Missing Authorization

Missing authorization in BFCache in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less

Missing authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted PDF file. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less

Missing authorization in BrowserTag in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less

An authorization weakness in JFrog Artifactory Composer repository handling may allow an authenticated user, under specific conditions, to read package metadata from repositories they are not authorized to read. The issue affects confidentiality and has been addressed in fixed Artifactory versions.Show less

An authenticated user may initiate repository migration operations without required repository permissions, potentially causing information disclosure, unauthorized state changes, and service disruption. Fixed versions address the issue.Show less

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonai 4.6.58, praisonai serve agents and praisonai serve unified parse --api-key but _create_agents_app() and _create_unified_app() do not install a credential check. Unauthenticated callers can reach POST /agents and POST /api/v1/agents/{id}/invoke. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.58.Show less

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonaiagents 1.6.58, ast_grep_rewrite lacks the @require_approval decorator used by sibling mutation tools. With dry_run=False, an agent-controlled call can pass --update-all and a broad path to rewrite matching files without the expected authorization gate. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.58.Show less

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonaiagents 1.6.58, AgentServer exposes ServerConfig.auth_token but AgentServer._create_app does not check it on any route. A remote caller can subscribe, publish, and perform other actions without a valid bearer token or X-Auth-Token even when authentication is configured. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.58.Show less

Ech0 before 4.4.3 fails to enforce scope-based authorization on nine comment panel admin endpoints, allowing access tokens with minimal scopes to perform full comment moderation operations. Attackers with a limited-scope access token can list, approve, reject, delete comments, and modify comment system settings by directly accessing the unprotected panel endpoints.Show less

Ech0 before 4.4.3 lacks authorization checks on system log endpoints allowing any authenticated non-admin user to read and stream all server logs. Attackers can access historical logs and real-time log streams via GET /api/system/logs, GET /api/system/logs/stream, and WS /ws/system/logs to gather reconnaissance data including internal file paths, error stack traces, and application state.Show less

Ech0 before 4.4.3 fails to enforce administrator authorization on dashboard log endpoints, allowing any authenticated user to access system logs. Attackers with valid user sessions can query GET /api/system/logs and subscribe to SSE and WebSocket log streams to retrieve sensitive operational data including file paths, stack traces, and internal URLs.Show less

Ech0 before 4.5.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability where session tokens skip scope validation in RequireScopes middleware, allowing logged-in non-admin users to access admin endpoints. Attackers can read system logs, visitor statistics, user emails, and subscribe to live WebSocket logs by sending authenticated session tokens to unprotected endpoints.Show less

The Newsletters plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 4.17. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to send arbitrary newsletter emails to users of any WordPress role, including administrators, by forging POST fields during a normal post submission. This allows an attacker-supplied role slug via the newsletters_mailinglistsroles POST field to be passed directly to get_users(), enabling unauthorized mass-mailing and potential phishing against privileged site users through the site's own outbound email channel.Show less

The My Agile Privacy® – CMP, Cookie Consent & Privacy Tools plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.6. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings including missing_cookie_shield, cookie_shield_running, cmode_v2_js_on_error, cmode_v2_js_error_code, and cmode_v2_js_error_motivation stored in the plugin's settings key.Show less

A flaw was found in the JWT Bearer authorization grant implementation within the keycloak-services component of Red Hat Build of Keycloak. This component handles various OAuth2 and OpenID Connect grant types used for issuing access tokens. The issue occurs because the JWT Bearer grant fails to check if a client requires user consent before issuing a token. This allows an authenticated attacker with valid client credentials and a trusted identity provider assertion to bypass the consent requirement and obtain unauthorized access to a user account at a consent-gated client.Show less

The extension's invitation controller fails to stop processing after redirecting on invalid input (missing hash, non-existent, disabled, or deleted users), allowing an unauthenticated attacker to set a new password for and re-enable an arbitrary existing frontend user account. This vulnerability is only present in the 8.x versions of the extension.Show less

The frontend topic editing flow does not verify on the server side that the requesting visitor owns the topic being modified. As a result, a visitor who knows the identifier of a topic from the public forum can submit a modified update request for that topic directly and overwrite its content, without the application confirming ownership. Topic identifiers are visible in the public forum listing, and exploitation requires no privileged access or non-default configuration.Show less

The frontend company self-service editing feature relies on a template-level visibility flag to hide the edit form for company records a visitor does not own, but the corresponding write operation does not repeat this ownership check on the server side. As a result, a visitor who knows the identifier of a company record from the public directory can submit a modified update request for that record directly and overwrite its data, without the application ever confirming that the visitor owns it.Show less

The extension resolves the targeted club record from a user-supplied request argument in its frontend edit, update, and activate actions, but performs no ownership check in any of them. An unauthenticated visitor who knows the UID of a club record can send a direct request to the update or activate action and overwrite that record, or publish one still awaiting approval, without owning it.Show less

The extension validates the HMAC of a frontend employee edit link only in the action that renders the edit form, not in the action that persists the change. An unauthenticated visitor who knows the UID of a visible employee record can send a direct POST request to the update action and overwrite that record without a valid edit link or any ownership check.Show less