Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 did not perform an authorization check on several board-instance actions in the Boards area of the Dashboard. The instance details single-page controller resolved a board instance directly fr...Show moreConcrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 did not perform an authorization check on several board-instance actions in the Boards area of the Dashboard. The instance details single-page controller resolved a board instance directly from an attacker-supplied instance ID and then viewed, refreshed, regenerated, or deleted it without verifying that the requester held edit_board_settings on the instance's parent board. As a result, a user granted board-edit rights on a single board could reach the instances of any other board on the site by supplying their instance IDs. The affected actions bypassed the controller's permission-checked accessor (the same accessor used by the read view, which runs canEditBoardSettings on the parent board) and validated only an action-scoped CSRF token, which is bound to the action name rather than to the target object and is therefore reusable across boards. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Winston Crooker for reporting.Show less |
Concrete CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.2 was missing an authorization check on the Express entries advanced-search dashboard action. The advanced_search() method in DashboardSelectableExpressEntryListTrait resolved an Express en...Show moreConcrete CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.2 was missing an authorization check on the Express entries advanced-search dashboard action. The advanced_search() method in DashboardSelectableExpressEntryListTrait resolved an Express entity directly from a user-supplied entity ID and rendered that entity's entries without invoking canViewExpressEntries(), the per-entity permission check that the sibling results() action enforced. An authenticated dashboard user holding view_express_entries on a single Express entity could read the entries of any other entity, including secret attribute values, by requesting the advanced-search action with that entity's ID, disclosing form submissions and CRM-style records across the per-entity permission boundary that Express is designed to enforce. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Winston Crooker for reporting.Show less |
Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 does not perform an authorization check in three actions of the Boards data source dashboard controller (update, update_data_source, and delete_data_source), which resolve a ConfiguredDataSou...Show moreConcrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 does not perform an authorization check in three actions of the Boards data source dashboard controller (update, update_data_source, and delete_data_source), which resolve a ConfiguredDataSource directly from an attacker-supplied identifier without confirming the requester's edit permission on the owning board. A user granted edit_board_settings on a single board was therefore able to modify or permanently delete the configured data sources of any other board on the site, halting the affected board's content feed and resetting its custom weighting. The CSRF token that guards these actions was validated but bound to the action name rather than to the target object, so a token legitimately obtained for one board could be replayed against another board's ConfiguredDataSource identifier and did not constrain access. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Winston Crooker for reporting.Show less |
In Bootloader, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for e...Show moreIn Bootloader, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less |
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, an earlier product sub-form hardening change left store() in packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Products/Form/Media.php without the edit_products authoriz...Show moreShopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, an earlier product sub-form hardening change left store() in packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Products/Form/Media.php without the edit_products authorization check used by sibling sub-forms. An authenticated staff user with browse_products can invoke the Livewire store action and replace the thumbnail and gallery images for a product whose Media component was initialized, even without product-edit permission. The product binding is locked, so the attacker cannot redirect the update to an arbitrary product through client-side ID substitution, and the impact is limited to products whose edit pages were loaded. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.2.Show less |
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Products/VariantStock.php exposes stockAction() without edit_product_variants authorization and leaves public $variant...Show moreShopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Products/VariantStock.php exposes stockAction() without edit_product_variants authorization and leaves public $variant client mutable because it lacks the Livewire Locked attribute. Any authenticated admin-panel user, including staff with only browse_products, can select an arbitrary product variant and inventory location through component state, then submit a positive or negative quantity adjustment. This permits browse-only staff to inflate stock, reduce stock, or force out-of-stock states for variants outside the current page. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.2.Show less |
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, groupedBulkActions in packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pages/Attribute/Browse.php, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pages/Tag/Index.php, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pag...Show moreShopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, groupedBulkActions in packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pages/Attribute/Browse.php, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pages/Tag/Index.php, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pages/Brand/Index.php, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pages/Category/Index.php, and packages/admin/src/Livewire/Pages/Supplier/Index.php omit server-side authorization while the pages require only browse_attributes, browse_tags, browse_brands, browse_categories, or browse_suppliers. A browse-only staff user can invoke DeleteBulkAction to mass delete attributes or tags and can invoke BulkAction::make('enabled') or BulkAction::make('disabled') to change attribute, brand, category, or supplier visibility. These operations can break product variants and substantially disrupt storefront catalog visibility. Per-record actions and the comparison pages identified by the advisory are correctly authorized and are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.2.Show less |
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Collection/CollectionProducts.php exposes Action::make('delete') and DeleteBulkAction::make() without delete_collection...Show moreShopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.9.2, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Collection/CollectionProducts.php exposes Action::make('delete') and DeleteBulkAction::make() without delete_collections authorization, while public Collection $collection remains client mutable because it lacks the Livewire Locked attribute. An authenticated staff user with only browse_collections can invoke a Livewire removal action, substitute an arbitrary collection identifier, and detach selected products or empty the collection. This can disrupt catalog landing pages and promotions associated with the targeted collection. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.2.Show less |
Concrete CMS 9.2.0 to 9.5.2 did not enforce per-field edit_user_properties permissions on the REST API user write endpoints (PUT /ccm/api/1.0/users/{uID} and POST /ccm/api/1.0/users/{uID}/change_password). A user with an...Show moreConcrete CMS 9.2.0 to 9.5.2 did not enforce per-field edit_user_properties permissions on the REST API user write endpoints (PUT /ccm/api/1.0/users/{uID} and POST /ccm/api/1.0/users/{uID}/change_password). A user with an update-scoped OAuth token and permission to edit only one non-sensitive field could change another non-superuser's password, username, email, and attributes, taking over that account. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 7.4 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks riodrwn for reporting.Show less |
IBM Business Automation Workflow containers and traditional could allow an authenticated attacker to trigger restricted import actions due to missing authorization controls. |
motionEye (mEye) is an online interface for a piece of software called "motion," which is a video surveillance program with motion detection. Prior to 0.44.0, the ActionHandler.post() method in motioneye/handlers/action....Show moremotionEye (mEye) is an online interface for a piece of software called "motion," which is a video surveillance program with motion detection. Prior to 0.44.0, the ActionHandler.post() method in motioneye/handlers/action.py lacks the BaseHandler.auth() decorator, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to send requests to /action/<camera_id>/<action>. The endpoint can trigger snapshot, record_start, and record_stop actions. When an administrator has configured action scripts, the same endpoint can invoke PTZ controls, alarm actions, lighting actions, and other predefined commands, and configured remote motionEye cameras can allow server-side requests to the remote camera service. This issue is fixed in version 0.44.0.Show less |
Concrete CMS 9 (9.0.0 through 9.5.2) does not perform an authorization check on the user selector autocomplete endpoint (/ccm/system/user/autocomplete), which backs the "Preview as User" panel and other user-selector com...Show moreConcrete CMS 9 (9.0.0 through 9.5.2) does not perform an authorization check on the user selector autocomplete endpoint (/ccm/system/user/autocomplete), which backs the "Preview as User" panel and other user-selector components. The endpoint validates only a CSRF-style access token that is bound to the selector's display options rather than to the caller's identity or permissions, and that token is issued to anonymous visitors because the selector renders without an authorization check. Because an empty query resolves to a match-all filter, an unauthenticated attacker can submit an empty search and paginate the results to enumerate every backend account, disclosing the internal user ID, username, and email address of all administrative users, including the super-administrator (user ID 1). No password hashes or session material are disclosed The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 8.7 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks thirtythree and YesWeHack for reporting.Show less |
Flowise versions before 3.1.4 contain cross-tenant authorization gaps in Enterprise endpoints that fail to verify resource ownership before operations. Attackers with Enterprise access can delete arbitrary workspaces, in...Show moreFlowise versions before 3.1.4 contain cross-tenant authorization gaps in Enterprise endpoints that fail to verify resource ownership before operations. Attackers with Enterprise access can delete arbitrary workspaces, invite themselves into other organizations, modify cross-org roles, and abuse stored SSO secrets.Show less |
SmartAdmin API Java17 SpringBoot3 version 3.30.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the /employee/queryAll endpoint. The endpoint does not enforce the required function-level permission or data-scope aut...Show moreSmartAdmin API Java17 SpringBoot3 version 3.30.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the /employee/queryAll endpoint. The endpoint does not enforce the required function-level permission or data-scope authorization, allowing an authenticated low-privileged employee to retrieve employee records belonging to other departments and usersShow less |
1024-lab SmartAdmin v3.30.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the scheduled-job management module. The AdminSmartJobController exposes scheduled-job management endpoints without method-level permission ch...Show more1024-lab SmartAdmin v3.30.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the scheduled-job management module. The AdminSmartJobController exposes scheduled-job management endpoints without method-level permission checks, allowing a low-privileged authenticated user to access functionality intended for authorized administrators.Show less |
The "Design Scuole Italia" WordPress theme is affected by multiple Authorization Bypass vulnerabilities in the dsi_pdf_generator and dsi_csv_generator functions, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to access restricted...Show moreThe "Design Scuole Italia" WordPress theme is affected by multiple Authorization Bypass vulnerabilities in the dsi_pdf_generator and dsi_csv_generator functions, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to access restricted "Circolare" content and registered users' data. An unauthenticated RSS feed at /circolare/feed/ further facilitates exploitation.Show less |
ArcadeDB is a Multi-Model DBMS. Prior to 26.6.1, the fix for CVE-2026-44221 added an UPDATE_SCHEMA authorization check only to LocalDocumentType.createProperty, while the remaining public schema mutators in engine/src/ma...Show moreArcadeDB is a Multi-Model DBMS. Prior to 26.6.1, the fix for CVE-2026-44221 added an UPDATE_SCHEMA authorization check only to LocalDocumentType.createProperty, while the remaining public schema mutators in engine/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/schema/LocalDocumentType.java and engine/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/schema/LocalProperty.java remained unchecked. An authenticated identity, including a read-only API token without UPDATE_SCHEMA permission, can use DROP PROPERTY, ALTER TYPE, or ALTER PROPERTY through the database command/query HTTP endpoints to rename types, change inheritance, alter aliases or buckets, drop properties, and change property constraints. The issue does not directly disclose or write record data, but unauthorized schema mutation can corrupt the meaning of stored records and breach the documented permission model. This issue is fixed in version 26.6.1.Show less |
Woodpecker is a CI/CD engine. From 1.0.0 until 3.16.0, pipeline/backend/kubernetes/backend_options.go defines backend_options.kubernetes.serviceAccountName, and the Kubernetes backend in pipeline/backend/kubernetes/pod.g...Show moreWoodpecker is a CI/CD engine. From 1.0.0 until 3.16.0, pipeline/backend/kubernetes/backend_options.go defines backend_options.kubernetes.serviceAccountName, and the Kubernetes backend in pipeline/backend/kubernetes/pod.go copies that pipeline-step value directly into the pod specification without administrator authorization. Any user with Push permission on a connected repository can therefore run pipeline pods under an arbitrary ServiceAccount in the pipeline namespace and inherit that account's RBAC permissions. When a privileged ServiceAccount is reachable, the attacker can exfiltrate secrets such as database credentials, API keys, and TLS certificates and may take over the cluster. This issue is fixed in version 3.16.0.Show less |
GeoLens is a self-hosted geospatial data catalog with semantic search, OGC and STAC APIs, and a map builder. Prior to 1.2.3, multiple read and link endpoints authorize only the resource named in the request URL and fail...Show moreGeoLens is a self-hosted geospatial data catalog with semantic search, OGC and STAC APIs, and a map builder. Prior to 1.2.3, multiple read and link endpoints authorize only the resource named in the request URL and fail to re-authorize a second caller-influenced dataset reached through a relationship, map layer, VRT source, externalId lookup, or request body. When a public map references a private dataset, anonymous callers can use GET /maps/{id} and GET /maps/{id}/style.json to obtain the private layer's metadata, sampled values, or vector tiles. The style response can expose a replayable HMAC tile URL that is bound to neither a user nor a map. When a public source dataset has a relationship to a private target dataset, anonymous callers can use the dataset relationship APIs to enumerate the relationship and read rows from the private target's backing table. Anonymous callers can also use GET /collections/datasets/items with an externalId dataset UUID to obtain metadata for any private, restricted, or unpublished dataset because that lookup performs no visibility check. Authenticated users with the default editor role can mosaic another user's private raster into an owned VRT and read its pixels, and POST /ai/metadata/{summary,keywords,lineage,quality-statement} accepts a body-controlled dataset_id without a visibility check and returns private metadata and sample values. Pre-existing vrt_source_links also expose unauthorized member metadata and health unless each member is filtered at read time. These paths can disclose vector geometries and attributes, raster pixels, table rows, table names, column schemas, feature counts, extents, source URLs and filenames, contacts, and sampled row values. This issue is fixed in version 1.2.3.Show less |
Pipelines-as-Code is a CI/CD system that lets users define Tekton pipelines in source code repositories. Prior to 0.37.8, 0.39.6, 0.42.1, and 0.48.0, a GitHub App installation token created during webhook processing is n...Show morePipelines-as-Code is a CI/CD system that lets users define Tekton pipelines in source code repositories. Prior to 0.37.8, 0.39.6, 0.42.1, and 0.48.0, a GitHub App installation token created during webhook processing is not scoped to the repository that triggered the event when the App is installed across multiple repositories. A user with push access to one repository can submit a PipelineRun containing a pipelinesascode.tekton.dev/task remote task annotation that targets a private repository in the same installation. When ScopeTokenToListOfRepos returns no explicit scope, the missing triggering repository ID leaves the token able to access the entire installation. Pipelines-as-Code resolves and inlines the remote private task with that token, disclosing the repository's Tekton definitions. The demonstrated impact is read-only and does not provide write access. This issue is fixed in versions 0.37.8, 0.39.6, 0.42.1, and 0.48.0.Show less |