← Back
CWE-862

11,281 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (11,281)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the StoreProductController onSale handler that allows authenticated back-office users to modify product sale status. Attackers can invoke the GET...Show more
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the StoreProductController onSale handler that allows authenticated back-office users to modify product sale status. Attackers can invoke the GET /admin-api/product/store-product/sale endpoint with sequential product IDs to withdraw entire product catalogs from sale or re-enable withdrawn products without proper permission checks.Show less
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the CrmInvoiceController issueInvoice endpoint that allows authenticated back-office users to issue arbitrary invoices. Attackers can call the PUT...Show more
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the CrmInvoiceController issueInvoice endpoint that allows authenticated back-office users to issue arbitrary invoices. Attackers can call the PUT /admin-api/crm/invoice/issue endpoint without required permissions to modify invoice status, inflate contract invoiced amounts with attacker-chosen values, and trigger invoice emails to arbitrary addresses.Show less
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 fails to enforce authorization on the saveRedisSet and getRedisSet endpoints in CrmCustomerController, allowing any authenticated back-office user to read and modify installation-wide lead-allocat...Show more
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 fails to enforce authorization on the saveRedisSet and getRedisSet endpoints in CrmCustomerController, allowing any authenticated back-office user to read and modify installation-wide lead-allocation and customer auto-recycling policy. Attackers can invoke these endpoints to manipulate shared Redis keys controlling customer auto-recycling behavior, causing mass customer data deletion, disabling lead recycling, or blocking customer creation across the deployment.Show less
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 fails to enforce authorization on the sendSms and sendMail endpoints in CrmCustomerController, allowing any authenticated back-office user to send SMS and email to arbitrary customers. Attackers c...Show more
yshop-crm through 2.1.3 fails to enforce authorization on the sendSms and sendMail endpoints in CrmCustomerController, allowing any authenticated back-office user to send SMS and email to arbitrary customers. Attackers can invoke POST /admin-api/crm/customer/send-sms and POST /admin-api/crm/customer/send-mail with arbitrary customerIds, templateCode, and templateParams to deliver unauthorized messages through the organization's SMS and email channels.Show less
1Apache
1Zookeeper
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The `deleteContainer` opcode (0x14/20) is processed without verifying the caller's ACL permissions, allowing any authenticated client to delete specific znodes in the data tree regardless of the ACL restrictions on the z...Show more
The `deleteContainer` opcode (0x14/20) is processed without verifying the caller's ACL permissions, allowing any authenticated client to delete specific znodes in the data tree regardless of the ACL restrictions on the znode or its parent. This opcode is considered internal-only and the official client doesn't have API for it, but a client that can open a plain TCP session on the ZooKeeper client port (2181 by default) - with NO authentication and NO ACL permissions - can delete any empty persistent znode (including regular persistent nodes, container nodes, and TTL nodes) by issuing the raw protocol OpCode deleteContainer (20). The deleteContainer request path completely skips both the session check and the DELETE ACL check that are enforced by the regular delete (OpCode 2) path. This is an authorization bypass / ACL enforcement bug. This issue affects Apache ZooKeeper: from 3.9.0 through 3.9.5, from 3.8.0 through 3.8.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.6 or 3.8.7, which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Zookeeper
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Information disclosure via SetWatches reconnect replay in Apache ZooKeeper due to missing ACL check. An attacker can discover ACL-restricted paths by registering exists-watches on non-existent paths, then reconnecting af...Show more
Information disclosure via SetWatches reconnect replay in Apache ZooKeeper due to missing ACL check. An attacker can discover ACL-restricted paths by registering exists-watches on non-existent paths, then reconnecting after the paths are created with restricted ACLs. Issue is caused by incomplete fix for CVE-2024-23944 (ZOOKEEPER-4799). The fix added ACL checking to WatchManager.triggerWatch(). However, DataTree.setWatches() — the SetWatches/SetWatches2 reconnect replay handler — still calls watcher.process(event) with null ACL, bypassing the check entirely. It's important to note that only the path is exposed by this vulnerability, not the data of znode, but since znode path can contain sensitive information like user name or login ID, this issue is potentially critical. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.6, 3.8.7 which fixes the issue.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Sep 28, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 13.0 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to prevent...Show more
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 13.0 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to prevent another user from modifying their group settings due to improper validation of group URL slugs during namespace transfers.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Sep 28, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 13.9 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that an authenticated user with developer-role permissions could substitute packag...Show more
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 13.9 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that an authenticated user with developer-role permissions could substitute package file content and hide packages from their owners due to improper authorization checks in the Generic Package Registry.Show less
1Gitlab
1Gitlab
Sep 28, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.11 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with the Secu...Show more
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.11 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with the Security Manager role to execute arbitrary CI/CD jobs and access protected variables within group projects due to improper authorization controls on compliance framework management.Show less
-
-
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Subscriptions for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.3 does not verify the security token on the request that cancels a subscription, allowing attackers to make a logged-in customer cancel their own active subsc...Show more
The Subscriptions for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.3 does not verify the security token on the request that cancels a subscription, allowing attackers to make a logged-in customer cancel their own active subscription through a crafted request they are tricked into making.Show less
-
-
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
3.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not properly authorise order finalisation when its offline (local) payment method is enabled, relying on a nonce that is exposed to unauthenticated visitors and never chec...Show more
The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not properly authorise order finalisation when its offline (local) payment method is enabled, relying on a nonce that is exposed to unauthenticated visitors and never checking that the caller owns the order, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reset any existing order and its attendees to a pending state and thereby invalidate paid tickets.Show less
-
-
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
2.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not verify a user's capability to create accounts when adding a speaker, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to create new WordPress user accounts that...Show more
The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not verify a user's capability to create accounts when adding a speaker, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to create new WordPress user accounts that carry capabilities beyond their own, including publishing content and uploading files, and, by supplying an email address they control, to obtain a working login to the created account.Show less
-
-
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not prevent the token issued to a guest at checkout from being used to change that order's tickets afterwards, allowing unauthenticated users to replace a paid ticket with...Show more
The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not prevent the token issued to a guest at checkout from being used to change that order's tickets afterwards, allowing unauthenticated users to replace a paid ticket with a free one and complete the order at no charge.Show less
-
-
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The MultiVendorX WordPress plugin before 5.0.16 does not verify that a user owns the store they are acting on in one of its REST API routes, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to overwrite any store'...Show more
The MultiVendorX WordPress plugin before 5.0.16 does not verify that a user owns the store they are acting on in one of its REST API routes, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to overwrite any store's details and payout settings and to replace the record of who owns it.Show less
-
-
Sep 16, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
The TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a us...Show more
The TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the email address of arbitrary user accounts, including administrators, which can be leveraged to reset the account's password and gain access to it.Show less
-
-
Sep 16, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Ad Inserter – Ad Manager & AdSense Ads plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.16 due to a missing capability check on the `ai-debug-code` URL-parameter. T...Show more
The Ad Inserter – Ad Manager & AdSense Ads plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.16 due to a missing capability check on the `ai-debug-code` URL-parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view administrator-configured header and footer code blocks that have been disabled from public display.Show less
-
-
Sep 16, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
@jitsi/electron-sdk before 10.0.5 exposes getDesktopSources() via contextBridge without requiring an active getDisplayMedia() picker, allowing any script in the meeting page to enumerate screens and windows. Attackers ca...Show more
@jitsi/electron-sdk before 10.0.5 exposes getDesktopSources() via contextBridge without requiring an active getDisplayMedia() picker, allowing any script in the meeting page to enumerate screens and windows. Attackers can call the jitsi-screen-sharing-get-sources IPC route to retrieve desktop thumbnails at arbitrary resolution without user consent or operating system permission prompts.Show less
-
-
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The myPRO Manager notification gateway exposes an unauthenticated HTTP endpoint used to send SMS messages through a connected GSM modem. The endpoint is accessible over the network and does not require authentication bef...Show more
The myPRO Manager notification gateway exposes an unauthenticated HTTP endpoint used to send SMS messages through a connected GSM modem. The endpoint is accessible over the network and does not require authentication before accepting a phone number and message from a request and sending the specified SMS message. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the notification gateway could exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary SMS messages through the connected modem.Show less
-
-
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
The mySCADA myPRO Manager command API does not properly enforce authentication for privileged functions. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected API could exploit this vulnerability to access priv...Show more
The mySCADA myPRO Manager command API does not properly enforce authentication for privileged functions. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected API could exploit this vulnerability to access privileged management functions.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
4.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Missing authorization in Transactions Platform in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security s...Show more
Missing authorization in Transactions Platform in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less