← Back
CWE-693

627 CVEs • Abstraction: Pillar

Protection Mechanism Failure

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (627)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Jul 14, 2026
Jul 14, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
A security flaw has been discovered in mosaxiv clawlet up to 0.2.10. The affected element is the function guardExecCommand of the file tools/tool_exec.go of the component exec Safety Guard. The manipulation results in pr...Show more
A security flaw has been discovered in mosaxiv clawlet up to 0.2.10. The affected element is the function guardExecCommand of the file tools/tool_exec.go of the component exec Safety Guard. The manipulation results in protection mechanism failure. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed with the label "not planned".Show less
-
-
Jul 13, 2026
Jul 13, 2026
1.9 LOW· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
1.7 LOW· v2
A vulnerability was found in lamaalrajih kicad-mcp up to 3.3.1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file kicad_mcp/utils/path_validator.py. Performing a manipulation of the argument project_path/schematic_p...Show more
A vulnerability was found in lamaalrajih kicad-mcp up to 3.3.1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file kicad_mcp/utils/path_validator.py. Performing a manipulation of the argument project_path/schematic_path results in protection mechanism failure. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.Show less
-
-
Jul 14, 2026
Jul 10, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
PraisonAI (pip package praisonaiagents) before 1.6.78 contains an unsafe dynamic module loading vulnerability in AgentFlow._resolve_pydantic_class (src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/workflows/workflows.py). When a wor...Show more
PraisonAI (pip package praisonaiagents) before 1.6.78 contains an unsafe dynamic module loading vulnerability in AgentFlow._resolve_pydantic_class (src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/workflows/workflows.py). When a workflow step uses a string output_pydantic reference, the framework locates and imports a sibling tools.py from the workflow file's directory via importlib exec_module without sandboxing, ignoring the PRAISONAI_ALLOW_*_TOOLS environment variables. An attacker who controls a workflow file and its sibling tools.py can execute arbitrary Python code with the workflow runner's privileges when the workflow is executed via WorkflowManager or after load_yaml.Show less
-
-
Jul 14, 2026
Jul 10, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
PraisonAI before 4.6.78 contains a prompt injection defense bypass vulnerability where the injection defense only blocks threats classified as CRITICAL, requiring three or more detector families to match simultaneously....Show more
PraisonAI before 4.6.78 contains a prompt injection defense bypass vulnerability where the injection defense only blocks threats classified as CRITICAL, requiring three or more detector families to match simultaneously. Attackers can craft single or double-vector prompt injections that are classified as HIGH threat level and pass through unblocked to reach the model.Show less
-
-
Jul 10, 2026
Jul 9, 2026
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, who...Show more
SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, whose denylist misses common home-directory credential files such as .git-credentials, .netrc, .pgpass, .kube/config, .docker/config.json, and .gnupg, allowing an authenticated administrator or API-token user to copy those files into the workspace and exfiltrate them through the file API. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.Show less
1Paloaltonetworks
1Prisma Access Agent
Jul 16, 2026
Jul 9, 2026
5.8 MEDIUM· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Multiple protection mechanism failures in the Prisma Access Agent Data Loss Prevention (DLP) component for Windows allow a local user to bypass DLP policy enforcement controls. The Prisma Access Agent on macOS is not...Show more
Multiple protection mechanism failures in the Prisma Access Agent Data Loss Prevention (DLP) component for Windows allow a local user to bypass DLP policy enforcement controls. The Prisma Access Agent on macOS is not affected.Show less
1Openwebui
1Open Webui
Jul 10, 2026
Jul 9, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST matching compared configured host entries against URL strings and non-label-boundary suffixes,...Show more
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST matching compared configured host entries against URL strings and non-label-boundary suffixes, allowing path-based blocklist bypasses such as !internal.example.com in a URL path and sibling-domain matches that did not reflect the intended hostname policy. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.Show less
1N8n
1N8n
Jul 9, 2026
Jul 9, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.27.4 and 2.28.1, the AI Agents feature did not enforce the Allowed HTTP Request Domains restriction configured on credentials when an MCP tool was pointed at...Show more
n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.27.4 and 2.28.1, the AI Agents feature did not enforce the Allowed HTTP Request Domains restriction configured on credentials when an MCP tool was pointed at an arbitrary URL, allowing a member-level user with use-only access to a shared credential to send its secret to an external server they control. This issue is fixed in versions 2.27.4 and 2.28.1.Show less
1Trailofbits
1Fickling
Jul 10, 2026
Jul 4, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In Trail of Bits fickling versions up to and including 0.1.11, the UnsafeImportsML analysis pass unconditionally calls AnalysisContext.shorten_code(node) on every import node it inspects, regardless of whether the import...Show more
In Trail of Bits fickling versions up to and including 0.1.11, the UnsafeImportsML analysis pass unconditionally calls AnalysisContext.shorten_code(node) on every import node it inspects, regardless of whether the import is flagged as unsafe. This call registers the shortened code representation in the shared AnalysisContext.reported_shortened_code set. When the MLAllowlist analysis pass subsequently runs, it calls the same shorten_code() method, receives already_reported=True for every import, and executes a continue statement that skips its allowlist check entirely. This renders MLAllowlist dead code for all imports — it never evaluates whether an import is in the ML allowlist or not. The MLAllowlist pass was designed to catch imports of modules outside the known-safe ML ecosystem (torch, numpy, transformers, etc.) that slip past the UnsafeImports denylist. With MLAllowlist inoperative, any standard library module not in the UNSAFE_IMPORTS denylist can be invoked via pickle deserialization while fickling's check_safety() returns LIKELY_SAFE. The fickling.load() API chains check_safety() into pickle.loads() as an explicit security gate, meaning a LIKELY_SAFE verdict causes the payload to be deserialized and executed. The root cause is shared mutable state between independently-correct analysis passes — UnsafeImportsML works as designed in isolation, MLAllowlist works as designed in isolation, but the shared reported_shortened_code set causes UnsafeImportsML to poison MLAllowlist's deduplication logic.Show less
-
-
Jul 6, 2026
Jul 4, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A security flaw has been discovered in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 0.15.2. The affected element is the function shell.exec of the file tui_gateway/server.py. The manipulation results in protection mechanism failure....Show more
A security flaw has been discovered in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 0.15.2. The affected element is the function shell.exec of the file tui_gateway/server.py. The manipulation results in protection mechanism failure. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less
-
-
Jul 6, 2026
Jul 4, 2026
7.6 HIGH· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect operator.methodcaller function calls in pickle files, allowing attackers to bypass security checks. Remote attackers can craft malicious pickle payloads using operator.methodcalle...Show more
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect operator.methodcaller function calls in pickle files, allowing attackers to bypass security checks. Remote attackers can craft malicious pickle payloads using operator.methodcaller that execute arbitrary code when loaded, compromising systems relying on picklescan for validation.Show less
-
-
Jul 2, 2026
Jul 1, 2026
7.6 HIGH· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design...Show more
Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation:  Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both.  Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcherShow less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 3, 2026
Jul 1, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML pa...Show more
Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 1, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in AI in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium sec...Show more
Inappropriate implementation in AI in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 2, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromi...Show more
Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 2, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient policy enforcement in Sandbox in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page...Show more
Insufficient policy enforcement in Sandbox in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 1, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML...Show more
Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 1, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient policy enforcement in Browser in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chro...Show more
Insufficient policy enforcement in Browser in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 1, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient policy enforcement in Privacy in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed an attacker in a privileged network position to leak cross-origin data via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity...Show more
Insufficient policy enforcement in Privacy in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed an attacker in a privileged network position to leak cross-origin data via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jul 1, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient policy enforcement in Network in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)