a framework to create admin panels for Ruby on Rails apps. From version 2.28.0 to before version 3.32.0, Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks server-side upload authorization and bypasses the documented field-level upload policy methods such as upload_{FIELD_ID}?. An authenticated Avo user who can reach the Avo attachment upload endpoint can replace or add attachment content, including binary content, filename, and content-type metadata, on a resolved record even when both update? and upload_<field>? policies deny the operation. This primarily affects multi-role Avo Pro/Advanced-style deployments where non-administrator or restricted operator users can reach Avo and per-record or per-field operations are expected to be enforced by policies. This issue has been patched in version 3.32.0.Show less
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, and 7.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify certain system messages due to improper authorization.
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Observability with Instana (Agent) Build 1.0.303 through 1.0.323 IBM Instana Agent Operator could allow an authenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by missing destination namespace valida...Show more
IBM Observability with Instana (Agent) Build 1.0.303 through 1.0.323 IBM Instana Agent Operator could allow an authenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by missing destination namespace validation when copying etcd mTLS client credentials from the openshift-etcd system namespace into an attacker-controlled namespace.Show less
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Documenso 2.17.0 contains an access control vulnerability in the PDF-serving endpoint that fails to validate document visibility settings. Attackers with low privileges can read restricted documents within their team or...Show more
Documenso 2.17.0 contains an access control vulnerability in the PDF-serving endpoint that fails to validate document visibility settings. Attackers with low privileges can read restricted documents within their team or cross-tenant by leveraging missing ownership validation on document data identifiers.Show less
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
6.0 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
AppFlowy-Cloud through 0.9.64 fails to validate workspace membership when establishing WebSocket connections in the establish_ws_connection_v2 handler, allowing authenticated users to bind sessions to workspaces they do...Show more
AppFlowy-Cloud through 0.9.64 fails to validate workspace membership when establishing WebSocket connections in the establish_ws_connection_v2 handler, allowing authenticated users to bind sessions to workspaces they do not belong to. Attackers can send sync Manifest messages with victim object identifiers to read full document or database state from collaborations in other workspaces without victim involvement.Show less
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
9.2 CRITICAL· v4
8.6 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Postgres MCP Pro 0.3.0 contains a restricted-mode bypass vulnerability where function-name validation is not applied to RangeFunction nodes in FROM clauses. Attackers can execute file-reading functions like pg_read_file...Show more
Postgres MCP Pro 0.3.0 contains a restricted-mode bypass vulnerability where function-name validation is not applied to RangeFunction nodes in FROM clauses. Attackers can execute file-reading functions like pg_read_file through FROM-clause syntax to read arbitrary files despite restricted-mode protections.Show less
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
7.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
AppFlowy-Cloud 0.9.64 fails to verify that requested collab objects belong to the workspace in authorization checks, allowing attackers to access documents and database rows across workspaces. Attackers can supply a vict...Show more
AppFlowy-Cloud 0.9.64 fails to verify that requested collab objects belong to the workspace in authorization checks, allowing attackers to access documents and database rows across workspaces. Attackers can supply a victim's object ID with their own workspace ID to bypass access controls and read, modify, or delete cross-workspace data.Show less
-
-
Sep 5, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
8.2 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Traefik before v2.11.55 and v3.0.0 through v3.7.10 contain a TLS option conflict resolution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass client-certificate authentication by creating conflicting TLS opti...Show more
Traefik before v2.11.55 and v3.0.0 through v3.7.10 contain a TLS option conflict resolution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass client-certificate authentication by creating conflicting TLS options on multi-host routers. Attackers can reach protected backends by exploiting shared TLS resolution across multiple hostnames in a single router rule, causing the strict mTLS requirement to fall back to default options for all hosts.Show less
-
-
Sep 4, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
3.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.8 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the question creation endpoint where the isAddingQuestionsAllowed() method grants access to all callers when main.enableAskQuestions is enabled, ign...Show more
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.8 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the question creation endpoint where the isAddingQuestionsAllowed() method grants access to all callers when main.enableAskQuestions is enabled, ignoring the records.allowQuestionsForGuests setting. Unauthenticated attackers can submit questions via the question/create API endpoint to bypass guest submission restrictions and inject spam into the admin moderation queue.Show less