← Back
CWE-787

15,273 CVEs • Abstraction: Base • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Out-of-bounds Write

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (15,273)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Sep 8, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validati...Show more
MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.Show less
1Themoos
1Core Moos
Oct 14, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a pre-authentication heap overflow vulnerability in MOOSCommPkt packet handling that allows remote attackers to write arbitrary data by declaring a negative packet length. Attackers...Show more
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a pre-authentication heap overflow vulnerability in MOOSCommPkt packet handling that allows remote attackers to write arbitrary data by declaring a negative packet length. Attackers can exploit the signed integer check in InflateTo() and negative size conversion in recv() to overflow a four-byte heap buffer during the HandShake phase before authentication.Show less
1Mit
1Moos Ivp
Oct 14, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 contains multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities in IvP function string decoders that trust attacker-controlled length fields without validation. Attackers can craft malicious encoded strings wit...Show more
MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 contains multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities in IvP function string decoders that trust attacker-controlled length fields without validation. Attackers can craft malicious encoded strings with mismatched declared and actual field lengths to overflow heap and stack buffers, potentially achieving remote code execution through MOOS variables or alog files.Show less
1Ni
1Dasylab
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
There is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in DASYLab due to improper validation of user-supplied data, resulting in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to...Show more
There is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in DASYLab due to improper validation of user-supplied data, resulting in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .DSB file.  This issue affects all versions before 2026.0.0.Show less
1Ni
1Dasylab
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
There is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in DASYLab due to improper validation of user-supplied data, resulting in a write past the end of an allocated heap. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a use...Show more
There is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in DASYLab due to improper validation of user-supplied data, resulting in a write past the end of an allocated heap. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .DSB file.  This issue affects all versions before 2026.0.0.Show less
1Ni
1Dasylab
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
There is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in DASYLab due to lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .DSB file.  This iss...Show more
There is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in DASYLab due to lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .DSB file.  This issue affects all versions before 2026.0.0.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Sep 8, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Out of bounds write in WebGL in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.82 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
pymonocypher uses cython to wrap the Monocypher C library. Prior to version 4.0.2.8, the argon2i_32 implementation does not check the nb_blocks size. If the caller does not provide a sufficiently large buffer based on th...Show more
pymonocypher uses cython to wrap the Monocypher C library. Prior to version 4.0.2.8, the argon2i_32 implementation does not check the nb_blocks size. If the caller does not provide a sufficiently large buffer based on the API contract, then argon2i_32 will write past the end of the buffer and possibly corrupt the heap. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.2.8.Show less
1Mongodb
1C Driver
Sep 10, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
3.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
A memory-handling error in the BSON-to-JSON conversion helpers of the MongoDB C Driver can write a small number of bytes past the end of a heap buffer when a binary field is encoded and the output is cut short at a calle...Show more
A memory-handling error in the BSON-to-JSON conversion helpers of the MongoDB C Driver can write a small number of bytes past the end of a heap buffer when a binary field is encoded and the output is cut short at a caller-configured length limit. A party who supplies the document content, with no privileges on the application that links the driver, may cause a small amount of data outside the intended buffer to be altered.Show less
-
-
Sep 3, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
7.5 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
A remote code execution security issue exists in the affected products when parsing DOE files that could allow a remote attacker to write past the end of an allocated object and execute code within the context of the cur...Show more
A remote code execution security issue exists in the affected products when parsing DOE files that could allow a remote attacker to write past the end of an allocated object and execute code within the context of the current process. To exploit this vulnerability, a legitimate user must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
8.3 HIGH· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
zlib versions 1.3.1.2 through 1.3.2 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the gz_vacate() function when processing non-blocking gzwrite() operations with stale external buffer pointers. Attackers can trigger th...Show more
zlib versions 1.3.1.2 through 1.3.2 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the gz_vacate() function when processing non-blocking gzwrite() operations with stale external buffer pointers. Attackers can trigger the overflow by calling gzprintf() or gzvprintf() after a write stall, causing an unchecked memmove() to write beyond the internal input buffer boundary.Show less
-
-
Sep 8, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
N/A· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Out-of-bounds Write and Improper Validation of Array Index vulnerability in Samsung Open Source TizenFX Samsung/TizenFX allows Overflow Buffers.
1Redhat
1Enterprise Linux
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
N/A· v4
7.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A stack out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in gfs2-utils. In savemeta, the height value from on-disk inode metadata is used as a loop bound without bounds checking, causing a stack buffer overflow that may lead...Show more
A stack out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in gfs2-utils. In savemeta, the height value from on-disk inode metadata is used as a loop bound without bounds checking, causing a stack buffer overflow that may lead to arbitrary code execution when processing crafted GFS2 filesystem images.Show less
1Redhat
1Enterprise Linux
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
N/A· v4
7.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A stack out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in gfs2-utils. In gfs2_edit, the di_height field from on-disk inode metadata is used as an array index without bounds checking, causing a stack buffer overflow that may...Show more
A stack out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in gfs2-utils. In gfs2_edit, the di_height field from on-disk inode metadata is used as an array index without bounds checking, causing a stack buffer overflow that may lead to arbitrary code execution when processing crafted GFS2 filesystem images.Show less
-
-
Sep 10, 2026
Sep 2, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
PX4 Autopilot contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the sd_bench command that writes a four-byte block number into a user-supplied sized allocation. Attackers can invoke sd_bench with a block size below four b...Show more
PX4 Autopilot contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the sd_bench command that writes a four-byte block number into a user-supplied sized allocation. Attackers can invoke sd_bench with a block size below four bytes to overflow the heap buffer and potentially execute code or crash the system.Show less
-
-
Oct 19, 2026
Sep 1, 2026
8.6 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
A security issue exists within FactoryTalk® Historian Machine Edition. An attacker with low-level authentication could exploit this vulnerability to achieve remote code execution on the affected device.
-
-
Oct 14, 2026
Aug 31, 2026
N/A· v4
7.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw was found in GDB's STABS debug format parser. The read_member_functions() function in gdb/stabsread.c contains a linked list removal bug in the code that separates destructor and non-destructor member functions of...Show more
A flaw was found in GDB's STABS debug format parser. The read_member_functions() function in gdb/stabsread.c contains a linked list removal bug in the code that separates destructor and non-destructor member functions of C++ classes. The bug causes the destructor entries to remain in the main function list while the list length counter is decremented, resulting in an out-of-bounds write when the function list is copied to its final allocated array. An attacker can craft an ELF binary with malicious .stab and .stabstr sections that triggers this out-of-bounds write when a user opens the file in GDB and performs any symbol-inspection operation such as setting a breakpoint. The inferior process does not need to be executed. Under controlled conditions, this was demonstrated to achieve execution of arbitrary commands within the GDB process.Show less
-
-
Sep 1, 2026
Aug 31, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The LwM2M JSON content formatter's get_string() in subsys/net/lib/lwm2m/lwm2m_rw_json.c copies a parsed JSON string into a caller-supplied buffer and NUL-terminates it. The length guard used if (string_length > buflen),...Show more
The LwM2M JSON content formatter's get_string() in subsys/net/lib/lwm2m/lwm2m_rw_json.c copies a parsed JSON string into a caller-supplied buffer and NUL-terminates it. The length guard used if (string_length > buflen), which accepts a string whose length is exactly buflen. After memcpy() fills the whole buffer, buf[string_length] = '\0' then writes one byte past the end of the buffer (CWE-787). The string value and its length are taken directly from the incoming CoAP payload during a LwM2M WRITE: do_write_op_json() parses the payload obtained from coap_packet_get_payload(), and get_string() is invoked from lwm2m_write_handler() (engine_get_string() in subsys/net/lib/lwm2m/lwm2m_message_handling.c) for a LWM2M_RES_TYPE_STRING resource. The destination buf/buflen is either the resource instance's fixed data buffer (res_inst->data_ptr/max_data_len) or the engine validation buffer (msg->ctx->validate_buf). A LwM2M server (the client's DTLS peer) can therefore write a string resource with a value whose length equals the target buffer size and force a one-byte overflow. The overflow is a single out-of-bounds write of the constant byte 0x00 immediately past the resource or validation buffer, corrupting the adjacent byte in memory. It is not an information leak and the written value is fixed, so it is not a direct code-execution primitive, but it can corrupt adjacent state (an adjacent resource value, a length/flag field, or a struct field) and cause data corruption or a crash. Triggering the write is deterministic; the resulting impact depends on memory layout. The fix changes the guard to string_length >= buflen, rejecting the exact-length case and aligning the JSON formatter with the other content formatters (lwm2m_rw_plain_text.c, lwm2m_rw_oma_tlv.c, lwm2m_rw_senml_json.c, lwm2m_rw_cbor.c, lwm2m_rw_senml_cbor.c), which already used the correct boundary check.Show less
-
-
Aug 31, 2026
Aug 31, 2026
7.4 HIGH· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
9.0 HIGH· v2
A weakness has been identified in D-Link DSM-G600 1.01. This affects an unknown function of the file /load_file.cgi of the component Multipart Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to out-of-bounds write. The attack...Show more
A weakness has been identified in D-Link DSM-G600 1.01. This affects an unknown function of the file /load_file.cgi of the component Multipart Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to out-of-bounds write. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.Show less
-
-
Sep 1, 2026
Aug 28, 2026
2.0 LOW· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
CVE-2025-40843 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5xf2-f6ch-6p8r  was fixed by replacing unchecked strcpy() with a bounded safe_strcpy() helper. At ldlogger-tool-gcc.c:129 the destination passed to that helper is fullPat...Show more
CVE-2025-40843 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5xf2-f6ch-6p8r  was fixed by replacing unchecked strcpy() with a bounded safe_strcpy() helper. At ldlogger-tool-gcc.c:129 the destination passed to that helper is fullPath + 2, but the size passed down is the full PATH_MAX. safe_strcpy() is strncpy(), which NUL-pads the destination out to the whole n, so this site writes 4096 bytes into the 4094 that remain — a 2-byte stack overflow on every invocation, independent of the input path's length. This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.28.2.Show less