← Back
CWE-693

903 CVEs • Abstraction: Pillar

Protection Mechanism Failure

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (903)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Google
1Android
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not neede...Show more
In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
8.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not nee...Show more
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
8.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple functions of fpc_tee_hal.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interacti...Show more
In multiple functions of fpc_tee_hal.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
8.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In enable_segment of remap.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is n...Show more
In enable_segment of remap.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible authentication bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction i...Show more
In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible authentication bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for ex...Show more
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In addr_remap_address_map of remap.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interacti...Show more
In addr_remap_address_map of remap.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for...Show more
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
8.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In ac_init_policy of init.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is no...Show more
In ac_init_policy of init.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In gsa_sw_pk_hash_compare of image-auth-srv.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User...Show more
In gsa_sw_pk_hash_compare of image-auth-srv.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
1Google
1Android
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In ac_init_one_sswrp of init.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is...Show more
In ac_init_one_sswrp of init.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Show less
-
-
Sep 30, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
MCP Context Forge is an AI gateway, registry, and proxy for MCP, A2A, REST, and gRPC APIs. Prior to 1.0.2, the python_sandbox_server in mcp-servers/python/python_sandbox_server/src/python_sandbox_server/server_fastmcp.py...Show more
MCP Context Forge is an AI gateway, registry, and proxy for MCP, A2A, REST, and gRPC APIs. Prior to 1.0.2, the python_sandbox_server in mcp-servers/python/python_sandbox_server/src/python_sandbox_server/server_fastmcp.py exposes raw getattr through safe_builtins, omits a required _getattr_ guard, and relies on validate_code checks for literal dangerous dunder strings. An attacker can construct dunder names at runtime, traverse the Python class hierarchy, reach subprocess.Popen, and execute OS commands with the server process privileges through the execute_code MCP tool. The HTTP/SSE transport can expose this tool without authentication, while stdio-only deployments have reduced network reachability. The issue affects the python_sandbox_server subproject and does not directly affect the core Context Forge gateway or proxy components. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.2.Show less
1Freerdp
1Freerdp
Sep 24, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
9.2 CRITICAL· v4
9.3 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
FreeRDP server versions before 3.31.0 contain a protocol negotiation bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to establish RDSTLS connections despite server policy disabling them. Attackers can send inc...Show more
FreeRDP server versions before 3.31.0 contain a protocol negotiation bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to establish RDSTLS connections despite server policy disabling them. Attackers can send incompatible protocol requests, receive negotiation failures, then complete TLS handshake and enter RDSTLS to bypass pre-authentication transport restrictions.Show less
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Mitigation bypass in the Widget: Win32 component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Mitigation bypass in the Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Mitigation bypass in the Popup Blocker component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Sandbox escape in the Profile Backup component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156 and Thunderbird 156.
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Mitigation bypass in the Enterprise Policies component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.
1Mozilla
2Firefox
Thunderbird
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
N/A· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Notifications component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, and Thunderbird 153.3.