The 3D FlipBook – PDF Embedder, PDF Flipbook Viewer, Flipbook Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the send_post_pages_json() function in al...Show moreThe 3D FlipBook – PDF Embedder, PDF Flipbook Viewer, Flipbook Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the send_post_pages_json() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.16.17. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve flipbook page metadata for draft, private and password-protected flipbooks.Show less |
Jellyfin is an open source self hosted media server. Versions prior to 10.11.7 contain an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability via ffmpeg argument injection through the StreamOptions query parameter parsing...Show moreJellyfin is an open source self hosted media server. Versions prior to 10.11.7 contain an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability via ffmpeg argument injection through the StreamOptions query parameter parsing mechanism. The ParseStreamOptions method in StreamingHelpers.cs adds any lowercase query parameter to a dictionary without validation, bypassing the RegularExpression attribute on the level controller parameter, and the unsanitized value is concatenated directly into the ffmpeg command line. By injecting a drawtext filter with a textfile argument, an attacker can read arbitrary server files such as /etc/shadow and exfiltrate their contents as text rendered in the video stream response. The vulnerable /Videos/{itemId}/stream endpoint has no Authorize attribute, making this exploitable without authentication, though item GUIDs are pseudorandom and require an authenticated user to obtain. This issue has been fixed in version 10.11.7.Show less |
The Nexi XPay plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to missing authorization checks on the redirect function in all versions up to, and including, 8.3.0. This makes it possible for u...Show moreThe Nexi XPay plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to missing authorization checks on the redirect function in all versions up to, and including, 8.3.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to mark pending WooCommerce orders as paid/completed.Show less |
A improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2 may allow an...Show moreA improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication via replaying captured 2FA request. The attack requires being able to intercept and decrypt authentication traffic and precise timing to replay the request before token expiration, which raises the attack complexity.Show less |
The Eventin – Events Calendar, Event Booking, Ticket & Registration (AI Powered) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a improper capability check on the get_item_permissions_check() fu...Show moreThe Eventin – Events Calendar, Event Booking, Ticket & Registration (AI Powered) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a improper capability check on the get_item_permissions_check() function in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.8. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to read arbitrary order data including customer PII (name, email, phone) by iterating order IDs.Show less |
The LearnPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized data deletion due to a missing capability check on the `delete_question_answer()` function in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.2.8. The plugin expos...Show moreThe LearnPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized data deletion due to a missing capability check on the `delete_question_answer()` function in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.2.8. The plugin exposes a `wp_rest` nonce in public frontend HTML (`lpData`) to unauthenticated visitors, and uses that nonce as the only security gate for the `lp-load-ajax` AJAX dispatcher. The `delete_question_answer` action has no capability or ownership check. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete any quiz answer option by sending a crafted POST request with a publicly available nonce.Show less |
Due to a missing authorization check in SAP Business Analytics and SAP Content Management, an authenticated user could make unauthorized calls to certain remote function modules, potentially accessing sensitive informati...Show moreDue to a missing authorization check in SAP Business Analytics and SAP Content Management, an authenticated user could make unauthorized calls to certain remote function modules, potentially accessing sensitive information beyond their intended permissions. This vulnerability affects confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability.Show less |
Due to a missing authorization check in SAP ERP and SAP S/4HANA (Private Cloud and On-Premise), an authenticated attacker could execute a particular ABAP report to overwrite any existing eight?character executable ABAP r...Show moreDue to a missing authorization check in SAP ERP and SAP S/4HANA (Private Cloud and On-Premise), an authenticated attacker could execute a particular ABAP report to overwrite any existing eight?character executable ABAP report without authorization. If the overwritten report is subsequently executed, the intended functionality could become unavailable. Successful exploitation impacts availability, with a limited impact on integrity confined to the affected report, while confidentiality remains unaffected.Show less |
Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA frontend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. Thi...Show moreDue to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA frontend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted.Show less |
Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA backend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This...Show moreDue to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA backend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted.Show less |
Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA OData Service (Manage Reference Equipment), an attacker could update and delete child entities via OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability ha...Show moreDue to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA OData Service (Manage Reference Equipment), an attacker could update and delete child entities via OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted.Show less |
Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA OData Service (Manage Technical Object Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This...Show moreDue to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA OData Service (Manage Technical Object Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability results in a low impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted.Show less |
Due to a missing authorization check, SAP S/4HANA (Private Cloud and On-Premise) allows an authenticated user to delete files on the operating system and gain unauthorized control over file operations which could leads t...Show moreDue to a missing authorization check, SAP S/4HANA (Private Cloud and On-Premise) allows an authenticated user to delete files on the operating system and gain unauthorized control over file operations which could leads to no impact on Confidentiality, Low impact on Integrity and Availability of the application.Show less |
The Material Master application does not enforce authorization checks for authenticated users when executing reports, resulting in the disclosure of sensitive information. This vulnerability has a low impact on confident...Show moreThe Material Master application does not enforce authorization checks for authenticated users when executing reports, resulting in the disclosure of sensitive information. This vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality and does not affect integrity and availability of the system.Show less |
Craft Commerce is an ecommerce platform for Craft CMS. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.10.2 and 5.0.0 through 5.5.4, the PaymentsController::actionPay discloses some order data to unauthenticated users when an order number i...Show moreCraft Commerce is an ecommerce platform for Craft CMS. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.10.2 and 5.0.0 through 5.5.4, the PaymentsController::actionPay discloses some order data to unauthenticated users when an order number is provided and the email check fails during an anonymous payment. The JSON error response includes the serialized order object (order), which contains some sensitive fields such as customer email, shipping address, and billing address. The frontend payment flow's actionPay() retrieves orders by number before authorization is fully enforcedLoad order by number. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.11.0 and 5.6.0.Show less |
A vulnerability was determined in FoundationAgents MetaGPT up to 0.8.1. The impacted element is the function evaluateCode of the file metagpt/environment/minecraft/mineflayer/index.js of the component Mineflayer HTTP API...Show moreA vulnerability was determined in FoundationAgents MetaGPT up to 0.8.1. The impacted element is the function evaluateCode of the file metagpt/environment/minecraft/mineflayer/index.js of the component Mineflayer HTTP API. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.Show less |
The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized private course enrollment in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7. This is due to missing post_status validation...Show moreThe Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized private course enrollment in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7. This is due to missing post_status validation in the `enroll_now()` and `course_enrollment()` functions. Both enrollment endpoints verify the nonce, user authentication, and whether the course is purchasable, but fail to check if the course has a `private` post_status. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Subscriber-level access or above to enroll in private courses by sending a crafted POST request with the target course ID. The enrollment record is created in the database and the private course title and enrollment status are exposed in the subscriber's dashboard, though WordPress core access control prevents the subscriber from viewing the actual course content (returns 404). Enrollment in private courses should be restricted to users with the `read_private_posts` capability.Show less |
goshs is a SimpleHTTPServer written in Go. Prior to 2.0.0-beta.4, goshs enforces the documented per-folder .goshs ACL/basic-auth mechanism for directory listings and file reads, but it does not enforce the same authoriza...Show moregoshs is a SimpleHTTPServer written in Go. Prior to 2.0.0-beta.4, goshs enforces the documented per-folder .goshs ACL/basic-auth mechanism for directory listings and file reads, but it does not enforce the same authorization checks for state-changing routes. An unauthenticated attacker can upload files with PUT, upload files with multipart POST /upload, create directories with ?mkdir, and delete files with ?delete inside a .goshs-protected directory. By deleting the .goshs file itself, the attacker can remove the folder's auth policy and then access previously protected content without credentials. This results in a critical authorization bypass affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.0-beta.4.Show less |
TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 2.7.2, TREK was missing authorization checks on the Immich trip photo management routes. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.7.2. |
Chamilo LMS is a learning management system. Prior to 1.11.38, the get_user_info_from_username REST API endpoint returns personal information (email, first name, last name, user ID, active status) of any user to any auth...Show moreChamilo LMS is a learning management system. Prior to 1.11.38, the get_user_info_from_username REST API endpoint returns personal information (email, first name, last name, user ID, active status) of any user to any authenticated user, including students. There is no authorization check. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.11.38.Show less |