← Back
CWE-754

675 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions

The product does not check or incorrectly checks for unusual or exceptional conditions that are not expected to occur frequently during day to day operation of the product.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (675)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 21, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Incorrect boundary conditions in the Libraries component in NSS. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 150, Firefox ESR 115.35, Firefox ESR 140.10, Thunderbird 150, and Thunderbird 140.10.
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 21, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Incorrect boundary conditions in the Libraries component in NSS. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 150, Firefox ESR 140.10, Thunderbird 150, and Thunderbird 140.10.
1Free5gc
1Free5gc
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 16, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
free5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. In versions 4.2.1 and below of the UDR service, the PUT handler for updating Policy Data notification subscriptions at /nudr-dr/v2/policy-data/subs-to-noti...Show more
free5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. In versions 4.2.1 and below of the UDR service, the PUT handler for updating Policy Data notification subscriptions at /nudr-dr/v2/policy-data/subs-to-notify/{subsId} does not return after request body retrieval or deserialization errors. Although HTTP 500 or 400 error responses are sent, execution continues and the processor is invoked with a potentially uninitialized or partially initialized PolicyDataSubscription object. This fail-open behavior may allow unintended modification of existing Policy Data notification subscriptions with invalid or empty input, depending on downstream processor and storage behavior. A patched version was not available at the time of publication.Show less
1Dell
1Powerscale Onefs
Oct 7, 2026
Apr 16, 2026
N/A· v4
4.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions prior to 9.12.0.0, contains an improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability...Show more
Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions prior to 9.12.0.0, contains an improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.Show less
1Samsung
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 13, 2026
4.1 MEDIUM· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Improper check for exceptional conditions in Recents prior to SMR Apr-2026 Release 1 allows physical attacker to bypass App Pinning.
1Samsung
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 13, 2026
4.4 MEDIUM· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Improper check for exceptional conditions in Device Care prior to SMR Apr-2026 Release 1 allows physical attackers to bypass Knox Guard.
1Juniper
1Junos
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the flow daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an attacker sending a specific, malformed ICMPv6 packet to cause the srxp...Show more
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the flow daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an attacker sending a specific, malformed ICMPv6 packet to cause the srxpfe process to crash and restart. Continued receipt and processing of these packets will repeatedly crash the srxpfe process and sustain the Denial of Service (DoS) condition. During NAT64 translation, receipt of a specific, malformed ICMPv6 packet destined to the device will cause the srxpfe process to crash and restart. This issue cannot be triggered using IPv4 nor other IPv6 traffic. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series: * all versions before 21.2R3-S10, * all versions of 21.3, * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S12, * all versions of 22.1, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S8, * all versions of 22.4, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S9, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S6, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S7, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2-S3, * from 24.4 before 24.4R2-S3, * from 25.2 before 25.2R1-S2, 25.2R2.Show less
1Juniper
1Junos
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
6.8 MEDIUM· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200 and SRX4600 allows a local attacker with low privil...Show more
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200 and SRX4600 allows a local attacker with low privileges to cause a complete Denial of Service (DoS). When a specific 'show chassis' CLI command is executed, chassisd crashes and restarts which causes a momentary impact to all traffic until all modules are online again. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200 and SRX4600:  * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S6, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S7 * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S2, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2, * 25.2 versions before 25.2R1-S1, 25.2R2.Show less
1Juniper
1Junos
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
6.8 MEDIUM· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300 and SRX4300 allows a local attacker with low privileges to c...Show more
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300 and SRX4300 allows a local attacker with low privileges to cause a complete Denial of Service (DoS). When a specific 'show chassis' CLI command is executed, chassisd crashes and restarts which causes a momentary impact to all traffic until all modules are online again. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300 and SRX4300: * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2. This issue does not affect Junos OS versions before 24.4R1.Show less
1Juniper
1Junos
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on specific EX and QFX Series devices allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker t...Show more
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on specific EX and QFX Series devices allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a complete Denial of Service (DoS). On EX4k, and QFX5k platforms configured as service-provider edge devices, if L2PT is enabled on the UNI and VSTP is enabled on NNI in VXLAN scenarios, receiving VSTP BPDUs on UNI leads to packet buffer allocation failures, resulting in the device to not pass traffic anymore until it is manually recovered with a restart.This issue affects Junos OS: * 24.4 releases before 24.4R2, * 25.2 releases before 25.2R1-S1, 25.2R2. This issue does not affect Junos OS releases before 24.4R1.Show less
1Juniper
1Junos
Jul 8, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to bypass the config...Show more
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to bypass the configured firewall filter and access the control-plane of the device. On MX platforms with MPC10, MPC11, LC4800 or LC9600 line cards, and MX304, firewall filters applied on a loopback interface lo0.n (where n is a non-0 number) don't get executed when lo0.n is in the global VRF / default routing-instance. An affected configuration would be: user@host# show configuration interfaces lo0 | display set set interfaces lo0 unit 1 family inet filter input <filter-name> where a firewall filter is applied to a non-0 loopback interface, but that loopback interface is not referred to in any routing-instance (RI) configuration, which implies that it's used in the default RI. The issue can be observed with the CLI command: user@device> show firewall counter filter <filter_name> not showing any matches. This issue affects Junos OS on MX Series: * all versions before 23.2R2-S6, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S7, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2.Show less
2Sgbet
Sgbett
2Bsv Ruby Sdk
Bsv Ruby Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 9, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
BSV Ruby SDK is the Ruby SDK for the BSV blockchain. From 0.1.0 to before 0.8.2, BSV::Network::ARC's failure detection only recognises REJECTED and DOUBLE_SPEND_ATTEMPTED. ARC responses with txStatus values of INVALID, M...Show more
BSV Ruby SDK is the Ruby SDK for the BSV blockchain. From 0.1.0 to before 0.8.2, BSV::Network::ARC's failure detection only recognises REJECTED and DOUBLE_SPEND_ATTEMPTED. ARC responses with txStatus values of INVALID, MALFORMED, MINED_IN_STALE_BLOCK, or any ORPHAN-containing extraInfo / txStatus are silently treated as successful broadcasts. Applications that gate actions on broadcaster success are tricked into trusting transactions that were never accepted by the network. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.2.Show less
1Openssl
1Openssl
Jul 24, 2026
Apr 7, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to a malicious peer. Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might con...Show more
Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to a malicious peer. Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data leakage to an attacker. RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1 on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero. As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced. If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key, then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM ciphertext. As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate the issue. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.Show less
1Sigstore
1Cosign
Jul 24, 2026
Apr 7, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to 3.0.6 and 2.6.3, cosign verify-blob-attestation may erroneously report a "Verified OK" result for attestations with malformed payloads o...Show more
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to 3.0.6 and 2.6.3, cosign verify-blob-attestation may erroneously report a "Verified OK" result for attestations with malformed payloads or mismatched predicate types. For old-format bundles and detached signatures, this was due to a logic flaw in the error handling of the predicate type validation. For new-format bundles, the predicate type validation was bypassed completely. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.6 and 2.6.3.Show less
1Freebsd
1Freebsd
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 1, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A regression in the way hashes were calculated caused rules containing the address range syntax (x.x.x.x - y.y.y.y) that only differ in the address range(s) involved to be silently dropped as duplicates. Only the first...Show more
A regression in the way hashes were calculated caused rules containing the address range syntax (x.x.x.x - y.y.y.y) that only differ in the address range(s) involved to be silently dropped as duplicates. Only the first of such rules is actually loaded into pf. Ranges expressed using the address[/mask-bits] syntax were not affected. Some keywords representing actions taken on a packet-matching rule, such as 'log', 'return tll', or 'dnpipe', may suffer from the same issue. It is unlikely that users have such configurations, as these rules would always be redundant. Affected rules are silently ignored, which can lead to unexpected behaviour including over- and underblocking.Show less
1Handlebarsjs
1Handlebars
Sep 4, 2026
Mar 27, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, when a Handlebars template contains decorator syntax referencing an unregistered decorator (e.g. `{{*n}}`),...Show more
Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, when a Handlebars template contains decorator syntax referencing an unregistered decorator (e.g. `{{*n}}`), the compiled template calls `lookupProperty(decorators, "n")`, which returns `undefined`. The runtime then immediately invokes the result as a function, causing an unhandled `TypeError: ... is not a function` that crashes the Node.js process. Any application that compiles user-supplied templates without wrapping the call in a `try/catch` is vulnerable to a single-request Denial of Service. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Wrap compilation and rendering in `try/catch`. Validate template input before passing it to `compile()`; reject templates containing decorator syntax (`{{*...}}`) if decorators are not used in your application. Use the pre-compilation workflow; compile templates at build time and serve only pre-compiled templates; do not call `compile()` at request time.Show less
1Mattermost
1Mattermost Server
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 26, 2026
N/A· v4
2.2 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Mattermost Plugins versions <=11.4 10.11.11.0 fail to validate webhook request timestamps which allows an attacker to corrupt Zoom meeting state in Mattermost via replayed webhook requests. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2...Show more
Mattermost Plugins versions <=11.4 10.11.11.0 fail to validate webhook request timestamps which allows an attacker to corrupt Zoom meeting state in Mattermost via replayed webhook requests. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00584Show less
1Mattermost
1Mattermost Server
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 25, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Mattermost versions 11.4.x <= 11.4.0, 11.3.x <= 11.3.1, 11.2.x <= 11.2.3, 10.11.x <= 10.11.11 fail to prevent rendering of external SVGs on link embeds which allows unauthenticated users to crash the Mattermost webapp an...Show more
Mattermost versions 11.4.x <= 11.4.0, 11.3.x <= 11.3.1, 11.2.x <= 11.2.3, 10.11.x <= 10.11.11 fail to prevent rendering of external SVGs on link embeds which allows unauthenticated users to crash the Mattermost webapp and desktop app via creating an issue or PR on GitHub.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00595Show less
1Mozilla
1Firefox
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 24, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: Text component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9.
1Mozilla
1Firefox
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 24, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Incorrect boundary conditions in the Audio/Video component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9.