Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The SEUR Oficial WordPress plugin before 1.7.0 does not sanitize and escape some of its settings allowing high privilege users to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowedShow less

The ACF Photo Gallery Field WordPress plugin before 1.7.5 does not sanitise and escape the post parameter in the includes/acf_photo_gallery_metabox_edit.php file before outputing back in an attribute, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting issueShow less

SAP Enterprise Threat Detection (ETD) - version 2.0, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs which may lead to an unauthorized attacker possibly exploit XSS vulnerability. The UIs in ETD are using SAP UI5 standard controls, the UI5 framework provides automated output encoding for its standard controls. This output encoding prevents stored malicious user input from being executed when it is reflected in the UI.Show less

Potential vulnerabilities have been identified in Micro Focus ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager, affecting versions 7.4.x and 7.5.x. The vulnerabilities could be remotely exploited resulting in Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).Show less

Potential vulnerabilities have been identified in Micro Focus ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager, affecting versions 7.4.x and 7.5.x. The vulnerabilities could be remotely exploited resulting in Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).Show less

Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the search functionality of AlCoda NetBiblio WebOPAC allows an unauthenticated user to craft a reflected Cross-Site Scripting attack. This issue affects: AlCoda NetBiblio WebOPAC versions prior to 4.0.0.320; versions later than 4.0.0.328. This issue does not affect: AlCoda NetBiblio WebOPAC version 4.0.0.335 and later versions.Show less

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.Show less

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.Show less

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.Show less