A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the built-in web interface of DiskBoss Enterprise versions 7.4.28, 7.5.12, and 8.2.14. The vulnerability arises from improper bounds checking on the path component of...Show moreA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the built-in web interface of DiskBoss Enterprise versions 7.4.28, 7.5.12, and 8.2.14. The vulnerability arises from improper bounds checking on the path component of HTTP GET requests. By sending a specially crafted long URI, a remote unauthenticated attacker can trigger a buffer overflow, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges on vulnerable Windows hosts.Show less |
NanoMQ v0.22.10 was discovered to contain a heap overflow which allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted CONNECT message. |
A flaw was found in polkit. When processing an XML policy with 32 or more nested elements in depth, an out-of-bounds write can be triggered. This issue can lead to a crash or other unexpected behavior, and arbitrary code...Show moreA flaw was found in polkit. When processing an XML policy with 32 or more nested elements in depth, an out-of-bounds write can be triggered. This issue can lead to a crash or other unexpected behavior, and arbitrary code execution is not discarded. To exploit this flaw, a high-privilege account is needed as it's required to place the malicious policy file properly.Show less |
A vulnerability was found in Tenda FH1205 2.0.0.7(775). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function formWifiExtraSet of the file /goform/WifiExtraSet. The manipulation of the argument wpapsk_crypto lea...Show moreA vulnerability was found in Tenda FH1205 2.0.0.7(775). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function formWifiExtraSet of the file /goform/WifiExtraSet. The manipulation of the argument wpapsk_crypto leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.Show less |
A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC500 2.0.1.9(1307). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formSetAPCfg of the file /goform/setWtpData. The manipulation of the argument radio...Show moreA vulnerability was found in Tenda AC500 2.0.1.9(1307). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formSetAPCfg of the file /goform/setWtpData. The manipulation of the argument radio_2g_1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.Show less |
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Affected by this issue is the function bfd_elf_set_group_contents of the file bfd/elf.c. The manipulation leads to out-of-bounds...Show moreA vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Affected by this issue is the function bfd_elf_set_group_contents of the file bfd/elf.c. The manipulation leads to out-of-bounds write. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 41461010eb7c79fee7a9d5f6209accdaac66cc6b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.Show less |
An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the connectivity fault management (CFM) daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MPC-BUILTIN, MPC1 through MPC9 line cards allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker...Show moreAn Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the connectivity fault management (CFM) daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MPC-BUILTIN, MPC1 through MPC9 line cards allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to send a malformed packet to the device, leading to an FPC crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.
This issue affects Juniper Networks:
Junos OS:
* All versions before 22.2R3-S1,
* from 22.4 before 22.4R2.
This feature is not enabled by default.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: p54: prevent buffer-overflow in p54_rx_eeprom_readback()
Robert Morris reported:
|If a malicious USB device pretends to be an Intersil p54 wifi...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: p54: prevent buffer-overflow in p54_rx_eeprom_readback()
Robert Morris reported:
|If a malicious USB device pretends to be an Intersil p54 wifi
|interface and generates an eeprom_readback message with a large
|eeprom->v1.len, p54_rx_eeprom_readback() will copy data from the
|message beyond the end of priv->eeprom.
|
|static void p54_rx_eeprom_readback(struct p54_common *priv,
| struct sk_buff *skb)
|{
| struct p54_hdr *hdr = (struct p54_hdr *) skb->data;
| struct p54_eeprom_lm86 *eeprom = (struct p54_eeprom_lm86 *) hdr->data;
|
| if (priv->fw_var >= 0x509) {
| memcpy(priv->eeprom, eeprom->v2.data,
| le16_to_cpu(eeprom->v2.len));
| } else {
| memcpy(priv->eeprom, eeprom->v1.data,
| le16_to_cpu(eeprom->v1.len));
| }
| [...]
The eeprom->v{1,2}.len is set by the driver in p54_download_eeprom().
The device is supposed to provide the same length back to the driver.
But yes, it's possible (like shown in the report) to alter the value
to something that causes a crash/panic due to overrun.
This patch addresses the issue by adding the size to the common device
context, so p54_rx_eeprom_readback no longer relies on possibly tampered
values... That said, it also checks if the "firmware" altered the value
and no longer copies them.
The one, small saving grace is: Before the driver tries to read the eeprom,
it needs to upload >a< firmware. the vendor firmware has a proprietary
license and as a reason, it is not present on most distributions by
default.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: Fix buffer overflow in debugfs
If the user tries to write more than 32 bytes then it results in memory
corruption. Fortunately, this is...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: Fix buffer overflow in debugfs
If the user tries to write more than 32 bytes then it results in memory
corruption. Fortunately, this is debugfs so it's limited to root users.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
EDAC/skx_common: Fix general protection fault
After loading i10nm_edac (which automatically loads skx_edac_common), if
unload only i10nm_edac, then re...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
EDAC/skx_common: Fix general protection fault
After loading i10nm_edac (which automatically loads skx_edac_common), if
unload only i10nm_edac, then reload it and perform error injection testing,
a general protection fault may occur:
mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
Oops: general protection fault ...
...
Workqueue: events mce_gen_pool_process
RIP: 0010:string+0x53/0xe0
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? die_addr+0x37/0x90
? exc_general_protection+0x1e7/0x3f0
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
? string+0x53/0xe0
vsnprintf+0x23e/0x4c0
snprintf+0x4d/0x70
skx_adxl_decode+0x16a/0x330 [skx_edac_common]
skx_mce_check_error.part.0+0xf8/0x220 [skx_edac_common]
skx_mce_check_error+0x17/0x20 [skx_edac_common]
...
The issue arose was because the variable 'adxl_component_count' (inside
skx_edac_common), which counts the ADXL components, was not reset. During
the reloading of i10nm_edac, the count was incremented by the actual number
of ADXL components again, resulting in a count that was double the real
number of ADXL components. This led to an out-of-bounds reference to the
ADXL component array, causing the general protection fault above.
Fix this issue by resetting the 'adxl_component_count' in adxl_put(),
which is called during the unloading of {skx,i10nm}_edac.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ring-buffer: Do not trigger WARN_ON() due to a commit_overrun
When reading a memory mapped buffer the reader page is just swapped out
with the last pa...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ring-buffer: Do not trigger WARN_ON() due to a commit_overrun
When reading a memory mapped buffer the reader page is just swapped out
with the last page written in the write buffer. If the reader page is the
same as the commit buffer (the buffer that is currently being written to)
it was assumed that it should never have missed events. If it does, it
triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE().
But there just happens to be one scenario where this can legitimately
happen. That is on a commit_overrun. A commit overrun is when an interrupt
preempts an event being written to the buffer and then the interrupt adds
so many new events that it fills and wraps the buffer back to the commit.
Any new events would then be dropped and be reported as "missed_events".
In this case, the next page to read is the commit buffer and after the
swap of the reader page, the reader page will be the commit buffer, but
this time there will be missed events and this triggers the following
warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1127 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:7357 ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x49a/0x780
Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1127 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00004-g478bc2824b45-dirty #564 PREEMPT
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x49a/0x780
Code: 00 00 00 48 89 fe 48 c1 ee 03 80 3c 2e 00 0f 85 ec 01 00 00 4d 3b a6 a8 00 00 00 0f 85 8a fd ff ff 48 85 c0 0f 84 55 fe ff ff <0f> 0b e9 4e fe ff ff be 08 00 00 00 4c 89 54 24 58 48 89 54 24 50
RSP: 0018:ffff888121787dc0 EFLAGS: 00010002
RAX: 00000000000006a2 RBX: ffff888100062800 RCX: ffffffff8190cb49
RDX: ffff888126934c00 RSI: 1ffff11020200a15 RDI: ffff8881010050a8
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed1024d26982
R10: ffff888126934c17 R11: ffff8881010050a8 R12: ffff888126934c00
R13: ffff8881010050b8 R14: ffff888101005000 R15: ffff888126930008
FS: 00007f95c8cd7540(0000) GS:ffff8882b576e000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f95c8de4dc0 CR3: 0000000128452002 CR4: 0000000000172ef0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __pfx_ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x10/0x10
tracing_buffers_ioctl+0x283/0x370
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190
do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f95c8de48db
Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <89> c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1c 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007ffe037ba110 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe037bb2b0 RCX: 00007f95c8de48db
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000005220 RDI: 0000000000000006
RBP: 00007ffe037ba180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffe037bb6f8 R14: 00007f95c9065000 R15: 00005575c7492c90
</TASK>
irq event stamp: 5080
hardirqs last enabled at (5079): [<ffffffff83e0adb0>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x50/0x70
hardirqs last disabled at (5080): [<ffffffff83e0aa83>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x70
softirqs last enabled at (4182): [<ffffffff81516122>] handle_softirqs+0x552/0x710
softirqs last disabled at (4159): [<ffffffff815163f7>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x107/0x210
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The above was triggered by running on a kernel with both lockdep and KASAN
as well as kmemleak enabled and executing the following command:
# perf record -o perf-test.dat -a -- trace-cmd record --nosplice -e all -p function hackbench 50
With perf interjecting a lot of interrupts and trace-cmd enabling all
events as well as function tracing, with lockdep, KASAN and kmemleak
enabled, it could cause an interrupt preempting an event being written to
add enough event
---truncated---Show less |
A remote
code execution security issue exists in the Rockwell Automation Arena®. A crafted DOE
file can force Arena Simulation to write beyond the boundaries of an allocated
object. Exploitation
requires user interactio...Show moreA remote
code execution security issue exists in the Rockwell Automation Arena®. A crafted DOE
file can force Arena Simulation to write beyond the boundaries of an allocated
object. Exploitation
requires user interaction, such as opening a malicious file within the software.
If exploited, a threat actor could execute arbitrary code on the target system.
The software must run under the context of the administrator in order to cause
worse case impact. This is reflected in the Rockwell CVSS score, as AT:P.Show less |
A remote
code execution security issue exists in the Rockwell Automation Arena®. A crafted DOE
file can force Arena Simulation to write beyond the boundaries of an allocated
object. Exploitation
requires user interactio...Show moreA remote
code execution security issue exists in the Rockwell Automation Arena®. A crafted DOE
file can force Arena Simulation to write beyond the boundaries of an allocated
object. Exploitation
requires user interaction, such as opening a malicious file within the software.
If exploited, a threat actor could execute arbitrary code on the target system.
The software must run under the context of the administrator in order to cause
worse case impact. This is reflected in the Rockwell CVSS score, as AT:P.Show less |
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in mruby up to 3.4.0-rc2. Affected is the function scope_new of the file mrbgems/mruby-compiler/core/codegen.c of the component nregs Handler. The manipulat...Show moreA vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in mruby up to 3.4.0-rc2. Affected is the function scope_new of the file mrbgems/mruby-compiler/core/codegen.c of the component nregs Handler. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 1fdd96104180cc0fb5d3cb086b05ab6458911bb9. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.Show less |
Adobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requi...Show moreAdobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.Show less |
Adobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requi...Show moreAdobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.Show less |
Adobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requi...Show moreAdobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.Show less |
Adobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requi...Show moreAdobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.Show less |
Adobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requi...Show moreAdobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.Show less |
Adobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requi...Show moreAdobe Framemaker versions 2020.8, 2022.6 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.Show less |